Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • statute barring in Scotland is 5yrs from last payment/use date or date of default Notice + 14 days, whichever is the later. dont confuse that with the 6yrs debts show on credit files (DN's 6th bday regardless to payment or not). they'd never get a claim raised by august in 99% of cases . as long all these debts were taken out whilst resident in scotland and you have not moved since taking them out but failed to inform the original creditor before the debt sale....... then stay radio silent until sb date is reached. then if you wish send our scottish sb letter. just remember unlike E&W in scotland debts are extinguished, dead , gone , parrot. once SB'd dx  
    • Hi all, Love this site and it's no nonsense advice, have dipped in and out of the consumer forums over the years, mostly to assure myself that what I was doing was the right thing when dealing with various businesses (almost 100% success rate, thanks in part to reading and more reading here.). Anyway, the time is almost approaching where I might need to ask for some specific help and I have a couple of queries that I can't see definitively answered. Due to financial mismanagement and severe anxiety issues I stopped paying all unsecured debt in December 2018 (one slipped to the first week in Jan 2019 when the last payment was made having rechecked my bank statement from that period - all my unsecured debt direct debits were cancelled in early Jan 2019). This has left half a dozen debts;  a couple of credit cards, a bank loan, Shop Direct and some Hitachi Finance stuff having been sold on and passing the rounds through the usual suspects, Lowells, Link, PRA Group, others related to them, and then back to them again. I have somehow successfully managed to maintain radio silence and avoided anything more worrying than their begging letters.  I have blocked their phone calls and texts, bumped all emails to the spambox and had a chuckle at their desperate letters.  I've never had anybody at the door.  I have been at the same address since before I defaulted and all correspondence comes to my current home address.  I have NEVER contacted them or admitted any debt. In anticipation of them perhaps ramping up action at the last minute I've had a look at my credit report on Credit Karma (rec'd from this very place) and I see that the default dates on these range from May 2019 to November 2019. Also in preperation I've been reading, reading and reading lots here as advised. Obviously being in Scotland there are a lot fewer posts relating to these matters and it's always quite annoying when OP's do not follow up with any outcome on their cases - how rude! This has also left me a bit confused of when I am able to finally breathe easy (although cancelling all the direct debits in Jan 2019 was the biggest sigh of relief as I knew it was all going to be unmanageable and, well, default one, default all.). I've been reading that defaults should be filed 3-6 months after the missed payment but one of my larger debts was defaulted on 27th August 2019 when the last payment I made was 10th December 2018, meaning the first missed payment was 10th Jan 2019.   My query for now is - when should I infer that these debts are prescribed?  From when the payment was missed, or taking the default date plus 5 years from the credit report? The three I have with the May date are moot anyway as either way they are gone  - some letters from Lowell offering me 90% off to settle is what got me thinking these must have been near SB status, however I have one big 10k+ with a July date and another 10k+ at the end of August I am feeling a bit anxious again, even though I know there is nothing to worry about with the begging letters.  Reading the various forums I am not sure why the OC's didn't take action against me when I read time and again the surprise that other posters haven't already been taken to court for lesser amounts - I'm also surprised I've avoided any action this long as there are plenty in this forum and sub forum who are whisked off to the court by the beggers minions after only a year or so after defaulting.  There are no CCJ/decrees listed on my credit report and I have not received any such judgements against me.  I still just regularly receive the begging emails to the spambox, the blocked phone calls and the letters from the they. I'm also reading that there is no need in Scotland to send an LBC so what should I be looking out for to know that the time has come to engage with CCA requests etc? I'm afraid in a fit I threw a lot of the paperwork out but I have a box of stuff I'm going to go through which may have the original letters from the OC's. Thanks in advance for any advice.  
    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.  Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Erudio again!


zaly
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3361 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I'm reading with interest as in a similar position.

 

I'm not liable to pay as my income is way below the threshold but

 

I resent Erudio's bully boy tactics and their requests for information that was not required when I originally took out the loan.

 

I have not sent or signed anything so far and my defferment runs out at the end of May.

 

I have however sent 3 emails to the company regarding their request for a P60 (which I wont even recieve from my employer until May)

and about ensure safe reciept of documents.

They have responded once 19 days after the original email was sent. I wont communicate with them by phone.

 

As it stands they do not have my signature nor bank details and I am loathe to give them either but like most peole here I really dont want my credit file affected.

 

I was thinking that sending a CCA might be a good place to start and to hopefully get my account put into dispute. Is there a template for the CCA request anywhere?

