Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • A never ending torrent of **it Outrage as ‘tidal wave’ of sewage floods historic market town’s unique chalk river WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Exclusive: Water firm pumps sewage into river Misbourne, Amersham on 21 ‘dry days’ during nearly five month period  
    • Worth noting that all of these firms - either the alleged EIS investment, the rebate company themselves or the payee were all registered to the same address. Clavering House is 3 miles away from HMRC Benton Park view offices.   Wardrop - unfortunately unsuccessful due to late appeal - assessments opened by HMRC in March 2019. Scammed by Richard Hall (Capital allowances consultants ltd - Clavering House) investments into Cryoblast Limited 15/16 (Paul Huggins - Clavering House) and Eco Cooling solutions 16/17 (Anthony Fitches - Clavering House).    Mccuminsky - scammed by Capital Allowances after providing his details to Stefan Brown Alpha Tax Consultants (Clavering House) payment made to Eco Cooling Solutions.    Robson - scammed by Capital Allowances - 15/16 paid to Cryoblast 16/17 paid to Eco Cooling.    Myself - scammed by Allan Maxwell - MaxTax (other business Maxwell electronics) registered to Clavering House.   Cryoblast Solutions and Fast Tax - Alan O’Hara    Please note there are two Cryoblasts involved - Cryoblast limited (Paul Huggins and Clavering House) and Cryoblast Solutions Limited (Alan O’Hara also director of Fast Tax).    My return simply said “Cryoblast” another thing that should have been clarified as part of HMRC guidelines before paying out the claim.    Cryoblast limited was already suspected to be involved in fraudulent claims before my investment as Huntly had open assessments issued in November 2018.    Cryoblast Solutions, the same company director as Fast Tax where my money was sent was dissolved before my claims were submitted. 
    • On the d-day issue, * we know sunaks shameful self-interest preferring a hope at using lies for self-promotion over honoring our heroes, * we know Starmer demonstrated his statesmanship with other statesmen and women,  ** BUT where was Farage? Was he in a pub looking for self-promotion? .. Surely as a wannabe statesman - he should have spent a bit of his (someone elses?) cash attending the ceremonies? or wasn't he offered a seat near enough the front to interest him?   mind you .. "I said I wanted my county back. Well now I want my life back ... I am not a career politician... I won't be changing my mind again, I promise you" - Nigel Farage, stepping down from public life. 5 July 2016  
    • dont need them.   let the defendant play the terms game
    • I am reading the thread now and think although its probably very similar to my predicament,  I have no way of obtaining the terms anymore due to MyParcelDelivery having being dissolved and their website not being active now. I have nothing to quote from and they didn't send me a copy at the time of order, the website that I believe they reinvented themselves as P4D has terms I am looking at now but however similar they may be I wont be able to quote from them in this case. Thanks 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

I am pretty sure this parking ticket is invalid


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6419 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Please can someone review my letter to see if I am right? I was issued an Excess Charge Ticket in a Council car park...is this the same as a PCN under Road Traffic Regs Act?

Many thanks

To Whom It May Concern:

 

Ref:

 

I am writing with regards to the above parking ticket, which was placed on my vehicle on 10th November 2006.

 

I wish to formally make an appeal against this ticket on the grounds set out below.

 

1. The ECN issued contains the date of alleged parking infringement – however, it does not state the date of contravention or a date of issue. This is not in accordance with Section 66 of The Road Traffic Act 1991. Therefore, this ticket is invalid. Should there be any doubt in this matter, I refer you to a ruling made by PTAS in February 2006, which must be followed by way of Statutory Interpretation.

2. The ticket is headed up as an Excess Charge Notice and was contained within a Penalty Charge Notice Envelope, this is contradictory.

3. The ticket is unenforceable by you because it refers to Road Traffic Regulations Act 1984, this has in fact been superceeded by the Road Traffic Regulations Act of 1991.

4. Nowhere on the ticket does it state the ‘Owner of the Vehicle’ is responsible. I am not in fact the owner of the vehicle it is leant to me by a leasing organisation.

Please also note that at the age of 31 this is my first ever parking ticket, I would not have appealed had I not been shocked and distressed by the extortionate charge of £30 or £60 after 14days. I was 12 minutes late back to the car after queuing in the Royal Bank of Scotland, I feel that an excess charge of this size is disproportionate to the alleged contravention. Do you realise that £30 is the cost of 1 days childcare and I only get £27 a month tax credits, I live on the breadline, work fulltime with a 3 year old suffering from my lack of time to be with him, pay full council tax bill and do not have this sort of money to fritter on over-inflated charges deemed lawful by you.

 

On the basis of the above points of fact, it is clear that this ticket is invalid and cannot be legally enforced. Should any further action be commenced against myself with regards to this ticket, I will have no further hesitation but to refer this matter into the hands of either PTAS or a Civil Court.

 

I would be grateful if you would confirm receipt of this letter within 7 days by way of the Self Addressed Envelope enclosed, and request that should you disagree, you must inform me in writing no less that 14 days before commencing any action relating to the alleged offence.

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your letter is unfortunately a waste of time:(

 

If the referenced law is the 1984 Act then the matter of two dates is irrelevant - that only applies to decriminalised parking under the RTA1991.

 

The 1984 Act was a dog's breakfast and allows councils to set charges individually. All of these and the restrictions and application of restrictions must be contained in a TRO (Traffic Regulation Order) and it is to this that you must refer if you wish to challenge the legality. This is obtainable from the Highway Authority - usually the County Council unless this is a Unitary Authority (when it is the local authority) or a Trunk Road/Motorway (then it is the Highways Agency)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will refer to the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 as this is the law under which the council makes its Traffic Regulation Orders. The offence is therefore contrary to the RTRA 1984.

 

The Road Traffic Act 1991 introduced decriminalised parking enforcement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...