Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The 3 pieces of mortar that fell on the same day, at the same time, were approx. 25-30cm long and weighed around ½-1 kilo each from a roof that is above the 2nd floor; they were by no means tiny pieces of mortar but large chunks falling from a rather great height. I believe the size and weight is enough to cause serious injury and if it falls on your head, I assume it could potentially be lethal if unlucky, but we don't wish to put that theory to test... We can't in good conscience let a contractor install a patio and a gazebo as it is in the exact spot where the mortar fell, nor do I think anyone would be willing to take the chance. Looking at the roof, there are multiple other remaining pieces from the same 'line' or 'row' of mortar that can potentially fall. The mortar is right underneath the slate tiles on the neighbour's roof and I don't know whether the tiles are also (becoming) lose due to the loss of the mortar. I was trying to upload a photo but it seems it's not allowed. The first contractor to work in our garden in preparation for the patio and gazebo is scheduled to start on 10th June, that leaves the neighbour 5 workdays to sort their roof which is unlikely, so it seems we will have to postpone our patio contractor without knowing when they can come back. We have already had extensive work done in the garden in preparation for the wedding reception and it will become very costly for us if we have to move the wedding reception to a venue (if we can even get one at this short notice) rather than have it at home which was our dream.
    • Is this sufficiant for a letter of claim  ? Letter Of Claim       Reference: Techzone Mobile Phones Samsung A71 Mobile Phone £140 Purchase date 29. 5. 24     I the claimant purchased a 2nd hand Samsung A71 mobile from Techzone Mobile Phone unit 10 of the indoor market at the Potteries shopping centre. Initially the phone worked well until I used the camera and found debris in the camera lens spoiling pictures making it not fit for purpose. I contacted the seller who offered a replacement which I initially accepted but later rejected and wanted a refund in full which the seller refused saying they Do Not give refund is unlawful and goes against the Consumer rights act 2015. Therefore I intend to issue proceedings against you in a county court without further notice unless you reimburse me the above amount in Full within 7 days from the date of this Letter     ------------------------------------------    I think its best if i hand him the letter as posting it might not get through so can claim expenses traveling up there ?   or would it be best to just post and get 'Signed for'  ?   Should i also put in the letter of claim interest added or leave that till the Particulars letter ?
    • Ok thanks, I really need help with my mental health over this I’ve called 111 Hi sorry just one more thing can they contact my workplace?
    • Sorry to shatter your leftie dreams 🤣😂🤣😂     Donald Trump gets a SIX-POINT bump in approval after being found guilty on 34 counts according to snap Daily Mail poll: 'I think it was a waste of taxpayer money' WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK Teflon Don rides again, according to an exclusive poll for DailyMail.com which found that the guilty verdict in Manhattan... James Johnson, who conducted the poll, said Trump might be waking up as convicted felon but he was winning over the voters who matter.   Our snap poll of a representative sample of likely voters shows that for most Americans the trial has not changed their deep-set views of Trump,' he said.  'But amongst those who are open to changing their mind, people feel more positive by a margin of 6 points. That is outside of the margin of the error of the poll and we are saying that is significant. 'It extends to Independent voters too. Look at the explanations and it is clear why: people feel it was a politically motivated trial and view Trump as a "fighter" against what they see as injustice.     
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ?  Civil National Business Centre Northampton NN1 2LH Name of the Claimant ?  PRA Group UK Portfolios LTD   How many defendant's  joint or self ?  Just my self Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to.    24th May 2024   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total   Date of issue XX + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = XX + 14 days to submit defence = XX (33 days in total)  if your defence filing date falls on a W/End, you must file by friday @4PM     Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?  The claimant claims the sum of £22,000 for an outstanding debt owed. On 30/1/18 the defendant entered into n agreement with Lloyds Bank Plc for a bank loan under the reference 10017#######. On 4/1/19 the defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of £22,000. On 30/11/22 the debt of £22,000 assigned to PRA Group (UK) Limited, who itself assigned the debt to PRA Group UK Portfolios Ltd on 30/12/23. Notices of assignment were sent to the defendant in accordance with S136 Law of property act 1925. The claimant has instructed PRA Group (UK) Limited to act on its behalf in the recovery of the outstanding debt and to pursue litigation on its behalf. AND the claimant claims 1. The sum of £22,000. What is the total value of the claim?  £23,500 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ?  Yes Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No Did you inform the claimant of your change of address?  No - N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account?  Bank loan When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?  No Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ?  I believe it was done online on their app Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  Yes Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.  Debt was with halifax, whom passed the debt to PRA Group. Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Yes Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?  I'm not completely sure at it was nearly 6 years ago, I have done a CCA request and they have sent a screenshot of their system showing it was sent. Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  Yes Why did you cease payments?  Couldn't afford to make payments. What was the date of your last payment?  August 2018 Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?  No Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan?  No
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Firstplus/Eversheds - going for repo again - help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3560 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

the court date is on the 8th September

 

