Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have they actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
    • Am in the middle of selling my house but it's been held up as still showing a change on the property from welcome finance, have not had any contact from them for years or prime credit and need this sorting asap
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Issued Fixed Penalty Notice for shoplifting - i dont think it is fair - can i appeal?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3379 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I'm not sure if there is anything that can be done, but I thought I'd check.

 

 

My wife does our weekly shop in Tesco's using their scan and shop service,

where you scan your items and pack them into bags and then pay at the till at the end.

She has done this for over a year with no issues at all until last Friday (23/01/15).

 

My wife did the shopping as normal but put a pack of Pampers Night Pants (£5.97) into a bag which she ended up not using otherwise.

 

 

As a result, she inadvertently failed to pay for them. She left the store but didn't even reach the car before she realised her mistake.

 

Turning around, she walked back into the store to pay for them.

As soon as she stepped inside, a security guard took her aside and asked to check her shopping.

 

 

She tried to explain her mistake, but the guard led her into a back office and called the police.

 

 

Upon their arrival the police viewed the CCTV and even the police officer admitted

that she looked as though she was coming back into to pay for the item.

 

Unfortunately, because the item was over £5 Tesco policy was to involve the police,

so my wife has ended up receiving a police caution

and a Fixed Penalty Notice for £90, over a £6 item that my wife was coming back in to pay for!

 

 

We've paid the Penalty Notice, but

 

 

I was wondering if this is something we should have (or even still could) challenged?

 

 

I mean, they say crime doesn't pay, but it seems in this case, neither does honesty!

 

Any advice or suggestions would be greatly appreciated,

 

 

as I am unable to work and recieve medical benefits and my wife is my carer,

 

 

so £90 is a lot to lose for an honest mistake.

 

Thanks in advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

She can't "appeal" as such

- the penalty notice is in effect an offer to avoid prosecution by paying £90.

 

 

She had the option of declining it and opting for a court appearance instead

- and if she'd done that the prosecution would have had to prove, to a criminal standard,

that she took the nappies with dishonest intent

- difficult I would have thought if she was coming straight back in to pay for them.

 

 

However it's worth mentioning that if she'd gone down that route she would have been risking a much harsher penalty,

and a criminal record, if she had been convicted of shoplifting.

 

 

In any event though it's academic now as by paying the penalty notice she accepted it,

and that's the end of the matter.

 

 

There's not much she can do now except chalk it down to experience and shop somewhere else in future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

She can't "appeal" as such - the penalty notice is in effect an offer to avoid prosecution by paying £90. She had the option of declining it and opting for a court appearance instead - and if she'd done that the prosecution would have had to prove, to a criminal standard, that she took the nappies with dishonest intent - difficult I would have thought if she was coming straight back in to pay for them. However it's worth mentioning that if she'd gone down that route she would have been risking a much harsher penalty, and a criminal record, if she had been convicted of shoplifting. In any event though it's academic now as by paying the penalty notice she accepted it, and that's the end of the matter. There's not much she can do now except chalk it down to experience and shop somewhere else in future.

 

Also worth pointing out that accepting the FPN will not raise an entry on a DBS file (the old CRB check)

- even an arrest and charge for theft (even if later disproved in court) might be disclosed in future if your wife needed a clean record for a relevant job application or to enter certain countries as a visitor.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, because the item was over £5 Tesco policy was to involve the police,

 

That is NOT Tesco policy!

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

quite probably!

 

 

the police have fined me already

 

 

go bugger off!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might want to make a formal complaint about how the incident was handles to the ceos office and that they have undermined your trust and confidence in the tesco brand and that you would like to know what they propose to do about it.

 

Also

 

Press?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd love to take this to the press, but my wife is horribly embarrassed by this and just wants ít all to be over with. She won't even go back to Tesco now, we've switched supermarkets. Which is a shame, because we use our clubcard points for day trips etc.

 

However I do like the idea of making a formal complaint, as that won't necessarily be a public thing. Are there any threads with templates for complaints etc?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...