Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • regarding 5. do I mention the CCA 1974 act or just leave is as 'section 78 request'  ?   Thanks you.
    • ive just received this reply this morning, no mention of the disability discrimination? should i reply and ask them why they are ignoring it?:   Thank you for your email.   I would like to clarify some details for you and reassure you that the fine has been looked into thoroughly from our side, from this it was confirmed that as the fine appeal has been denied and it was raised to IAS who also denied the appeal, as a result of this we would be unable to over turn this decision.   I understand this may not be the outcome you had hoped for, and I am sorry for any inconvenience caused.    Kind regards, Lauren
    • Well the PH, although lengthy, (3 hrs) went well. Claim in time and only dropped one of the seven claims as it was unnecessary. The Judge gave great advice and commended us on our presentation of the claim, have to thank Valla for that one. Now for a bit of a breather before the 5 day hearing later this year. Thanks for all the advice and steers to date. 
    • to note: the claimant has given a 'reference' number. It is 11 digits long. Regarding 2 - do I even say I have had dealings with Barclays Bank UK PLC ?   Also the 'particulars of claim' are not in paragraphs on the claim form. It is just one chunk of text. With sentences. Do I refer to these as paragraphs ? As I have in the above defence.
    • 1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The claimant even fails to refer to an agreement number. Therefore the defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.   2. Paragraph 2 is noted. Whilst I have had dealings with Barclays Bank UK PLC given that claimant fails to refer to an account number I am unaware what agreement the claimant wishes to rely upon.   3.Paragraph 3 is noted although without knowledge of which account the claimant refers to I can neither admit or deny the receipt of a Default Notice pursuant to sec 87(1) CCA1974 being received.   4. Paragraph 4 is noted but again as above I am not aware of what agreement the assignment refers to.   5. On receipt of this claim I requested information pertaining to this claim from PRA group (UK) Limited by way of a CPR 31:14 request sent via 1st class recorded post on 06/06/2024 and further to the above I sent PRA group UK Portfolios Ltd a section 78 request via 1st class recorded post on 06/06/2024.   To date, PRA Group Uk Portfolios Ltd or PRA group (UK) Limited are yet to furnish me with the requested information  and therefore prevented from enforcing the alleged agreement.   6.Therefore with the court’s permission the Claimant is put to strict proof to evidence and :   a) show and disclose how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; b) show and disclose how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed for; c) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a Default Notice pursuant to Sec 87 (1) CCA1974. d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;   8. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.   By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

A car I bought privately still has outstanding Finance and staying In our house relies on selling it


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3074 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All.

 

I bought my car back in November privately for £5500 cash.

I asked if there was any finance outstanding etc which they said no.

 

Just before Christmas I fell ill with my kidneys and now await an operation.

Unable to work and having started a new job I do not get sick pay losing £630 per week.

Now my rent is due along with lots of other bills.

 

I made the decision to sell my car, downgrade and use some of the money to left to pay off rent and essential bills.

I took it to a garage saw a car we liked.

Arranged to swap my car and get £1200 back.

The dealer checked my car out to find out there's an outstanding finance agreement.

 

I spoke to the creditor, who is Barclays personal finance who agreed there is an outstanding agreement

and they require some forms to be filled out which I have done.

 

 

I had to write down where I bought it.

How I paid.

If I had a receipt.

When buying the car the seller drawn out a receipt stating how much I paid for it and when and we both signed it.

It also asked if I knew if there was any finance outstanding which I didn't and if I had done a hpi check which I did not.

 

I have also sent copy of the log book showing Last owner.

i also wrote Down I bought the vehicle in good faith , which I did.

 

Now that was a few days ago.

This car is the only thing what can same me my partner and our 1 year old getting kicked out.

We had some savings but that went on last months bills and Christmas.

I need to sell the car but now I may lose it and have nothing.

I took out a loan to pay or the car initially so we may lose the car and pay for something we do not have.

 

I have read that if you declare the car was bought in good faith and you have a receipt of some kind they will let you keep the car .

However I am unsure about this.

Someone said just sell it anyway as they will just remove the hpi mark as I bought the vehicle in good faith.

