Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The coffee giant is suffering as customers "lose it" over price hikes and other controversies.View the full article
    • Victims as far afield as Singapore, Peru and the United Arab Emirates fell prey to their online scams.View the full article
    • Rights groups warn of state paranoia as experts on hypersonics, the science behind ultrafast missiles, have been jailed.View the full article
    • The Contract itself The airport is actually owned by the Ontario Teachers Pension Plan. There should be an authority from them for Bristol airport group  to sign on their behalf. Without it the contract is invalid. The contract has so many  clauses redacted that it is questionable as to its fairness with regard to the Defendants ability to receive a fair trial. In the case of WH Holding Ltd, West Ham United Football Club Ltd -v- E20 Stadium LLP [2018],  In reaching its decision, the Court gave a clear warning to parties involved in litigation: ‘given the difficulties and suspicions to which extensive redaction inevitably gives rise, parties who decide to adopt such an appropriate in disclosure must take enhanced care to ensure that such redactions are accurately made, and must be prepared to suffer costs consequences if they are not’. The contract is also invalid as the signatories are required to have their signatures co-signed by independent witnesses. There is obviously a question of the date of the signatures not being signed until 16 days after the start of the contract. There is a question too about the photographs. They are supposed to be contemporaneous not taken several months before when the signage may have been different or have moved or damaged since then. The Defendant respectfully asks the Court therefore to treat the contract as invalid or void. With no contract there can be no breach. Indeed even were the contract regarded as valid there would be no breach It is hard to understand why this case was brought to Court as there appears to be no reasonable cause to apply to the DVLA.............
    • Danny - point taken about the blue paragraphs.  Including them doesn't harm your case in any way.  It makes no odds.  It's just that over the years we've had judges often remarking on how concise & clear Caggers' WSs have been compared to the Encyclopaedia Britannica-length rubbish that the PPCs send, so I always have a slight preference to cut out anything necessary. Don't send off the WS straight away .. you have plenty of time ... and let's just say that LFI is the Contract King so give him a couple of days to look through it with a fine-tooth comb.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

£5 debt ruins my mortgae applications


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3671 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

t is ridiculous the amount of power Banks and Credit Agencies have over our lives. We have a joint account with Halifax and not used since 2010. I wrote a cheque that took me £4.71 over. I could not find my HSBC chequebook at the time. Now applying for mortgage I am shocked that for £4.71 reported by the Halifax as unpaid is stopping me getting anywhere near a mortgage application. Since it is a joint account it is the same for my wife. It has taken me a week to get documents together so that my account can be updated at the HSBC to prove I have cleared the £4.71. So as yet the HSBC underwriters will not move until my local branch updates the fact I have paid off the Halifax.

Now before all you smug people out there who have OCD in sorting out every penny in their accounts and pockets advise me that I deserve my predicament for £4.71 in debt...get a F***** Life !!!

I say the banks especially the ones where us tax payers had to write off £billions ( Halifax HBOS ) just get real and stop reporting such small sums that ruin our chances of getting a mortgage. There should be a minimum total amount that should be reported to these credit scoring agencies. also big banks like HSBC should have the information that they can see how small the debt is and stop acting like the bitch out of Little Britain who says 2 computer says No ". I mean where is the risk where someone has forgotten about an old account with £4.71 in debt!!! Stop then acting like Shylock and Scrooge. Where do we get the chance to report the old accounts our Granny opened for us in 1960 which lies somewhere with money still in it....It makes me want to start a riot !!!:mad2:

Edited by hotcurrie
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

Now before all you smug people out there who have OCD in sorting out every penny in their accounts and pockets advise me that I deserve my predicament for £4.71 in debt...get a F***** Life !!!

 

I don't think anyone here has that opinion.

 

 

Now applying for mortgage I am shocked that for £4.71 reported by the Halifax as unpaid is stopping me getting anywhere near a mortgage application. Since it is a joint account it is the same for my wife. It has taken me a week to get documents together so that my account can be updated at the HSBC to prove I have cleared the £4.71. So as yet the HSBC underwriters will not move until my local branch updates the fact I have paid off the Halifax.

 

I say the banks especially the ones where us tax payers had to write off £billions ( Halifax HBOS ) just get real and stop reporting such small sums that ruin our chances of getting a mortgage. There should be a minimum total amount that should be reported to these credit scoring agencies. also big banks like HSBC should have the information that they can see how small the debt is and stop acting like the bitch out of Little Britain who says 2 computer says No ". I mean where is the risk where someone has forgotten about an old account with £4.71 in debt!!! Stop then acting like Shylock and Scrooge. Where do we get the chance to report the old accounts our Granny opened for us in 1960 which lies somewhere with money still in it....It makes me want to start a riot !!!:mad2:

 

Billions of pounds weren't just written off. The government lent the banks money and also bought shares in Lloyds and RBS.

 

Reporting a minimum amount does seem like a sensible idea but how much is a "small sum" and where do you draw the line?

 

 

I agree that HSBC should be able to show some leeway but at the end of the day you want their money so you'll have to jump through their hoops.

Edited by ims21
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...