Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Just had this off Motormile Finance. Unsure what to do


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3644 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I understand you have decided to revoke your doorstep licence

 

In relation to your notification of your revocation of the doorstep licence regarding our intention to send an agent to your home to discuss the debt. I can confirm that we are fully aware of this and we ensure that we fully comply with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) guidance regarding debt collection and visits by agents. You are not correct in your assertion that, under FCA rules, we can only call at your home if you agree to make an appointment. The debt is not reasonably disputed or deadlocked, and we are giving you reasonable notice of the timing of the intended visit.

 

In law, a creditor is in a different position to a postman or a member of the public asking directions. When you took this loan, you impliedly agreed that the creditor could communicate with you to discuss repayment. You do not have the contractual right to revoke that agreement until the loan has been repaid.

 

Please contact us on 0800 9961103 and quote reference M to arrange a repayment plan for the outstanding balance, or to discuss a settlement. Our collections department is available between 8am and 8pm Monday to Thursday, 8am to 6pm Friday and 9am to 2pm Saturday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore it. They think the rules dobt apply to them. Theyre wholly wrong. Mmf do not follow the law or guidance.

 

If you want to tell them where to go, get a complaint to rob sands. Make sure to mark the envelope private and confidential.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply. Had to send them 2 revoke letters before they sent this. That was after all the early morning emails. Like what other people report they are idiots. But just needed clarification on the matter. They really need reporting to OFT.

Thanks :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

OFT are no more. If they wont listen, get the FCA involved. if they still wont listen, follow up your complaint with the FOS.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are dead on with that micky. Good luck and keep us informed, if anything happens. The main thing to do is get that complaint in, so you can get the FOS involved. It will take a long time to get it sorted, but you'll come out on top after it all.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

FCA guidance on visits, may be of use to you-

Debt collection visits

 

CONC 7.9.12

01/04/2014

FCA

 

A firm must ensure that a person visiting a customer on its behalf1) clearly explains to the customer the purpose and intended outcome of the proposed visit; and

 

[Note: paragraph 3.12 of DCG]

(2) gives the customer adequate notice of the date and likely time (at a reasonable time of day) of the visit.

 

[Note: paragraph 3.13g of DCG]

 

 

CONC 7.9.13

01/04/2014

FCA

 

Failure to give adequate notice prior to an initial visit to the customer may not contravene CONC 7.9.12 R if the customer is happy to speak to the person pursuing recovery of the debt at that time. However, where, at the initial visit the customer indicates a preference to use the first visit to agree a more convenient time for a future visit, the person pursuing recovery of the debt should respect the customer's wishes. It is important that the customer is given reasonable time to prepare for a visit and should not be coerced or pressurised into immediate discussions or decisions.

 

[Note: paragraph 3.13g (box) of DCG]

 

CONC 7.9.14

01/04/2014

FCA

 

A firm must ensure that all persons visiting a customer's property on its behalf act at all times in accordance with the requirements of CONC 7 and do not1) act in a threatening manner towards a customer;

(2) visit a customer at a time when they know or suspect that the customer is, or may be, particularly vulnerable;

(3) visit at an inappropriate location unless the customer has expressly consented to the visit;

(4) enter a customer's property without the customer's consent or an appropriate court order;

(5) refuse to leave a customer's property when it becomes apparent that the customer is unduly distressed or might not have the mental capacity to make an informed repayment decision or to engage in the debt recovery process;

(6) refuse to leave a customer's property when reasonably asked to do so;

(7) visit or threaten to visit a customer without the customer's prior agreement when a debt is deadlocked or reasonably queried or disputed (see CONC 7.14 (Settlements, disputed and deadlocked debt)).

 

[Note: paragraphs 3.12 and 3.13 of DCG]

 

 

CONC 7.9.15

01/04/2014

FCA

 

It would normally be inappropriate to visit a customer at the customer place of work or at a hospital where the customer is a patient.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that it will be of great use should they visit as yet only threats. Since we live in an apartment with locked doors gonna be kinda hard for them. That's if they even have the address as they have not mentioned this at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All that is needed if such a visitor appear is to tell them you will not discuss anything with them, then invite them to leave

stating that if they do not do so the police will be called.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

All that is needed if such a visitor appear is to tell them you will not discuss anything with them, then invite them to leave

stating that if they do not do so the police will be called.

 

Will do. I'm not a wall flower when it comes to telling people where to get of. Won't be intimidated by these lot. Thanks for that :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will do. I'm not a wall flower when it comes to telling people where to get of. Won't be intimidated by these lot. Thanks for that :-)

Well said Micky these people have no authority other than to spout the company "Scripted" threat!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

In law, a creditor is in a different position to a postman or a member of the public asking directions. When you took this loan, you impliedly agreed that the creditor could communicate with you to discuss repayment. You do not have the contractual right to revoke that agreement until the loan has been repaid.
This little gem has been an MMF stalwart for a while. They are correct in that FCA (previously OFT) debt collection guidance does allow a creditor to call at your house, but they fail to acknowledge that withdrawing their implied right of access completely trumps this.

 

 

A private company without a valid warrant from a court has absolutely no right to call at your home after you've told them not to, regardless of what MMF like to say. Stopping them visiting with a WOIRA is completely valid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They just nean the doorstep collectors letter. It works for dcas but not bailiffs etc.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought a WOIRA was a load of cobbledash! It cant be something to do with the FOTL right?

All this home visit rubbish can be dealt with quite simply: If one of these "doorsteppers" does visit remember that have no authority to enter properties take goods, or even require/request an individual to discuss an alleged debt.

"politely invite" the person to leave the premises immediately or be removed with police involvement if needed.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Of course you can ask them to leave but if you have sent the letter beforehand it just strengthens your hand if you need to make a complaint

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...