 

Is there anyone who can help me with this as I'm making myself more I'll worrying about this and my family getting kicked out.

I am a hard working person.

Pay my bills and provide for my.family and now this has happened.

My family can't help as they are elderly. I just have no where to turn to.

 

CAB were useless, as where the finance advice line.

all I keep being told is to seek financial help from family.

Which isn't an option and we can't get loans as I went bankrupt a few years back due to my employment going down after a bunch of break ins.

 

Please help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Sorry to hear about your problems, I am a kidney patient myself and know how worrying it is, but believe me you will get through it.

as regards your problem

 

The law you require is contained here:

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1964/53/section/27

Protection of purchasers of motor vehicles.

 

(1)This section applies where a motor vehicle has been bailed or (in Scotland) hired under a hire-purchase agreement, or has been agreed to be sold under a conditional sale agreement, and, before the property in the vehicle has become vested in the debtor, he disposes of the vehicle to another person.

(2)Where the disposition referred to in subsection (1) above is to a private purchaser, and he is a purchaser of the motor vehicle in good faith without notice of the hire-purchase or conditional sale agreement (the “relevant agreement”) that disposition shall have effect as if the creditor’s title to the vehicle has been vested in the debtor immediately before that disposition.

 

You can quote this to whoever you feel needs to be aware of it, not that they will not be aware of it already. You can tell them that you will not be giving the car back and will present this legislation should your title be questioned.

 

Tell them that you intend on selling the vehicle, I would see what they come back with first and post it on here.

 

Chin up.

 

Peter

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

How long ago did you send the info and is there any current marker relating to hPI on the car ?

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

How long ago did you send the info and is there any current marker relating to hPI on the car ?

 

Yes there is a marker, that's how the dealer found out. I had no idea. I sent it all 3 days ago via email. I called up today and asked if they have it and they confirmed but can't do nothing at the moment

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the dealer aware of the current position as ihe willing to buy under these circumstances , even though the marker is still on the file ?

 

He must surely have come across this before.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the dealer aware of the current position as ihe willing to buy under these circumstances , even though the marker is still on the file ?

 

He must surely have come across this before.

 

He is not willing to purchase it anymore. I and wouldn't want to sell if it will back fire on me.

He said to mentions the legislation and that it was bought in good faith. But other than that there's nothing else I can do.

 

I have explained the situation to Barclays but they do not care. No sympathy at all. I did say I could of not said anything and sold the car on privately but I'm not like that. I wouldn't want someone else to go through this. They just said 'ok'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well there are a number of issues in that case. they are pretending you form realising your asset, there is a civil action you can take. wcer I appreciate that this may not be an option for you. What you need is an authoritative source to speak on your behalf. Have you tried national debtline, ther are usually very good on this kind of issue, there is or used to be one of their advisers on here. I will try and direct him to your thread.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well there are a number of issues in that case. they are pretending you form realising your asset, there is a civil action you can take. wcer I appreciate that this may not be an option for you. What you need is an authoritative source to speak on your behalf. Have you tried national debtline, ther are usually very good on this kind of issue, there is or used to be one of their advisers on here. I will try and direct him to your thread.

 

I spoke to someone earlier from ndl and they said best action is to speak to barclays. As I am not the account holder and I do not know any of the account holders details there is nothing they can do anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I spoke to someone earlier from ndl and they said best action is to speak to barclays. As I am not the account holder and I do not know any of the account holders details there is nothing they can do anyway.

 

THis has nothing to do with any HP agreement, this is a case restricting free use of your property. The agreement may still active between the parties and in any case has nothing to do with you or your car, it is a different matter altogether give them 24 hrs to remove it before you commence a civil action for damages.

See if that provokes dome kind of action from them.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

THis has nothing to do with any HP agreement, this is a case restricting free use of your property. The agreement may still active between the parties and nothing do in any case has nothing to do with you or your car, it is a different matter altogether give them 24 hrs to remove it before you commence a civil action for damages.

See if that provokes dome kind of action from them.

 

But technically doesn't the car belong to them.

I do not want to threaten them and make things worse.

