Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HFC, no statements so claim rejected, now found them


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3488 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I have been looking around at all the PPI claims and l decided to look through some old banking stuff.

 

I found an old HFC account that l had the agreement for, and the closing statement for it.

 

I filled in the FOS questionnaire and have sent in the copies of the application and the closing statement.

 

This is from 1993 1994 so l do not have any bank statements but the last statement does show that l had use of a limit of £7500 for that year.

 

The original agreement was filled in by the guy in the bank,

he ticked the PPI box in a blue pen and l signed with a black pen.

 

I did not need PPI, it was sold as a must have !!

 

HFC have refused my claim as they say try cannot tell how much PPI l had paid??

 

Do l need to SAR them??

 

I shouldn't have to,,they should have it all.

 

Just seems like they are avoiding paying.

 

They have said l can go to the FOS?

No leaflet included in their letter.

 

What is my best course of action, SAR or FOS complaint.

Thanks

Cups

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

We have know HFC to provide statements/transaction history back as far as 1989/90.

 

When was this account closed?

 

They may have destroyed the account details after six years of the account closure.

 

In principle you should be able to claim the ppi back providing there are records as to how much you paid.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

The account was closed back in 1994, it was an account that was called a current account plus,

l have the agreement which shows it was for 7,500,

it had that limit when l closes it a year or so later.

 

It shows the PPI as a percentage of the balance,

l have the last closing statement but that is all?

 

Should l SAR them??

 

I take it that they would have looked for it?

 

Is it worth complaining if l cannot get the amounts paid in PPI

 

Cups

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

The account was closed back in 1994, it was an account that was called a current account plus, l have the agreement which shows it was for 7,500, it had that limit when l closes it a year or so later. It shows the PPI as a percentage of the balance, l have the last closing statement but that is all?

Should l SAR them??

I take it that they would have looked for it?

Is it worth complaining if l cannot get the amounts paid in PPI

Cups

 

The HFC Current Account Plus was a revolving credit agreement where by you were given a credit limit which you could use. Similar to a credit card but you had a cheque book with it.

 

The amount of PPI paid would have been dependent on the balance on the account from time to time and would have been applied to the account monthly.

 

In order to work out how much PPI was paid you would need all of the statements so you could try a SAR but whether they have the transaction history is another matter.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

might be useful for your old GM card too if you never got the SAR then

looking at your old threads

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Yes l think l will SAR them and get all the data.

The limit was used as l did use it for a reason, when l repaid it it was at the limit.

The GM card was passed on to someone else,

This was mis sold on the basis l never asked for it. It has the salesman's pen tick not mine. I signed in one colour, he did everything else in his pen. Also l did not need it. I have not got the PPI booklet but from others that l have l can see that l would have been excluded because of other reasons!!

Thanks

Cups

Link to post
Share on other sites

GREAT

 

go nail 'em

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

FOS them?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, complain to the FOS? They have said that they cannot work out how much l have paid as l have failed to provide them with statements?? They have stopped short of saying that they do not have any, just that they cannot do anything unless l provide them with said statements??

All very strange.

Cups

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope you cant complain to the FOS yet until their final response later on.

 

dont fire your bullets yet

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats typical stick waving from hfc

 

well they will be hearing from you - they'll be getting an SAR!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hi,

 

 

I put in a claim for a rebate of PPI on an old HFC loan account that l had with HFC Bank for just about a year, back in 1992 /1993.

 

 

I then sent it off to the FOS when HFC rejected it.

 

 

HFC said that they had no statements and that the only one that l could produce showed a closing PPI payment for the last couple of days of 69p

so they offered that and the FOS said that is all they could do.

 

 

That decision was last year, and l just sucked it up

 

 

I have been helping my dad out at home who has just retired, and for some reason some of my corries are in his house???

Including a full set of statements for this account, showing nearly £400 worth of PPI paid.

 

 

I am making the claim because it was ticked by the HFC salesman who said that l had to have it,

and also my empolyment status would have imvalidated any claim.

 

 

So l have sent it off to HFC with a covering letter asking them to reconsider,

particularly in light of their original offer of repayment,

albeit only the 69p l could prove.Is it too late??

 

 

ThanksCups

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well yes it is too late to ask whether it's too late cos you've already sent it off. But as it happens, no it's not too late to reclaim.

 

Hope you read up on here about calculation basis or you could end up still missing out.

 

In future it would probably be a good idea to take advice before making complaints / queries, rather than after.

Link to post
Share on other sites

cups, did you complete a spread sheet so you know how much you should be receiving back ?

 

Please tell me that you did NOT send them the original statements - only copies ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...