Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Feeling tempted to cancel it now but scared that some of the debts will do more Ccj on me and I'll have to wait 6 years again.  2 of the Ccj come of this year and then I'll only have the iva in credit file - so effectivly if I'd have not took out the iva I 2021 I'd have clear score by now - but then again would I because I would have been hounded the last 3 years so as bad as it is it's saves me lots of headaches whilst my debt was still within the 6 year mark.  I think most of them are near there but in all honesty no point chasing them if I do cancel iva I'd jjst wait for the ones who contact me and then start the relevant letter process on them.  Of over 6 years easy if not still possible to write off.    My true victory would be having the iva wiped off my credit file as misold or something that way I. Don't have to wait till 2027 Other option is to fight back and ask for them to offer the creditors to accept payments so far and use the following method    Will your IVA firm agree to complete your IVA on the basic of funds paid to date? The Guidance lists a lot of factors to be considered in deciding whether a settlement on the basis of funds paid to date should be proposed. You should read the list. But that may not give you any feel for whether they apply to you or not. The following are my thoughts on when an IVA should be treated as settled, not failed. They assume that you have £75 or less to pay a month: if you would currently qualify for a Debt Relief Order, then your IVA should be settled now  There is no point in making your IVA fail and you have to apply for a DRO – it will not generate another penny for your creditors. If you are renting and owe less than £50,000, check the DRO criteria now and talk to National Debtline on 0808 808 4000 about whether you qualify. You may have been told at the start of your IVA that you aren’t eligible – still check now as the DRO criteria have changed, your situation has got worse, and some people were given incorrect information about DROs at the start. if you have no assets that would be realised in bankruptcy (eg a house with equity, car worth over £2000), then your IVA should be settled now Same as (1), there is no point in making you apply for bankruptcy after your IVA fails. if your only asset is a car that is worth less than £8000, then your IVA should be settled now A car that is worth say £5000 would normally be sold in bankruptcy and you would be given a small amount to buy a cheaper car. But your creditors would not get any benefit from this as the Insolvency Service takes the first £8000 raised to cover its own costs. if you have significant assets, the closer you are to the end of the IVA, the less reasonable it is to fail it If you have been paying your IVA for 4 years, you have done your best over a long period. It isn’t your fault you can no longer continue. The fact you may have had equity to release isn’t relevant as that simply isn’t going to be possible. if your situation will clearly improve soon, then it’s unlikely your IVA will be settled I mean real improvements, not hoping that prices fall. If I can get them to accept payment to date or threaten with cancellation hopefully they may accept it -    Other option is to try and borrow money and pay make a full and final offer    Or I can just ignore and hope for the best which I'm very tempted to do especially if they respond to my review with bullying tactics despite me being skint as a fart with no mortgage as renting    It's so stressful but I've just checked the iva agreement from 2021 and it's Cabot 2 account Lowel about 5 accounts and then lots of repeats of the same debt with for example zopa and Cabot same amount listed twice -  also loyyds banks but I'm sure that's older than 6 years and not on credit file anyway    If I can somehow remove the iva from my creitt file I'd be happy   
    • Sorry I meant credit fix - I really wish I'd known this before - kicking myself right now  If they come back to me asking for more money I'll cancel it and start trying to deal with the debt myself let's see what they say 
    • India has one of the world's fastest growing economies but the benefits are yet to fully reach the poorest.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Backdoor CCJ - Lowell/Carter re:Shop Direct CAT debt - now +5yrs old - should i be worried?


Anonuser
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1296 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

an unknown company has filed a CCJ against me for £756 at County Court Business Centre, at an old address.

 

However, none of my old debts are registered at this address so I cannot pin point it.

 

I have 3 settled debts which were settled a couple of years back so matching up the debts with the CCJ amount for £756,

I have an outstanding one for £734 but at a different address, it was applied on 06/10/2015

 

My debts are settled and closed barring 3 from Lowell which I think were for a catalogue

(I didn't pay because the interest versus monthly instalments didn't make sense and would be a vicious circle)

so I'm guessing it's one of these, but I'm not sure why they've sent it to an old address when the debts are registered to another of my addresses.

 

I see now these things never do go away and I'm willing to settle all 3 in one (if possible) as I'm now in a better position,

but my question was where do I go next to find out more about the CCJ?

One of them was over 6 years and I can't find it on my credit report to compare to the CCJ.

 

Do I now write to the courts and request more informations?

 

I've currently bookmarked a load of nationaldebtline pages to sift through which is daunting

but wanted to narrow down my search a bit as there's a few different wordings and templates.

 

Best regards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you know the CCJ number

phone northants

 

 

why do you think you need to pay your debts off?

if they are shown as defaulted on your credit file

payin them wont clean your file.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx,

 

The one's I knew I could clear, I paid off, but the one's (i.e I think these are Lowell one's) that I knew I couldn't clear, I left.

 

The only reason to pay off would be to clear the CCJ but as it was sent to an old address and now over 30 days,

I need to know more info such as if the court resets the 30 days (should I choose to pay the amount) as I'm now at a new address.

