Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

redress after admitting they should never have sold me PPI


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3565 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been told by every single company/bank i had protection with

that due to being self employed it would never have benefitted me

.I have all the offer letters sat here 7 of them

 

Heres the rub and I suppose I'm seeing it only from my POV but

 

I was sold this on advice ,

I mentioned I was starting a buisness and told that it would cover me if the company ran into trouble ,peace of mind etc ,

 

 

when it did run into trouble and I tried to claim this led to me being in the finacial mess ,

 

 

I lost my house ,Car the lot because none of these policies were valid,

no money no payment no roof essentially was the chain of events despite being told i was protected

 

So the culmination of events cost was far more than the paltry 1000 quid here or there I'm being offered,

 

 

could I now claim damages after all the insurance would not have covered me and i had done all i could to protect myself leading up to this?

 

The wording on the letters states I accept this as full and final redress for the PPI

and in signing i can take no further action (Natwest in particular)in relation to this,

 

 

surely this cannot be correct they have admitted they were wrong and now owe me the money i shouldn't have paid in the first place?

 

In reality (or maybe im daydreaming here)

the redress would be to put me back in the financial position I was in ,

where if i had been financially covered i would still be living in a house

and had time to find a new position without being placed in such an untenable position it was literally hell on earth trying to get out of.

 

the irony of it was the letter i received stating after 1 months missed payments that my insurance was now null and void .

..you couldn't make it up plus there was literally hundreds in charges both bank and credit card for missed and late payments

 

 

eventually I just dissapeared I had no address for them to send threatening letters or abode

 

 

it took years to get back on my feet before the letters started appearing, too late BARRED BY STATUTE WAS THE REPLY

 

Any ideas or advice would be greatfully received or am i just after an unlikely revenge, should i just let sleeping dogs lie

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think if you could prove this you'd have a strong case.

 

 

have you all the documentation from the various sales?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx

 

i have the documentation and a witness from when is et up the PPI with natwest

as we had actually been into the bank to try and get a buisness bank account for the LTD company,

 

the buisness manager was selling mortgage cover ill health the whole raft was thrust upon me

and my matey who got away by the skin of his teeth because he banked elsewhere

 

I also have a letter from UK insurance limited stating, well telling me to get lost in not so many words

that does state i would never have been eligible to take out the insurance

and i should stop bothering them and take it up with nat west as they sold me the policy,

this dates back to 2003

 

I must add however i so hope there is a case and it opens the floodgates for others,

those people made my life hell after wards with their debt cashing

and if they have done this to me how many others has this happened to ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...