Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks dx for your kind words. I plan to renew my season ticket and write a new begging letter as following, can I ask for any suggestion about it?   Dear Investigator/Prosecutor,   Thank you for your reply. I deeply regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused.   I’m extremely remorseful for my crime. and regret it everyday. I often ask myself ‘’how can I do that thing just because I felt it is interesting. There are a lot of crimes in the world, but feeling it’s interesting is certainly not a reason to crime. I should not crime with any reason.’’ I think about these things every day, and I understand that I can’t blame anyone but myself.   I thanks to the staff who stopped me, as this is a valuable lesson in my life. I told myself that I should never ever repeat such a thing again, and never ever do anything which is possible to be in breach of any law. As a result, I carefully tap my oyster card every time before I enter the station now. I remind myself that I did a wrong thing before, and I should never let it happen again.   Although my monthly travel expenses do not warrant a season ticket, but I just renew my season ticket (please see the attachment). I understand that a crime cannot be truly compensated for, but purchasing a season ticket offers me a small measure of comfort, knowing that my actions caused a loss to the public interest.   I received an email which ask me to negotiate being class teacher in this summer (please see the attachment). I hope that I could teach the lovely students again, which may not be allowed with a criminal record. I would please ask that you would please provide me a single opportunity to settle all outstanding sums owed outside of court without the need for legal proceedings which would have a determinantal impact on my teaching career.   I sincerely apologise again for my crime. If you need anything further from me to help you please let me know.    Yours sincerely,
    • You did what??? You asked them to send you the documents that without them you had  a 100% ironclad win in Court. Why on earth would you do that? As it happens in this case, there is still enough mistakes in their PCNs and the NTH to have your case cancelled. Amd it may be that not sending those documents in the first place along with the ICO complaint and the letters from Alliance themselves which would confirm by the dates on the letters may be enough to cancel it anyway. I hope you have kept their letters as evidence? The chances are that Alliance will not actually take you to Court because of their errors but you never know.  You have made so much extra work for yourself in your WS if they decide to push their luck.though. Can you please post up their letter where they give the reason why I wasn't sent with the NTH.
    • I'm not sure that I fully agree with my site team colleague above.  My understanding is that there is nothing to stop you recording but it is strictly for your own personal use.   
    • I live in a student house, with 5 tenants, unihomes is our utilities provider, who we each have a direct debit set up with and have paid each bill every month. Two letters were sent in my name by BWLegal saying I had two outstanding payments due adding up to over £3500, I have tried to contact british gas (as that is apparently our houses provider) as well as Unihomes. Nothing has helped and BWlegal are pursuing legal action if these debts are not resolved by the 1st May. What do I do? I've called Bwlegal when i bring up that the debt isnt for me and for unihomes they hang up on me. so I am stressed and do not know what to do
    • cant do either if its not in a public place or on your land. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Constant Equita and Capita letters/doorstop visits for previous tenants


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3394 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I keep getting constant letters and doorstop visits from Equita and Capita for previous tenants.

 

 

I have put 'not known at this address' on nearly 30 of them and back in the post box.

 

 

I have opened the door to one of them and told him that this is the previous tenant and

he asked for the name on the council tax bill and

said he will remove it from the records.

 

 

The letters still keep coming though for another previous tenants parking fines.

 

Today I decided to ring them up as I have had enough of these damn letters coming in the post.

 

 

The Equita phone number requires you to type in the reference number and pin of the case before you can speak to anyone

so I typed in what was on the 'delivered by hand' letter, and then 'other enquiries'

but after all that 'all agents busy' and the line went dead.

 

 

I would never talk to them by phone if the debt was mine but this time it is the PREVIOUS occupant

and last time this happened, the only time I got the letters for old tenants to stop was when I told them over the phone.

 

Will they call me back as I called off the landline thinking I'm this guy because I put in his reference number?

 

 

If they do call back and my partner answers she won't know what to do and I don't want her roped into anything by them,

especially because this debt is nothing to do with us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

phone the relevant council and complain

 

 

equita/capita are the farmed out franchise for many councils

you wont get any hep from them.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might be worth moving this to the bailiff forum, as Equita will try to make you pay the debt and their fees

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok

 

Do you mean the council that is chasing this guy for the debt or my local council? I would have to open one of these letters to get that councils details as the 'delivered by hand' letter states it is relation to parking fines in London (I live in Birmingham)

Link to post
Share on other sites

the issuing council

 

 

you could always go do a statutory declaration if this don't work.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I phoned up the London council which is the one that is after the previous tenants parking fines and after speaking to about 10 different people she said they can find nobody who can deal with removing the address for that tenant from their records and that they wouldn't be able to do it anyway without speaking to the debtor first to arrange a payment plan. I have no idea who the debtor is so how am I supposed to get him on the phone to speak to them?

 

The letters for the parking fines have now slowed down from London, but some more letters have arrived from some driving fines owed to a Yorkshire council! Every single one of these letters and 'delivered by hand' notes and court letters is addressed to the same person who used to live here. My partner is terrified of them coming in and removing our goods even though I have told her that even if it was OUR debt the bailiffs don't have the power.

 

How would I do a statutory declaration?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go to a solicitor and commissioner for oaths, the cost is around a tenner, you could put in it that the named debtor vacated the premises on or around XX/XX/2014 or whatever and you have no details of their forwarding address but you are not liable for any debts of the named debtor.

 

Or something like that. You should get several notarised copies to send to the councils and to show any chancer bailiff fetching up at the door asking for or trying to take your goods.for the third party debt.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

 

Hmm, seems a lot to go through just to get through to them that this person doesn't live here anymore. I mean surely everyone and anyone who moves house must have debts and letters and stuff arrive for previous tenants. Is it purely and simply that this persons fines/debts are to do with parking and driving offenses and involve the council as to why they don't just accept the 'Not known at this address' returned letters and take this address off their records?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

 

Hmm, seems a lot to go through just to get through to them that this person doesn't live here anymore. I mean surely everyone and anyone who moves house must have debts and letters and stuff arrive for previous tenants. Is it purely and simply that this persons fines/debts are to do with parking and driving offenses and involve the council as to why they don't just accept the 'Not known at this address' returned letters and take this address off their records?

 

There is no money in it for them in fees and charges, and cash for their bailiffs who will want the innocent to pay if they can persuade them to do so if they actually accepted the evidence from the new resident. Cynical? right on.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

 

Hmm, seems a lot to go through just to get through to them that this person doesn't live here anymore. I mean surely everyone and anyone who moves house must have debts and letters and stuff arrive for previous tenants. Is it purely and simply that this persons fines/debts are to do with parking and driving offenses and involve the council as to why they don't just accept the 'Not known at this address' returned letters and take this address off their records?

 

The sad fact is that bailiff companies receive hundreds of letters daily marked 'gone aways' and apparently, many are found to be false when a personal visit is made.

 

I appreciate that it is a lot of trouble to go to but, my personal opinion would be to get a simple Statutory Declaration drafted and sworn by a solicitor (cost of £5) and send a copy if you receive another letter from a firm of bailiffs. This suggestion depends on how many letters you are receiving but given that you have gone to the trouble to post a question here then clearly this situation is causing problems to your family.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can also include a copy of this years CT invoice as well as that above.

 

 

Check to see if the previous tenant is still on the electoral role if so get it removed.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I would keep a record of any phone calls and not return any further letters that are delivered.

Then I would write to whoever is sending these letters by recorded delivery and tell them you are not the named person and to stop the letters. You can say that any further receipt will be classed as harassment and further action will be taken.

You could include a copy of your council tax bill as proof.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...