Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you. They insisted that they claim they have an "allocated settlement" figure per day. Make a note of this and make sure it gets into your witness statement and onto the judge. This is a scandal and even more evidence of the abuse of the system. It has nothing to do with justice. It is purely economic's for them. Once again, insist on seeing their contract with Packlink. You shouldn't take their word for anything without evidence. Also standby as I will post a link to a similar case where a very interesting discovery has been made about Packlink's terms and conditions and how Evri are responsible to you in any event. We are applying for judgement on that. It will take about six weeks. I'm sure it will be available by the time you go to trial. Also, it is outrageous that they wasted your time and the mediator's time agreeing to compromise when they already had a fixed sum in mind. This is not about compromise, this is about setting a condition from which they will not move. This is an abuse of the court process. It is an abuse of the mediation process. Make sure it all goes into the witness statement. The judge needs to know  
    • Update: they actually showed up to mediation this time. The mediator seemed pretty understanding that I had a previous claim with Evri last year where they didn't show up to mediation and ended up settling in full before court. And how evri are infamous for following this "dragging out protocol" even when they will lose. Evri spoke the usual speil of my contract is with packlink not them, to which i briefly explain to the mediator the Rights of Third Parties Act 1999 etc. Best they could offer was a "goodwill guesture" of £20 plus covering the court fees so £55 total. Said they have an "allocated settlement amount per day". the mediator could already tell it wasn't going nowhere so we had no deal.
    • The payer is not responsible for registering and making sure that VAT is charged correctly.
    • Thanks for the advice to date..armed and ready to go
    • pers id be writing back pointing out the parking tickets are private land cannot ever be FINES. dx  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowells response to numerous cat debt CCA requests


LCB
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3195 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I recently wrote to Lowells sending a CCA request following notification that they had purchased several catalogue debts from 'Shop Direct'

which I had to stop paying a few months ago.

 

 

The debts to each catalogue are of varying amounts from about £1500 to about £3,000 from memory.

 

They have responded today saying that they have requested a copy of the original agreement

but had sent me a letter of assignment which they claim fulfils their legal obligations.

 

I would like to ask whether they are legally obliged to send me the original credit agreement

and what further action they can take

 

 

.I own my own home.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on the date the CCA was originally issued. They need to respond to your CCA request, with either a copy or reconstituted version. But in regard to enforcement in a court, if the CCA was issued before April 2007, they need the original or copy of it, if you defended the claim. For CCA's issued from April 2007 onwards they don't need the original or copy of it to enforce, only evidence that you owe the debt.

 

While the CCA request is still outstanding they should not try to enforce by issuing a court claim, but it is not unknown. Make sure you send a CCA request per debt.

 

Be aware that Lowells do use Bankruptcy and if you owe more than the threshold, which is £750 now, but increases to £5k in October, that they may consider this. But under CCA rules, Lowells should exhaust all other methods e.g CCJ, before they should use Bankruptcy.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for your prompt reply.I will look at my paperwork to determine the exact amounts I owe each catalogue.That is interesting to know that the threshold increases to 5k from October.Does this mean that if the combined amounts of each catalogue do not exceed 5k then they cannot bankrupt me or is it calculated on a per catalogue basis ie each one treated as a seperate debt?

If they cannot bankrupt me then could they put a charge on my property and perhaps force me to sell to pay the debt?

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

" They have responded today saying that they have requested a copy of the original agreement but had sent me a letter of assignment which they claim fulfills their legal obligations."

 

:nono: You didn't request a Notice of Assignment.....therefore they remain in default (12+2) days to respond and have not fulfilled their Legal obligations.As UB states make sure you send one per agreement...retain proof of postage and file safely.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy.Yes I have done this and sent one request for each catalogue and have retained my proof of postage.I believe it may now have gone over the 12 plus two days time now,however I am not sure how they can now legally proceed?The debt was taken out less than two years ago I think and so is post 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think it is either one debt or combined value of £5k. Lowells do collect debts belonging to one debtor and attempt to enforce.

 

From what i have seen recently, Lowells will look to get a CCJ first and yes if you did not pay they could use Bankruptcy. My understanding is that armed with an unpaid CCJ or CCJ's totalling at least £5k, that they could go straight for Bankruptcy. They would not bother for a charging order, when they could force the sale of the house as part of Bankruptcy.

 

There are a few example cases on here, where debts of a few thousand, have ended up with £30k being owed, as the Bankruptcy costs added can be huge. So you would be mad to let it get that far. If they supply the CCA's, you should come back for more advice.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I certainly don't intend to let it get that far.If they can legally enforce the debt then I am intending to offer reduced monthly repayments but I would do this before it gets to the ccj stage as I dont want any more stress.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...