 

I may be wrong here but if I dont actually send them anything,

and dont sign or give bank details,

other than harassing me what powers would they have.

 

They wouldnt want to take me to court due to costs, they presumably cant affect my credit

and they have not signature from me, and they cant take my money wthout bank details.

Am I missing something?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Im quickly reading in my short break at work so not having time to scan through previous posts in detail.

 

I am not required to pay back my loan to Erudio as I am well below the threshold but

 

I completely resent their bully boy tactics and them asking for information that was not required when I originally took out the loan.

 

I have not sent or signed anything so far and my defferment runs out at the end of May.

 

I have however sent 3 emails to the company regarding their request for a P60 (which I wont even recieve from my employer until May)

and about ensure safe reciept of documents. They have responded once 19 days after the original email was sent.

 

I wont communicate with them by phone.

 

As it stands they do not have my signature nor bank details and I am loathe to give them either but like most peole here I really dont want my credit file affected.

 

I was thinking that sending a CCA might be a good place to start and to hopefully get my account put into dispute.

 

Is there a template for the CCA Request anywhere?

 

I may be wrong here but if I dont actually send them anything,

and dont sign or give bank details,

other than harassing me what powers would they have.

 

They wouldnt want to take me to court due to costs,

they presumably cant affect my credit and they have not signature from me,

and they cant take my money wthout bank details.

 

Am I missing something?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just my opinions - I'm no expert!

 

P60 - tell them to shove it, they only have the right to assess income over the relevant month, not a yearly average, so why need a p60?

 

Send a CCA, one for each loan - I'm led to believe that they dont actually have the credit agreements at this time and have to get them from the SLC, it'll hold things up, and might just eventually result in statute barred. Ironically by typing CCA request you linked to the template your after.

 

If you ignore you'll go into default (assuming they have responded properly to your CCA request), your loan wont be written off at 50, you wont be able to defer in future. They might take you to court, they will be within their rights. They are now the owners of the debt so DO have some rights, they can affect your credit rating.

 

If your below the cut off then why not defer? Look at the credit agreements and determine what you really need to do to defer, do that and stick to it. They'll whine but they legally cant refuse deferral just because you don't do what they ask.

 

OT: Might be an idea to start a thread with a definitive description of whats legally required to defer with Erudio? The opinions on this website are far more clear cut and less prone to intimidation than on other sites. I would certainly value the input.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Rosskie.

 

I'm just filling out the CCA now to send off today.

 

I still have some concerns about them putting my loan into default as they haven't received my deferment in time.

 

have however got evidence of the 3 emails I've sent and the 1 response that took 19 days

to arrive which would have delayed things anyway.

 

I'm guessing that putting in the CCA request will definitely delay things beyond my current deferment period.

 

Would sending the CCA automatically put the account into dispute

and give me some leeway in terms of timescale?

 

I'm just getting nervous about this nasty company using anything they can to demand payment in full.

 

Ive got really good credit and I don't them to ruin to for me.

 

I'm tempted on one hand to just fill in what they ask for to get them off my back

but as I don't have a P60 I'm sure they'll just be endless letters chasing it anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Zaly, they cannot enter anything on your credit record as you have not signed any of their forms......... If they did..... they would be in trouble and you will be able to have it removed legally.

 

The email evidence is good and backs up your story. :)

 

Sending a CCA is more commonly known as a 'Prove it' letter, ie: you do not beleive you have any contract with them and as Rosskie has found they have failed to reply in the 12+2 working days which will automatically put account into dispute. However, by just sending CCA in you do not need to reply to their deferment deadline.

 

Oh! one other thing, do not sign anything to these people, get a partner, family member to sign for you as you can stand before a judge and say there is no signature of yours with eurido and your friend - partner - sister - brother can state it is their signature.

 

Again i will say, do not fear their bully boy tactics as when you start to fight back you will find they are just idle threats. As for your P60, tell them to go to hell and you will only provide the details as you provided for SLC for last 10-20 years and nothing more. I really do feel that someone needs to really challenge them on moving goal posts as regards deferral questions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Zaly, they cannot enter anything on your credit record as you have not signed any of their forms......... If they did..... they would be in trouble and you will be able to have it removed legally.

 

The email evidence is good and backs up your story. :)

 

Sending a CCA is more commonly known as a 'Prove it' letter, ie: you do not beleive you have any contract with them and as Rosskie has found they have failed to reply in the 12+2 working days which will automatically put account into dispute. However, by just sending CCA in you do not need to reply to their deferment deadline.

