EU demands foreign docs be allowed to work in UK WITHOUT any checks on qualifications

[tobyjugg2]

Now I've seen clearly English/British health staff (whatever their race colour or creed) that I would wish sacked on the spot, and staff for whom English was clearly a recently learned language whom I wish I could guarantee were the ones to look after me and mine.

 

Its the culture of tolerance of inadequacy and carelessness which is insidiously growing everywhere, especially 'services' that I would see changed.

[tobyjugg2]

Its rather ridiculous that all that it needs is a delay for safety checks to be officially bypassed.

 

This should be legally challenged.

 

Well despite my doubts on what would perhaps be best for the British people overall, this has finally convinced me that out is the right way to vote.

[tobyjugg2]

Depends on whether you believe this or not. I suspect that the truth is that any employer within any EU country is entitlted to conduct the standard pre employment checks.

 

If you break your leg or have a heart attack in any country, do you start asking for proof of medical qualifications of the Doctors and Nurses helping you, before they start any treatment.

 

Theres a difference between having docters/nurses in hospitals in spain who jave passed western style exams and vetting, and someone totally inappropriate who has repeatedly tried and failed to get a job in an EU country but has got a EU medical qualification passport just because time ran out.

 

Imagine 80,000 migrants all applying in January after getting german visas .....

 

 

Its simply wrong that anyone get a national, let alone international qualification/certification without proper, competent and thorough vetting.

[tobyjugg2]

I would hope that the trust / hopsital employing these people would actually their qualifications before employing them. Afterall, it's what any other company does.

 

Perhaps, but

 

"It means UK regulators will have to give applicants licences to practise without first checking they have the necessary qualifications and have not lied on forms or been suspended."

means that crucial (in my opinion) checks will have been made - not just unwanted - but against the 'rules'

 

Mind you, the mail online can't even use a spell checker for this crucial and 'critical' article.

 

Here is the detail

http://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/services/free-movement-professionals/policy/european-professional-card/index_en.htm

 

here is nhsemployers view

http://www.nhsemployers.org/your-workforce/recruit/employer-led-recruitment/international-recruitment/mobility-of-health-professionals-across-europe

 

 

and here is how they intend to expand it

http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/News/2011/June/30061104.asp

 

[tobyjugg2]

As mentioned above I dont believe the EU has stupid rulings,

 

if you believe that then perhaps you are in the wrong forum,

 

That seems to me to be the definition of what is wrong with this sites management, where certain people think that anyone who disagrees with their opinion should not be here.

 

 

they have done a great deal for individual human rights and consumer laws,

 

This myth that the EU somehow rules over us and makes our lives worse is in my opinion an absolute fallacy

Yes I agree the EU have done a great deal for human rights which it is unlikely any of our parties would have done without that prodding,

 

but the EU are certainly NOT faultless and an example of a very wrong approach is:

Germany weeing all over the rules, laws and security of the EU by not just allowing, but encouraging illegal migrants into europe while leaving genuine refugees in refugee camps

 

Whether Camerons stance that refugees should come via legitimate methods from refugee camps is just rhetoric delay tactics or not, what he says is the right approach, and Merkels decisions on behalf of a very opposing EU is one example of a very wrong 'edict'.

Which has put the structure and security of every nation in the EU and the EU itself at great risk.