 

I'll call Northants first thing Monday, I'm guessing there's nothing I can say that will go against me?

 

Best regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

forget the other debts for the moment

as lowells [the buyer listed on your credit file?]

know where you live...

 

the CCJ

is it a CCJ or is it a claimform?

 

what do you know.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks once again for helping,

 

" Case number B5AQ****

County Court Judgment Active" This is what it shows on the credit report.

 

I keep most letters so will scour through them all to see if they've wrote to me at my current address,

so hopefully, after phoning the court I can pinpoint which company is chasing me.

 

Hoping that they've written to me at my new address but issued the CCJ at the old one.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's it you're learning.

 

if the claimant or their sols

even on another debt, wrote to you at your present address

then you've got a set aside basis,

but we'll need to delve further

and ofcourse find a defence that will hold up

 

but that's for later on

info gathering stage at present.

 

ideally, ALL your old addresses should show on your credit file

if they don't, then you need to update them.

 

not informing your creditors of a change of address

leaves you open for a backdoor CCJ.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant, thank you.

 

 

All my addresses show on all reports,

 

 

but I wouldn't have informed the CCJ claimant of my present address.

 

 

I will talk to the courts on Monday and update.

 

 

Appreciate the replies and have a good weekend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

all you need is a copy of the CCJ from Northants

 

 

the rest can be dealt with once we have the info.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that s why I didn't advise that

TOL does not give you the POC nor the judgement or claimant etc

 

 

only way is by obtaining a copy of the CCJ.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I've spoken with the courts and have some useful information.

 

The debt is Lowell/Brian Carter, it was purchased in 2010. The court said they entered the CCJ by default, or something along those lines. They want £50 a month.

 

I'm currently on all 3 credit reports and nowhere can I see this debt.

 

I'm currently sifting through old letters to see if I can find if they've written to me at the current address, even though they claimed the CCJ against me at the older one.

 

The court explained it would be £150 for a hearing and couldn't really give me any information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep usual. Carter trick

 

What was the debt then?

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope nothing

 

thought it might be a cat or mobile debt.

 

get an sar running to shop direct

bet its mostly penalty fees and their ppi

 

when was it opened any idea?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Dx,

 

What would I be hoping for on this?

 

I'm just reading up on it now. I never did sign any agreement with them, if that makes any difference.

 

It would have been opened around 2008/9. I'm going through old letters (They've got my new address, last letter seems to be 2014)

 

Aside from the basic information about this, what else should I be expecting to hear back?

 

Do I forget about Lowells/Carter/the courts for the time being

or would I send similar to Lowell's asking them to prove that I've made contact/payment within the last 6 years?

 

Once again, thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Dx,

 

What would I be hoping for on this? - fees unlawfully levied and p'haps their version of PPI

and ofcourse payment history or your last use of the account

 

I'm just reading up on it now. I never did sign any agreement with them, if that makes any difference. - sadly no, its post Apr 2007

It would have been opened around 2008/9. I'm going through old letters (They've got my new address, last letter seems to be 2014)

- as it post apr 2007, then it would be automatic electronic sign up on your 1st order.

- so they knew your new address, that's promising, why did they file the CCJ against an old one - looking good for a set aside.

Aside from the basic information about this, what else should I be expecting to hear back? as above.

Do I forget about Lowells/Carter/the courts for the time being

or would I send similar to Lowell's asking them to prove that I've made contact/payment within the last 6 years?

- that's a diff one, the CCJ was attained within a month, they could get bailiff involved.

but nothing on the fact they've got the CCj from them yet?

 

Once again, thanks.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowells would have added their own fees etc but most will have been added by shop direct in late payment fees and possibly ppi, the SAR will show it all when you have all the relevant statements from shop direct

  • Confused 1

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, edited my post as realised I would be sending of different letters.

 

I'll get them sent out and see what they say and do some more reading.

 

I'll update hopefully once I've heard back.

Even though this may take some time (40 days to hear back) I don't need to worry about a time limit on response seeing as I wouldn't have known about the old letters/address?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd not for the mo send anything to lowlife/carter

Might be a bit of a gamble

Let's see

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok just an update,

 

I've scoured through the letters and I have many, many letters from Lowell with the same debts.

 

The one in question is £559.57,

the CCJ is for £756.32 (inc fees) this has to be the one,

although from the looks of things the latest one I have is August 2014.

They have indeed written to my current address.

 

I'm going to sort out the SAR letter now for shopdirect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

A long awaited bump.

 

My request for the SAR has come back but they've not included what I'm after,

instead Shopdirect have told me they've been trying to reach me via telephone and email to discuss my SAR request, then they say;

 

"I can complete the DSAR but rather than sending you the unnecessary information I would be grateful if you could supply me with a current telephone number/email address and confirm when you would like me to contact you. Alternatively, contact me on (insert number), so we can proceed with your request.

 

If you require information regarding PPI only we can refund your £10 fee and give you full details on all accounts held with us."

 

What would be the best course of action here, obviously I need everything in writing but this has confused me somewhat.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...