 

I don't think there is any remit for them to reduce the payments?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

[ATTACH]53068[/ATTACH]

 

Here is a copy of my letter.

 

In case it can't be viewed

 

Dear Sir/Madam

I am writing with reference to my account that I have with First Plus and its current status there are a number of issues that I wish to address.

Firstly, after a period of severe depression for which I am currently receiving medication for, I find that I have now been diagnosed with another illness, type 2 diabetes The ramifications of this is that I am tired and feeling very poorly all the time and until it is controlled I am unable to do overtime, hopefully this is a temporary situation.

The consequences of this for my loan with you are as follows;

I was paying in the region of £55 per month off the arrears that I have with you. Because I am not receiving overtime at the moment I will have to reduce this amount to £35.00 per month off the arrears.

My budget shows that I am still able to make my normal monthly contractual payment of £195 per month and £35 off the arrears which totals £230 per month. I appreciate that this not ideal for us both however my hands are tied.

Looking at my calculation on the sums above I will have paid off my arrears in May 2018 which is before the loan has fully been paid up. I can assure you that will pay this amount each month and tell you when my when my circumstances change when they do change I will prioritise clearing these arrears as quickly as I can. I enclose a copy of my household budget to confirm my situation.

Secondly, I have had a look at my credit file and despite the fact that I have paid you £215 per month for a long period of time you have put default after each payment date. As I am sure you can imagine this has had a damaging effect on my credit file. I would be grateful if the payments that I am making are recorded on my credit file.

I am aware that my illness, my financial status, and my lack of understanding is not your problem and that you are only there to service my account but I would be grateful if you could accept this explanation of my current situation and process these details as soon as possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume that the spreadsheet you have provided is a direct copy from the statements?

 

The PPI refund was made to the account and the balance reduced to some £17,600 from £23,600 so that seems ok.

 

From then on the monthly interest being applied to the account has reduced which again would be correct.

 

So from the PPI point of view it would seem that things have been done correctly.

 

I am sure that the lender should have advised you of interest rate changes over the years but I think you said that they had not.

 

Can you please post that letter that Ell-enn has asked for.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ims21, thank you so much for you help.

 

Please see posting above for the letter that I sent in, informing them of my reduction in arrears payments.

 

Just looking at the figures above they are from the statements sent to me, but I have the computer printout which I will type out this morning and they present a very different story.

 

Once again thank you.

 

2me

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi me2, looking as requested.

Let's clear up the credit report question first, the reason the " D " markers are there is that any " arrangement to pay" is in its self a default of the terms & conditions (payment lower than that contractually required).

 

 

The " D " markers are in fact better than having an "arrangement to pay" (AP) marker showing, this is because the defaulted account will be removed from the record on the 6th anniversary of the default date, the AP markers will stay until the arrangement ends/or the debt is cleared.

 

 

Ims has explained that the figures look ok and I agree.

 

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all again!!!!!!!

 

I am typing all the figures off the computerised sheet but it is taking some time for me to type out. I have attached a sheet of the figures that I am querying

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]53063[/ATTACH]

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you cant click and read your attachments we cant.

 

 

you need to PDF them please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a look at the docs you provided in post #37 together with your previously posted spreadsheet and I can see how they have arrived at their figures.

 

That document appears to be from around February this year.

 

At that point in time you had missed 14 contractual payments at £195.05 = £2,730.70. Against that you had made payments against the arrears of 1 x £10, 27 x £14.95 and 9 x £54.95 which total to £908.20. Take one from the other and you end up with an arrears balance of £1,822.50 which is pretty close to what they say of £1,863.08.

