Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Will get them done asap My job changes week to week so at the time I didn’t know. 
    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claimform Mortimer/Cabot - Online/Carcraft car Financial 'debt'


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3553 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i all,

 

This is my first post, so please bear with me.

 

Today I have received a notification of court summons by Mortimer Clark Solicitors for a Cabot Financial Services debt.

 

This dates originally from 2003, when I took out a car finance with Online Finance, via our old friends, Carcraft.

 

Due to losing my job etc etc, I defaulted on the original loan,

however contacted them to arrange a repayment of the arrears and to set up a new direct debit,

which the provisionally accepted, pending a visit from one of their agents.

I dutifully agreed to meeting them (August 2004), and stayed at home all day awaiting their arrival.

 

They never turned up,

I made several phone calls, to try and pay by debit card over the phone, which was refused,

this went on for a number of months, into early 2005, when

out of the blue, I received a letter stating they were coming to repo the car.

 

 

I agreed that they might as well, and was assured sale price (full market value) would be deducted from the debt.

 

Role on about 6 weeks, I get notification that they sold the car for £1500!

(at the time, I calculated full market value to be in the region of £5700, a 2001, Renault Megane, 1.6i, 5 door with all the trimmmings),

purchase price including interest being around £10300, of which I had paid approx £3000, when the car was repo'd.

 

Roll to 2005 when I got a debt letter for £7300, the original debt,

including interest less what I had paid, but not deducting the sale price,

which I had tried to dispute, but all correspondence was ignored.

 

I set up a debt management plan, and paid for about a year, when I was made redundant, and ended up cancelling it because the firm I was with were useless.

 

Roll to today, 8 years later and I receive this court notification.

 

Please note that I have also moved house approx 8-10 times in this period, and have NEVER acknowledged or responded to any debt collection notices for this debt.

 

The court papers state that Cabot bought the debt on the 30/09/2008,

the court papers issued on the 26/08/2014,

34 days short of 6 years from when they say they purchased the debt!

 

I know that I was getting letters to various addresses from as early as 2005 from Cabot,

usually forwarded by previous landlords, or collected from previous addresses in person,

but always ignored, and never acknowledged.

 

I need some serious and urgent help in compiling the defense, and help in getting this won in my favour, but haven't got long to do it in, 14 days.

 

I regret I have no longer got any documentation regarding the vehicle, sale etc due to house moves etc.

 

Please help me!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Welcome to CAG.

 

 

You need to acknowledge the claim asap. What is the date of issue on the claim form?

Have you checked your credit files yet? If not do so now.

When did the DMP end?

You need to know what the default date is.

Who is the original creditor?

 

 

Please post up a suitably redacted copy of the Particulars of Claim (POC)

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mayhem and welcome to CAG

 

Can you please have a read of the following and answer any questions that you have not already provided the information for.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-April-2014**

 

The legal guys will be along as soon as they are available.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DMP finished in 2005, the claim frm was issued 26.08.2014

The original creditor was Online Finance, via Carcraft

Credit Files, currently getting.

Unable to post claim form, but tell me what you need and I will add it

 

 

Just the particulars of claim section (POC) remove personal identifiers, barcode etc. Just type in verbatim.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The claim is for balance of installments due and unpaid under an agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit act 1974

dated 26.09.2003 and under which Online Finance agreed to sell the Defendant goods for a price payable

by installments ("the agreement")

 

 

The Agreement was assigned to the Claimant on 30.09.2008.

 

PARTICULARS

 

1. Amount unpaid 7045

The Claimant has complied with Section III & IV of Practice Direction - Pre-Action Conduct

The Claimant therefore claims:

1: Amount Due and unpaid: £7045

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? BEFORE

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Account Assigned Debt Purchaser Issuing.

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No notice of Assignment Received to my knowledge

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I can remember - but 9 years is a long time ago!

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No

 

Why did you cease payments:- Loss of job, and disagreed with the sale price of vehicle after repossession

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Yes, they never responded to calls and correspondence, have not had any contact with them since 2005

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementicon plan? Debt Management plan entered into in 2004 and cancelled in 2005 due to DMP being unhelpful, no statements etc,

 

I have checked my Credit File with Experian this morning, and this debt is not listed as active in the last 6 years, and is not on my file...

 

Looking forward to all and any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you aware of the court timetable by which you MUST ahere

 

You have 33 days in total

 

Date of claim form is day one

 

5 days served (inc date of issue) plus 14 days in which to acknowledge

 

Plus 14 days to submit defence -

 

Register on mcol,acknowledge , tick defend all ASAP

 

ASAP send CCA request to claimant

 

CPR31.14 request to claimants solicitors

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ensure you head all correspondence- I Do not acknowledge any debt to yourselves or any company you claim to represent

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no rush to get your defence in...you have by my reckoning until 27 September to do that.

 

Have you sent off the CPR and CCA requests as advised? If not then that is your priority.

 

This looks well statutory barred to me.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

have checked my Experian Credit file and it no longer appears on there.

 

 

About 18 months ago, I contacted Experian reference this debt and they checked the history of it

and flagged it for removal as it was over 6 years old.

 

 

I have not requested the CPR or CCA as yet, will send a letter to MCS on Saturday.

 

 

Even if they have the original CCA it is dated, as per the Court Claim form as 26.09.2003, so 11 years ago.

 

I personally have no records left as multiple house moves and time have caused me to slim down the paper trails I have!

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers I'd get them off

 

 

the only cost is 2 1st class stamps

and ONE £1 BLANK PO for the CCA request

 

 

you can use free proof of posting at the PO counter

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

there is no requirement to make to po payable to anyone.

 

 

this is simply a delaying tactic.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

too late for silly SB letters

 

 

if you are confident it is SB'd

 

 

then file the SB defence available on here now on MCOL.

 

 

you can name the payee on the PO of the CCA and send it back if you wish.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...