Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I will try again...................... Even at my age there is quite clearly a PCN envelope by the windscreen wipers on your car on some of the photos.  But as I said in the IPC letter, that is not the dispute. The dispute is that CPM sent you the second PCN on the 28 th day of the issue date of the first PCN. It should not have been sent until the day AFTER the original PCN was issued. Therefore they broke the Act, they breached the IPC Code of Conduct and their agreement with the DVLA. It is something that the IPC cannot ignore since to do so will bring the ICO down on them and the DVLA should ban CPM from getting data from them once they know if the ICO do nothing. The minimum I expect is that your PCN will be cancelled. But it is up to you. I have given you the details, you have copies of both PCNs sent to you on the sar  with all  the relevant dates. 
    • Apply for an HM Armed Forces Veteran Card   An HM Armed Forces Veteran Card is a way to prove that you served in the UK armed forces. The card can make it quicker and easier to apply for support as a veteran. It’s free to apply. You can currently only apply for a Veteran Card if you have a UK address. Veterans who do not have a UK address will be able to apply later this year. READ MORE HERE: Apply for an HM Armed Forces Veteran Card - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Apply for an armed forces veteran card to prove that you served in the UK armed forces.
    • The Private Parking Code of Parking has been postponed as the poor dears are frightened that thew will all go out of business once it becomes Law. We all wish but nothing could be further from the truth so doubtless most of them will have to change their ways if they don't want to be removed as approved parking companies. Thank you for still retaining and producing the original PCN which, no surprise, fails to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. [It even states the vehicle "breeched" the terms  when it was the driver that allegedly breached the terms}. It fails to specify the Parking Period and whilst it does show the arrival and departure ANPR times on the photographs [that I cannot read] they do not include how long you actually parked nor was it specified on the Notice  [photos don't count]. So that means that you spent even less time parked though it would help had you not blocked out the dates and times, so good if you could please include them on your next  post. Pofa  asks the driver to pay the charge S( [2][b] which your PCN doesn't though they do ask the keeper to pay.and they have missed out theses words in parentheses S9[2][f] ii)  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; All of those errors mean that the cannot transfer the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now responsible . What a rubbish Claim Form -doesn't even give the date of the event which it should.  
    • it doesn't matter what you are being charged or if you missed the discount period. you ain't paying anyway..... if this ever gets before a judge. then the ins and out of POFA2012 or any IPC/BPA guidelines might come into play. until then i go get on with your life. you are spending far too much time on a speculative invoice scan scheme  its almost as if you believe these are fines and enforceable in a criminal court and you could have bailiffs at your door any minute.    
    • Debt Respite Scheme (Breathing Space) guidance - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) but dont get scammed into a DMP. simply tell whomever you call to simply apply for the BS for you.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Breach of contract? / Debt dispute


Robb.S
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3613 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

First time signing up but have been lingering for some time, although I do have a problem some may help with regarding a divorce contract.

 

Now, this should be a fairly straightforward divorce as all the paperwork was needed was ready for them

and no dispute from the other half - straight forward divorce.

 

However, as time went on, he realised that some of the work done was duplicated and charging for work that had already been provided to them.

 

I believe in one instance they charged him for work outside the contract which they shouldn't have done.

 

Now once he realised he requested to put the file on hold and send out everything to do with his file so he could review and all the charges.

 

After looking at his file its clear that there are charges for work that isn't on file, duplication of work therefore duplication of charges etc.

 

He then decided to query where all the charges had come from but they have appeared to side step the questions and answer completely differently.

 

He also made a formal complaint to which their complaints policy allowed a 14 day response, in fact took the almost 4 weeks to respond!

 

Nevertheless he has refused to pay anything further until they can provide evidence of the work and also the additional charges and reasons.

 

they have decided to stop the work and pass it onto the debt recovery team.

 

This has been ongoing for over 2 years now and numerous letters have been sent and as of late are now being ignored.

 

He has complained to the Legal Ombudsman but as he was out of time they were not much help

but did hint that if he took it further he was likely to be successful.

 

This is an issue of costs, and he would now like to now recover the cost of the money he has paid so far

due to their ignorance of letters and failure to respond to any of his reasonable questions regarding the charges.

 

Obviously in any event settle the disputed amount and carry on with the contract.

 

It seems like the firm have ballsed this one up and from the start as appears the original file handler is not longer working there after questions were raised!

 

can he do anything about it?

 

I have never come across a case where someone with a debt to a firm/company to take them to court in order to either

settle the disputed debt

or void the contract and return the parties back as they were before the contract was entered into.

 

Obviously mediation may be an option?

 

Could he argue a breach of contract for failing to fulfil it the contract?

 

On the flipside they can argue the contract is not fulfilled due to him owing them money.

 

He does not want to leave it as they have already been paid almost £1,000 and not done very much.

 

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Edited by honeybee13
Firm nam removed.
Link to post
Share on other sites

The contract cannot be 'voided' and he won't be able to get any money back, unfortunately. The basic position is that the solicitor is entitled to be paid for work properly done (but probably not for things which are duplicated).

 

Does he have a detailed breakdown of charges? If yes, I would be tempted to go through that in detail, removing items which are not justifiable and offering to pay the rest. I think it would be a good idea to list the specific time entries which he says are not justified and explain why for each unjustified time entry in his letter.

 

1,000 will not cover that much legal work. You can't accept a solicitor to just accept random paperwork handed to them if that paperwork is deficient in some way. It sounds like he has received bad service, but as he has missed both the deadline for complaining to the legal ombudsman and the deadline for having the bill assessed by a court, he may need to compromise.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...