 

As regards your query on the interest rates, these are given on the posted sheet so you should be able to see those over the period of the loan assuming you got one of those sheets for each month.

 

They should have notified you in writing of any interest rate changes I believe but I don't think that in itself is going to be of huge significance in the forthcoming hearing.

 

As regards the amount of the contractual payment, this may indeed be worth a mention to the court.

 

The overriding principle of a PPI reclaim is that the claimant should be put back in the position he would have been in had the PPI not been applied in the first place. Now the way I interpret that is that had you not had PPI in the first place then your contractual payment would have been less. When the PPI refund was made to the account then my view is that the repayment amount should have reduced. This would ensure that the term of the loan would stay the same.

 

Making an increased payment over and above this (for example the amounts you are now paying) would reduce the arrears quicker and potentially shorten the life of the loan.

 

However, it seems from what you say that the lender has not reduced the monthly repayment amount so you are not paying in accordance with being in the position you would have been in had the PPI not been added.

 

Ell-enn will no doubt comment on this because as you have been paying the higher amount of £195 + extra, it could be argued that your arrears balance is inflated and this may well be worth a mention to the court.

 

In fact, given that the repayments would have been £33.97 less each month and up to February you had made 37 payments then the total there is £33.97 x 37 = £1,256.89 which makes an impact on the arrears figure.

 

Finally, on the sheet you posted you queried why the refund cheque they sent you was added to the loan. You have to look at the whole refund situation as a whole. They actually credited the account with the full premium and the interest. They are only allowed to hang on to an amount to clear the arrears so as they credited the whole amount, the reduction in the balance was greater than it should have been and so the cheque refund they made to you shows as a payment out of the account so that the net refund to the account is correct.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a look at the docs you provided in post #37 together with your previously posted spreadsheet and I can see how they have arrived at their figures.

 

That document appears to be from around February this year.

 

At that point in time you had missed 14 contractual payments at £195.05 = £2,730.70. Against that you had made payments against the arrears of 1 x £10, 27 x £14.95 and 9 x £54.95 which total to £908.20. Take one from the other and you end up with an arrears balance of £1,822.50 which is pretty close to what they say of £1,863.08.

 

.

 

ims21 you are a star...

How you calculated that I will never know and I have to say I am in awe

 

Thank you

 

2me2u

Link to post
Share on other sites

As regards your query on the interest rates, these are given on the posted sheet so you should be able to see those over the period of the loan assuming you got one of those sheets for each month.

 

They should have notified you in writing of any interest rate changes I believe but I don't think that in itself is going to be of huge significance in the forthcoming hearing.

 

As regards the amount of the contractual payment, this may indeed be worth a mention to the court.

 

.

 

ims21

 

They have never ever mentioned an increase in the interest rates and that is reflected in the incomplete SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As regards the amount of the contractual payment, this may indeed be worth a mention to the court.

 

The overriding principle of a PPI reclaim is that the claimant should be put back in the position he would have been in had the PPI not been applied in the first place. Now the way I interpret that is that had you not had PPI in the first place then your contractual payment would have been less. When the PPI refund was made to the account then my view is that the repayment amount should have reduced. This would ensure that the term of the loan would stay the same.

 

Making an increased payment over and above this (for example the amounts you are now paying) would reduce the arrears quicker and potentially shorten the life of the loan.

 

However, it seems from what you say that the lender has not reduced the monthly repayment amount so you are not paying in accordance with being in the position you would have been in had the PPI not been added.

 

Ell-enn will no doubt comment on this because as you have been paying the higher amount of £195 + extra, it could be argued that your arrears balance is inflated and this may well be worth a mention to the court.

 

In fact, given that the repayments would have been £33.97 less each month and up to February you had made 37 payments then the total there is £33.97 x 37 = £1,256.89 which makes an impact on the arrears figure.

 

 

Thank you again so much. I have been paying every month I have not missed a payment this year so yes that will have a good impact on the overall arrears.

 

There are two figures on the above sheets one is near the apr and it mentions accural 5843.6224 what is that?

 

And the other is additional interest mentioned in the small print in of the statements which on 8th April 2011 was £889.77 and has now risen to the tune of £4857.31 which equates to another £99 per month???? Now this scares me and I have never seen this before on the balance sheet.

 

Once again thank you I was truly desperate and I thought I had really messed up.

 

2me2u

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...