 

Oh! one other thing, do not sign anything to these people, get a partner, family member to sign for you as you can stand before a judge and say there is no signature of yours with eurido and your friend - partner - sister - brother can state it is their signature.

 

Again i will say, do not fear their bully boy tactics as when you start to fight back you will find they are just idle threats. As for your P60, tell them to go to hell and you will only provide the details as you provided for SLC for last 10-20 years and nothing more. I really do feel that someone needs to really challenge them on moving goal posts as regards deferral questions.

 

Thank you for the reassurance re the deferment deadline!

 

I do find it all incredibly stressful - I'm a bit of a worrier unfortunately,

but I'm just not going to let this company bully me.

I really do hope something gets done about this.

 

It seems absolutely crazy to me that this has been allowed to happen.

They have clearly changed the T & C's and their take over is to the detriment of borrowers

but they seem to just be getting away with it.

 

I've only got 8 years till the debt is wiped and was hoping to ride that out fairly peacefully - oh well.

 

Erudio certainly don't seem to be coping very well, miserable staff, unanswered emails, 2 month delays

- we'll have to see how it all plays out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I echo your sentiments entirely Zaly, and am worried about missed deferment, but legally they are in the wrong if they dont comply with your request.

 

As for deferring, they have rolled over on a lot of their demands. You don't need a DD in place, they don't need a P60, and if you are legally entitled to defer they cannot refuse it, although they may try. Just be firm. If they ever send you credit agreements you can study and T's and C's to see exactly what is required and write to them with the evidence you need.

 

I'm sure there will be a template letter posted somewhere at some point with all the key points and bases covered, you dont need to use their forms either, despite what they say.

 

Warren - I understand about them being in default of the CCA, and account in dispute - could you comment on this though - http://www.oft.gov.uk/about-the-oft/legal-powers/legal/cca/unenforceable-credit-agreements#.U2Ps-1dWiVp - why does it say they 'can send a default notice'? I assume its in a similar irk to "can ask debtors to pay what they owe", in that is a pointless activity with no real action. I.e. a letter saying "your in default", but with no real substance or legal implications to it?

 

Figured it was a question you would be interested in too Zaly!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rosskie, my understanding and this was from the legal advice i received from AndyO in my thread is that as they are not the Original Creditor they will have difficulty dishing out any of those penalties.

 

I understand that when they bought the debts from SLC that they do in theory become the Original Creditor but, they need your signature to acknowledge this transfer in one form or another hence why the advice is to not sign anything.

 

I do find it a grey area myself and hope that dx or AndyO or one of the other very knowledgeable CAG members will explain better? .....but i beleive it boils down to you signing one of Eruido's forms (Deferment form) that grants them authority, as they are not the OC .

 

That is my understanding and im happy to be corrected if i am incorrect.

 

...One other thing, a NOSA or NOSIN (Notice of Sums In Arrears) letter is and i quote dx here ...

' a letter they will send you every six months if they THINK/BELEIVE that you are in Arrears.'

 

I recently received one from Link and dx told me to do nothing, as nothing will appear on CRA ........so it appears to be another hollow threat from dca's and an attempt to intimidate you into paying.

 

dx stated to me ...'If debt once showed on your CRA file and has gone through a previous default or it never showed, then it cannot suddenly appear. SLC debts rarely show on CRA's as they are Gov debts.'

 

So. as you have already concluded there is not anything legal to worry about and good material for lighting your living room fire come winter time. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rosskie , ignore first half of post above as i know you understand ... must have been having a few glasses of wine and went off in a tangent.

 

The NOSA or NOSIN bit answers your question i hope? They are nothing to worry about as you have already realised. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Zaly - this should interest you.

 

Cheers Warren, i really appreicate your input - some conflicting opinions on other forums about the status of a misssed CCA request have got me thinking.

 

Its been stated that account wont legally be in dispute, and that defaults can be issued. Also is seems missing a CCA deadline has no real implications if they then supply the paperwork at a future date. So I'm left wondering what I can achieve by not deferring, potential default notes (t's and c's say they can) and arrears. I can defer, so I dont see an upside to not doing it. The CCA request will undoubtedly eventually be complied with, so why stick to that one vain hope of 5/6 years passing.

 

Think I'm gonna play ball and apply to defer, but without their forms. I just cant see the upside of not trying to defer.

 

cheers guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there might be worth in investigating...........

 

what they are actually saying.

