Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • yes they mostly would be enforceable, but that wasnt the point. even if they get a CCJ the very worst they could have done is get a restriction k which is useless to them. doesnt hurt anything. the CCJ would remain on file for 6yrs yes, but then gone same as a DN. the rest k charge does not show at all. and even so, the idea was to get your debts issued a default notice ASAP, them RESUME payments.. the advise is NOT conflicting, just you don't read things properly or understand.  oh well. dx
    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
    • might of been better to have got them all defaulted 2yrs ago as we carefully explained before then you'd already be 1/3rd there and your current issue would not be one.    
    • No doubt the hotel will have security cameras on the floor you were staying to confirm or deny the allegation??   The only compensation you will probably get, which will be discretionary as a goodwill gesture, will be a credit voucher for the entire hotel group. Very much doubt anything more than that as you have not substantiated, the hotel committed the transgression 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Mortimer claim form - citi 'debt'


connect4
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3484 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone

Received claim form from Northampton CC Claimant being Cabot and solicitors are Mortimer Clarke

Date of issue – . 16/9/14

 

I have AOS the claim.

I have sent a CCA request to Cabot and

they have replied with a similar letter as others have stated on here

ie; they do not have the information on file and anticipate it will take 40 days.

 

 

i sent CPR 31.14 request to Mortimer Clarke and

they sent a letter stating they are taking their clients instructions in relation to my request

and that they also agree to the extension of 28 days for me to file defence.

 

Here is the POC

 

By an agreement between Citifinancial("CFE") and the defendant on or around **/**/**** date

("the agreement") CFE agreed to issue the Defendant with a credit card upon the terms and conditions set out therein.

 

 

In breach of the agreement the defendant failed to make the minimum payments due and the agreement was terminated.

 

 

The agreement was assigned to the claimant on **/**/2010

 

The claimant therefore claims ( a figure over £10k)

 

Having read through a few threads similar should i use the same type of defence as i need to submit a defence in 4 days

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

we will need to know when you took out this credit card. very rare that citi/cabot are able to produce a reply that complies with s78(1)

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply the old rouge,

I have put answers to the questions you have requested

 

Date of issue – . 16/9/14

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? POC

 

By an agreement between Citifinancial("CFE") and the defendant on or around **/**/2002 ("the agreement")

CFE agreed to issue the Defendant with a credit card upon the terms and conditions set out therein.

In breach of the agreement the defendant failed to make the minimum payments due and the agreement was terminated.

The agreement was assigned to the claimant on **/**/2010

 

The claimant therefore claims 22k

 

What is the value of the claim? £22k

Is the claim for a current or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Credit card

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? 2002

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned to Cabot

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No

Why did you cease payments:- 2009

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementlink3.gif plan? No

Link to post
Share on other sites

£22k!!

 

 

this will be fast tracked then.

 

 

luckily they have no chance in getting a complaint CCA/the right T&C I bet.

 

 

you are not alone

 

 

there are numerous CITI claims by cabot here.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for reply dx. I have looked at some threads to make a defence and I think this maybe ok for me, could you give me an opinion as a defence to the claim, wether i need to add or delete anything.

Regards

 

Defence

 

1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic innature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific responsehas not been made.

 

2. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have no knowledge of any agreement between myselfand Citi financial regarding the credit card

 

3.Paragraph 2 is denied. I have never held an agreement with Citi financial toenable any breach let alone withhold any payments.

 

4. Paragraph 3 is denied I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice ofAssignment.

 

5. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to theClaimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence ofassignment/balance/breach requested by CPR 31. 14, therefore the Claimant isput to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement with the Claimant; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equityto issue a claim;

 

6.As per Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegationthat the money is owed.

 

7. On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is deniedthat the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the Act 1974.

 

 

8 .By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that theClaimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2/3 no..

 

 

you did have a citicard, you cannot deny you ever had 'a' card nor 'an' agreement.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply dx. If i delete paragraph's 2 and 3 and edit paragraph 4 to read "I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice ofAssignment."

would the defence suffice? Or is there anything else I could add?

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to look at recent threads here

 

 

just adapt those to you POC

 

 

however, you have a good few weeks yet.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply dx. If i delete paragraph's 2 and 3 and edit paragraph 4 to read "I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice ofAssignment."

would the defence suffice? Or is there anything else I could add?

Regards

 

There wouldn't really be much of a defence left...you need to adapt it to suit your particulars.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then dont leave them out re draft them to suit your 2 & 3 of your particulars

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Andy, Dx100, the old rouge.

 

I sent my defence in to Northampton CC

they duly replied with a letter confirming receipt of defence

and that a copy would be forwarded to the solicitor of Cabot.

 

 

The letter also states unless the claimant informs the court he wishes to proceed

within 28 days of receipt of my defence the claim will be stayed.

 

On Saturday I received documents from Cabot which includes reconstituted true copy

of credit agreement, statement of account and terms and conditions.

 

 

They claim that this satisfies the obligations set out in section 77-78 of the consumer credit act 1974

and as they have now complied with my request for information

they are now able to enforce the credit agreement which i signed

 

 

and entered into (on all paperwork they sent there is no copy with my signature on )

 

 

Enforcement would mean obtaining a CCJ

however they would prefer to work with me and set up a payment plan to settle the outstanding balance.

 

I would like to ask how to respond to the above?

They have not provided a copy of the signed agreement,

how would this affect them applying for a CCJ?

 

The 28 days from the solicitor receiving my defence would be up about now,

I have not contacted the court yet to see if they have informed the court they wish to proceed.

 

Any comments help would be appreciated

 

Regards

connect4

Link to post
Share on other sites

as this was a 2002 take out

a recon is no good.

 

 

and if you scratch lightly you'll prob find the address

on what you have is not the correct one for where you were at the time of taking out the card

and

I bet the T&C's are not from 2002 either

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply dx.

 

I think the T&C's maybe from 2008 going on one of the citi documents.

 

 

There is also an original CCA and a current CCA.

 

 

If the reconstituted true copy of credit agreement is of no use to them

are they hoping i will call to set up some payment plan?

 

 

I am right in thinking they wouldn't have the correct documents to proceed with the claim?

 

Regards

connect4

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 CCA's?

 

 

have they send the signed one from 2002?

 

 

and the T&C's from 2002

 

 

if not they are stuffed

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have sent copies of 2 CCA's from citi, one 2002 they call the original and one they call the current from 2008. There are no copies of a signed one at all, on all they have sent there is nothing signed by me or copies signed by me.

Regards

connect4

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx. What would you say my next move is? Cabot have given me 14 days to reply to them to make some agreement for a payment plan. I assume that if they have no signed agreement or copy of agreement they will not be replying back to court within the 28 days and the claim will become stayed. Any comments would be appreciated

 

Regards

connect4

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have answered your own question connect:-)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Little point really connect ...if they do/have you would have received a Directions Questionnaire by now.The claim is stayed.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...