Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes I have read to ignore anything unless it says Letter of claim  I was just updating stating what I’d received and was asked to upload it  they can keep writing 
    • Steady on, that’s almost as blunt as my response I’m just not sure the OP is going to get the answer / “nuanced response” it seems they were hoping for ……..
    • My mind is a blur so i cant recall exactly what the judge said at the end, but he mentioned that he would be making an order for Evri to make payment to me. I wasn't sure if the court order will also be provided to me, either by post or email - if anyone can shed some light please?
    • Agree with everyone here it's bang to rights. Looks like you just slightly jinked left in order to go right. Ultimately, your time saving attempt is going to cost you as I don't think you have any grounds to appeal. I'd just pay the charge and chalk it up to experience.
    • Thank you everyone!  thought to share some points from my experience in court today that may help others who are taking Evri to court: The judge sets out how the hearing will go and how each party should behave; while i was certainly feeling anxious/nervous ahead of the hearing (and I'm sure @jk2054 may have also observed this), the judge really does try to put any non-legal persons at ease; refrain from talking to the other party and instead speak to the judge if you have any questions/responses; the judge and the advocate spoke about tort of negligence - i wasn't sure how this applied to my case but the judge was questionning the advocate about this so i chose to stay out of this; the judge made reference to a historical case of Donaghue v Stevenson which established a duty of care; the judge observed that some of the points in Evri's witness statement by george wood needed cross examination but george was not present today for questionning; While i was claiming 8% interest, the judge pointed out that is the upper limit and that today, savings accounts give 4-5%. I therefore opted for 5% interest which was agreed to by the judge and the advocate; above all else, ensure you know your court bundle and have any notes to help you refer to specific sections - it helped me to structure my answers to the judge/defendant's queries, and point to specific evidence where i was asked to prove e.g., the value of the item. @honeybee13 - yes, will confirm when payment is received. I have emailed the Evri.claims email with my bank details and also provided them after the hearing to the advocate. @BankFodder message received and i am replying to it
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

provident/ lowell help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3128 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

after requesting the statements a number of times from Lowell i have received a number of letters back, here is a timeline of them...

 

22nd July

 

Acknowledge letter i sent asking for full set of statements, lowell states they have requested statements and that they will be sent to me upon receipt

 

4th August

 

Letter states they have ordered statements, states account will be put on hold, states in the meantime there is no need to contact them again.

 

14th September

 

Letter states despite previous correspondents they have not received payment or valid reason for non payment... Failure to resound... etc...

Yet they told me in previous letter there was no need to contact them again!!!

 

21st september

 

Claiming they have provided me with info i requested... If i don't contact them within 7 days... etc..

 

yet i have still not received all the information i requested in the original CCA request in 2014!

 

 

The only things that i received, apart from their constant letters and numerous ignored phone calls on my home and mobile numbers, were the 2 badly photocopied front pages of the credit agreements.

 

just wondering what my next step should be with regards to Lowell as they still do not seem to have complied fully with my original 2014 CCA request, also saying they would put the account on hold and now ignoring that and starting the 'pay up or else' letters again.

 

as always any help would be appreciated.

 

thanks for your time

Edited by ITPR
added extra
Link to post
Share on other sites

You IGNORE them, the reason why they're sending you their computer generated garbage is because you've been rattling their cage.

 

IF they have failed to comply with your CCA request, then there is nothing for you to do but sit on your hands, and collate all of their

foolish missives they send begging for money.

Also keep a diary of events regarding their harassment via phone, with a view of reporting them to the police for the criminal offence of

harassment, you should also send them this http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?387367-Harassment-by-Telephone-**Update-21st-April-2014** obtain 'proof of posting' which is free from the PO counter, and send it 2nd class post, you don't want them thinking this is of any importance or urgency to you.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

????????

 

 

why are you waiting for statements from lowells?????

 

 

you were told to send the sar to the original creditor!!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

[ATTACH=CONFIG]60233[/ATTACH]

 

 

 

 

i sent a SAR request to provident late august with the standard £10 cheque... stupidly it was not sent recorded... it did have proof of postage but the receipt has been lost. i have not heard anything back from provident and the cheque has not been cashed

 

since the 4th august when i received a letter from lowel saying there was no need to contact them and they was putting the account on hold, i have had 4-5 letters still saying the debt is still unpaid and they haven't heard back from me!!!

 

today i received another letter from lowell with the header 'Pre-Legal Assessment'

 

i am going to have to cancel the cheque i originally sent to provident and send off another with a new SAR request, this time recorded!!!

 

what should i do with regards to the latest letter lowell sent me?

 

should i write to them telling them to hold off any action until i get the info i requested from provident... although the letter i received in august states they are putting my account on hold... they really need to make up their mind.

 

as always any help is appreciated

 

thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, and purely IMO, that missive is just another silly threatogramme they have in their puerile armoury.

 

Doesn't say WILL anywhere, just rambles on about what 'would' happen if they stopped willy waving.

 

Their 'pre legal' letters come from their 'pre school' department.

 

There is no need to tell them anything other than send off the SAR (£10 & RD :thumb:) then wait for the info to arrive.

 

The only time to contact Lowlifes is 'IF' they send court papers.

 

P.S. these letters are computer generated, and are spat out at regular intervals which they have no control over, less for telling the computer to stop, the only time anyone from lowlifes will know where abouts you are in their threat cycle is when you ring and they look at the computer in front of them, then read from their script.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...