 

as far as I am aware

only the original creditor can issue a 'default Notice' - a DN as described in the Consumer Credit Act.

 

though...it could be that they are referring to a 'default' - as in 'default marker' regarding a debts monthly status

which as far as I am aware they 'can' place on a cra file - even if they are not the OC.

 

BIG DIFF BETWEEN a MARKER and a DEFAULT NOTICE.

 

I've never known a debt to magically appear

or be allowed to appear on a CRA file when it never has or has already fallen off

just because a debt buyer issues a 'default marker'

 

the issue regarding them not having a CCA

brings in my mind

the whole deferment form requirement into question.

 

it could be seem by you to ack the debt by sending one in [as it always does]

 

if they cant find the CCA , I question they cannot demand a deferment form.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Rosskie, and everyone else, I am very interested!

Busy bh weekend here so not been around.

 

I sent off my CCA request on Friday, not expecting a response within deadline.

 

It would seem to me at least that there should be some legal way of them 'proving'

that the own the debt (hence CCA) else anyone could get hold of debt details and write requesting payment.

 

The CCA as I understand it gives some legal backing to their claim for money.

It also makes sense to me that they need a signature of acknowledgement to do anything.

 

I'm trying to reassure myself that if I do end up in a court situation

I can argue that I've done everything I can and everything that is reasonable to resolve the issue.

 

I'm keeping a file of every single thing I can in relation to Erudio.

If they don't respond in time to the CCA request I plan on writing again

to acknowledge this and outlining my concerns.

 

I don't have any legal training but I suspect (hope) that a court would acknowledge

all the steps taken and see that it was not debt avoidance on my part.

 

I don't think Erudio will be doing much more than harassing though

as if they do start legal action surely they will have a lot of explains to do?

 

Changing T & C's, not responding to communications, not providing legal documents etc etc.

 

Just my musing and I may be wrong but logically it makes sense to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

No response to my CCA request as yet.

 

Interestingly though I have had a reply to my email stating that P60's are no longer required.

 

Anyone know if they have relented on any of their other stipulations? I would personally have much less of a problem handing in their paperwork if I didnt have to provide bank details so would be interested to know if they've backtracked on that one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Zaly , i would stand firm on the bank details and state that you are fully prepared to setup a SO from your side if you are obliged to start making payments. This will clearly demonstrate that you are not attempting to dodge the debt and the fact that SO's are more favourable to DD's these days. It is a 'Reasonable' request and i would state if they reject it? that you do not trust them with your bank details however, if they provide their bank details and you both agree a monthly payment amount then you will happily arrange a SO from your end. Stick to your guns! and you will be surprised what you will be able to negotiate with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

An update from me. Sent in the CCA request, recorded delivery (need to double check it arrived okay which I think I can do online but I'm assuming it has).

Today I received a letter from Erudio, no mention of the CCA request at all. Just stating that I have not paid and my account is now in arrears.

Thinking I will just reply, via email and letter stating that I have sent in a CCA request, copying in the letter sent and evidence of delivery and stating that I am still awaiting the paperwork regarding this.

Felt a bit wobbly when the letter arrived this morning but will stick to my guns.

 

Just checked and the signature for delivery is all there so CCA request definitely landed with them!

Edited by zaly
Link to post
Share on other sites

If the SLC were not recording any data with the Credit Reference Agencies, I am not sure how the new owners are able to.. because, unless you sign a new credit agreement with Erudio, then they should have no more rights than the original agreement afforded the Original Owner.. or have I missed something ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

You would hope so citizenB, hence why people don't want to sign their forms!

 

I have now received another letter from Erudio to state they are looking into my claims in my previous letter (i.e the CCA request).

 

However I have since then received another demand for arrears payments, quite threatening,

and telling me that if I don't pay it will affect my credit rating etc etc etc.

 

it would appear that although they have clearly received my CCA and are looking into it

this has not put my account in dispute as it should have and these nasty letters will keep on coming.

 

I emailed them after the first arrived and have the hard copy with all the evidence of what has been sent/received

which I will post recorded signed for tomorrow.

 

Any advice?

 

Finding their letters quite stressful and I'm starting to dread the postman as it's increasing my anxieties.

 

I believe I'm doing everything correctly and that the CCA request is a legal requirement

so I really shouldn't be getting this hassled surely?

 

Has anyone else had any response to their CCA yet?

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan up the letters please

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's a std letter nothing specific to erudio.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers I'd not be entering into ANY more comms with them till they produce an ENFORCEABLE CCA

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...