I know a few years back when this happened the cars were simply siezed and money was lost. I remember it happened to someone I worked with back in 2010.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, it is lt doesn't read the legislation quoted.

 

When you say "could make matters worse "? I was given the understanding you were about to be thrown out onto the street, how exactly worse ?

 

I think I am wasting my time here, you start by giving us the impression you know nothing about this, then whatever is suggested you already know, now we find you think you actually understood the whole process, when you in fact do not.

 

Bye

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, it is lt doesn't read the legislation quoted.

 

When you say "could make matters worse "? I was given the understanding you were about to be thrown out onto the street, how exactly worse ?

 

I think I am wasting my time here, you start by giving us the impression you know nothing about this, then whatever is suggested you already know, now we find you think you actually understood the whole process, when you in fact do not.

 

Bye

 

I know nothing about the finance and what I can do. I have quoted to them regarding the legislation and also contacted a few debt help lines.. however; I am not the one in debt and they say they cannot help me and advise me to contact the original creditor, which I have done.

 

Aside from that I do not know what else I can do, can they take the car back? Can I still sell the car and if I did could u be liable for anything?

 

Things are bad, but by making things worse I mean by threatening them surely they will try and take the car back indefinitely. .so yes it can get worse.

I could lose the car , all the money I paid for it, the house and my health isn't going to get bet like this.

 

I have done what most people recommended with the legislation. But I want to know if possible can I still sell the car. Do I have a right to. Or will it likely be siezed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can sell the vehicle, however no dealer will buy it and many private individuals will HPI before buying the vehicle.

 

As mentioned above, if you can show you paid market value for the vehicle and were lead to believe this provided clear title when purchasing the vehicle, you will not be deprived of the asset.

 

(1)This section applies where a motor vehicle has been bailed or (in Scotland) hired under a hire-purchase agreement, or has been agreed to be sold under a conditional sale agreement, and, before the property in the vehicle has become vested in the debtor, he disposes of the vehicle to another person.

(2)Where the disposition referred to in subsection (1) above is to a private purchaser, and he is a purchaser of the motor vehicle in good faith without notice of the hire-purchase or conditional sale agreement (the “relevant agreement”) that disposition shall have effect as if the creditor’s title to the vehicle has been vested in the debtor immediately before that disposition.

 

 

I know a lot of Barclays Partner Finance agreements are written on Fixed Sum Loan Agreements (Personal Loan) not secured on the vehicle.

I also know of lenders that still put a marker on HPI even though they don't have an interest in the vehicle.

 

 

It might be worth confirming with Barclays Partner Finance that the finance is indeed a PCP/HP agreement,

as if it isn't, you can insist they remove the marker.

 

 

If it is an HP/PCP agreement, I would write a formal complaint to Barclays with your receipt, quoting legislation, etc.

giving them a deadline to respond to and then taking the complaint to the Ombudsman and FCA (Financial Conduct Authority)

if they do not respond to the complaint. (I think they have 40 days to respond, but it may be less).

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

good post was thinking about asking this all night when in bed.^^^^^^

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I spoke to Barclays today and they said it's a clear cut case and I should be ok and they will let me know on Friday

 

 

I said I want to sell the car and they said if you take it to a dealer they probably won't buy it as there is a HPI Marker on but it's should be sorted by Friday.

 

I did ask and they said it's secured against the car.

 

I am just going to list it privately I think .

I can't see as I am doing anything wrong doing so now I have submitted everything to them.

 

 

I'm addition they never said I couldn't when I stated I wanted to sell it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK...you can sell it privately, provided that buyer doesn't do an HPI check.

 

Why would you not wait until the marker is removed on Friday and then proceed with the original intention of selling to the dealer and getting the other vehicle? Unless of course you can sell it privately for more...

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK...you can sell it privately, provided that buyer doesn't do an HPI check.

 

Why would you not wait until the marker is removed on Friday and then proceed with the original intention of selling to the dealer and getting the other vehicle? Unless of course you can sell it privately for more...

 

That's exactly it I can sell it private for more. They said u should call back Friday for an update if I haven't heard anything. I may not have a definite answer, however he has stated it will more then likely just get removed as I submitted more than enough evidence

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...