Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NPower / wilkins deceptive action to ensure default CCJ??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3267 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi! I'm new here so please bare with me!

 

 

I've had an ongoing issue with NPower which has escalated to such a stressful level I am now on antidepressants.

 

 

After 4 years of NPower producing incorrect bills I finally switched energy companies In 2012.

There was an arrears of £500 on the account and after 3 months of waiting for a final bill

NPower said I owed £795 which I queried for about 5 months before they settled on £745

which I continued to dispute until April 2014

when I had just had enough because I couldn't find anyone to help me dispute this on top of being unemployed.

 

after months of explaining I could not afford to pay this amount immediately

I was bullied into arranging an unaffordable payment arrangement of £20/month.

 

 

At the time I had a monthly deficit of £550 so this just wasn't at all affordable and I struggled to meet these payments

but always communicated when I was able to meet the payment.

I did however pay more than the agreed when I could and by January 2014 the outstanding amount was £500.

 

Even after discussing this with NPower they still found it necessary to instruct their solicitors Wilkin Chapman LLP to issue court proceedings

if I was unable to pay the full sum within 14 days.

 

Again I explained my situation with Wilkin Chapman and produced a full income and expenditure document showing my deficit.

There was no question of a doubt that they were fully aware of my circumstances.

I made a token payment of £50 leaving a remaining total of £450 and was bullied into making a payment arrangement of £20/Month

as they said their client (NPower) would not accept anything lower than this

and would follow through with court proceedings if this was not paid.

 

 

In March 2015 I advised Wilkin Chapman that I would not be able to meet my payment arrangement for that 6/8 weeks due to family bereavement

and the fact that my invoices from work had not been paid. This they now claim to have no reference of.

 

Wilkin Chapman followed with Court proceedings in April; and

 

 

as soon I received the court documents I called and made an offer to pay something to avoid court action

but they refused payment and advised that in order to stop court proceedings I would have to pay a total of £538.

 

 

I was unable to pay this so believed my only option was to return the admission form back to them.

I both emailed and posted the forms back to Wilkin Chapman on Friday 1st May and have receipt of both being delivered

and signed for on Tuesday 5th May.

 

 

On Saturday 15th May I received a CCJ (Default due to non response) from the Court asking for an immediate payment of £668.65 forthwith.

Wilkin Chapman had failed to forward my admission form to the courts which resulted in this default.

 

Wilkin Chapman have explained that their client (Npower) had advised them not to return the documents to the court.

 

However, The Court have stated that the solicitors should have sent my admission form back to the court

and allowed them to come to a decision if one could not be made by the claimant.

 

Wilkin Chapman LLP have now asked me to forward a sum of £693.21 to be paid immediately.

Although the original debt was for £450, with the interest added brought it to £538

and court costs total £130 bringing the forthwith sum to £668.

 

NPower customer service team have advised that Npower have sided with their solicitors behaviour

and accept that they may have acted illegitimately forcing me into further financial hardship.

 

 

NPower have refused to accept a sum of £668.65 to clear my debt (my neighbours have rallied together and offered £500 towards the debt)

and to add insult to injury ended the phone call with "if you fail to repay the amount of £693.21 we will proceed with collection measures."

 

I just don't know what to do now!

The courts have advised that they can remove the CCJ from my credit file if I pay £668 by 10th June 2015

but NPower and Wilkin Chapman LLP have refused to take this amount

and want all their legal costs paid on top of the forthwith total on the CCJ.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you biggest mistake here is continuing to converse on the phone

and is prob your route cause of all the issues.

 

just for you ref

 

whenever you get a claimform

 

you DEAL WITH THE COURT ONLY.

 

always ack the claim on time

and always request documents the claimant intend to rely upon via CCA/CPR if applicable]

 

you should have sent the form to the court not the spoofing sols.

 

anyway

the admission form would not have stopped the CCJ even if sent to the court directly

 

it would still have allowed them to get the defaulted judgement - you didn't defend anything.

 

I think your best cause of action is to get I think the variation form into the court

and get a monthly payment setup through the court.

 

then once that is settled we can look at attacking npower if necessary

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm thinking the energy ombudsman will be your best route in bringing down Npower.

 

But deal with getting that variation order in to the court first...

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the response guys.

 

 

I was advised by the courts to send documents directly to the solicitors.

It also stated on the forms to send back admission forms to the solicitors not the courts.

 

 

I'm not disputing the CCJ more the action NPower and Wilkin Chapman have taken.

The court will remove the CCJ if I pay the CCJ amount of £668

but NPower and Wilkin Chapman are refusing to take payment allowing me to remove CCJ. .

 

 

I don't want to enter any payment arrangements with these ******s as they are untrustworthy

and I don't trust that there won't be bailiffs at my house.

 

 

Can anyone advise how I can force them to take my payment of £668.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have their refusal to accept full payment in writing, or is this just over the phone?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you are paying the full claim figure

 

 

you can do that directly to the court.

 

 

simply bypass the claimant / npower all together as far as I know

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK just did a bit of searching, have a read of this https://www.gov.uk/county-court-judgments-ccj-for-debt/if-you-do-owe-the-money-pay-the-judgment

 

You’ll have to pay the person or business you owe the money to, or their solicitor. The name and address will be on the judgment form. Don’t pay the court.

Make sure you can prove you’ve paid. Send a cheque or postal order by post, or make a bank transfer. Don’t send cash through the post.

Keep a record of your payments and make sure you pay in time.

 

Well, every day's a school day as they say!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

he he

 

 

one each then BB [re cpr]

 

 

sorry op gaff info from me

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, just checked.

 

 

I can set aside the judgement as I believe the judgement had been authorised incorrectly (ie the solicitors lied, and said I didn't return the forms).

 

 

Thankfully I have an email from Wilkin Chapman saying they recieved the forms on 5th May

and also Royal Mail tracking says my forms were delivered and signed for on Tuesday 5th May.

 

 

I'm just wondering if I set aside the claim and ask for a court hearing,

if I could just pay the £450 I owe and let the court know the debt has been settled?

 

 

Does that make sense or do you think there is better way around it?

 

 

Thanks for your help everyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...