Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I was trying to post all the paperwork that I have, namely facebook ad, messages between the seller and my son etc . But I'm getting the message that the files are to large. 
    • First of all please can you tell us the name of the seller, something about the van – age/year, mileage, price paid. How far away is the seller from where your son lives? Who do you take it to for this inspection? Are they prepared to give you a written list of the things that they found? This is very important and you may well have to get an independent inspection from somebody such as the AA. This will cost you some kind of feedback we expect that we will be able to help you get it back. I would say that if you have to bring a court claim – which is likely – then your chances of success are better than 95% but the difficulty might be enforcing the judgement against the seller. We will have to no more in order to give you better advice. Does it have an MOT? What is the date of it and who gave it the MOT? I suggest that you start taking pictures of all of the defects that you can find.   Also I am going to say that I believe that you came over from Facebook where you were already informed that we would need at least all of the information which I have requested above. It will save a lot of time and effort for everybody if you can simply come up with the things that we ask without too much delay
    • My autistic son brought a van from a private seller. ( there was 5 other cars on his drive and another van, plus loads of machanic tools in his hallway,  so he probably is a unofficial dealer).  He gave the van a once over, he checked for any warning lights that might be on, there was none. He checked underneath for any rust etc, it all looked fine. The body was rough, but you'd expect that for the age of the van.  He got his brothers machanic to give it a pre mot check, as the van was old so he expected it to have a few problems. The van is a deathtrap, the seller had blacked out all the warning lights that were on the dash,  and I mean all.  He had also painted some kind of black stuff on the underside, to hide all the damage there.   My son drove it for over 2 hours to get it home. The machanic said he's surprised my son is still alive, and an untrained eye would not of seen what the seller had done.  Iv asked the seller for a refund and for him to have the van back, but he is refusing. Is there anything we can do.   
    • The economy grew by 0.6% in the first three months of the year, ending a shallow recession.View the full article
    • First of all it sounds as if your retailer is very decent and very responsible. This itself is unusual in these kinds of circumstances and I think we need to bear this in mind. The guarantee is not particularly relevant and in fact the dealer had a statutory duty to exercise a certain responsibility for your computer – probably for several years as their obligation under the consumer rights act. The dealer may not have known this and it simply acting out of a sense of moral responsibility and that is even more noteworthy. You've already suggested earlier that you didn't really want to cause problems for your retailer. I think that you will need the help of your retailer as well in order to get information and evidence. I suggest that you proceed against DPD – but before you do that – I suggest that you have a discussion with the retailer. Tell them that this is what you are going to be doing and you would like to have a copy of anything they have which relates to the special instructions which apparently your dealer has already informed you about in relation to where item should be left. Secondly, maybe you should tell your dealer about this site and also about this thread. I can imagine like many dealers who are frequently sending items by means of couriers, they have had things go missing. Tell them that we will be very happy to help them recover money for lost or damaged or stolen items – and that is regardless of whether or not they have purchased insurance. Apart from being very pleased to help your dealer recover items which have been lost by irresponsible parcel delivery companies, I think we need to encourage the complicity between you and them so they will be pleased to support you in your claim against DPD. It will be helpful if you can get a copy of the instructions that you have referred to above, and also if you can get some written evidence of your own instruction that your laptop should be left in a safe place. Have you done the reading on this sub- forum? You will need to do lots of reading of many of the similar stories on this sub- forum. They won't necessarily be against DPD but the principles will broadly be the same. Also read the pinned topics at the top of the sub- forum in order to understand many of the principles involved. Getting your money back but be quick – but your chances of success are better than 90% that you can bank on it taking anything up to a year. Have you got anything in writing from DPD either refusing you or telling you that they won't discuss with you?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Back bill received - advice please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3421 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My daughter moved out of her flat early last July 2013, and

 

she asked for and paid the final gas/electric bill.

 

However, she has now just received another final bill for over £450.

 

She has spoken to the company who say it is their fault and the amount is for Jan to July 2013.

 

They say she can pay via a payment plan.

 

Needless to say, she is very upset.

 

She paid by direct debit when she lived there and made sure she paid the final bill.

 

She lives on a very tight budget and manages her money accordingly.

 

Can anyone tell me where she stands here?

 

What is your advice?

 

Thanks:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

why do they say she owes this when she paid up before?

 

who is this please?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just an update that

 

apparently my daughter rang npower up when she moved out of her flat last July to ask for a final bill.

 

They didn't respond at all and no bill arrived.

 

Now they respond (letter received 12 April) apologising for not getting the final bill to her on time

and that it falls short of the service the customer deserves, etc, etc.

 

My daughter sent a letter back to them saying that she is not liable for any payments due further than 12 months away from the date

she received their letter and asked them to send an amended bill within the next 10 days or she would consider the matter closed.

 

No response yet!

 

Did we do the right thing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Still battling with this so would appreciate some advice.

 

Had a letter from npower dated 1 May,

that was obviously a standard letter,

 

saying they've taken the feedback seriously and raised a complaint on my daughter's behalf

and they are confident the matter would be resolved shortly.

 

Didn't hear anything so sent a letter dated 21 June to the person who sent the aforementioned letter

saying that other than receiving further remainders to pay the disputed amount owing, nothing else had been received.

 

We asked for a response within 10 days.

 

Now, 7 July, my daughter has received an Act Now to Avoid Court Action demand saying they will proceed with a summons

with possible additional costs of £120.

 

I would just appreciate advice as to whether to take this further,

does the back billing law apply (no final bill was received until 9 months after leaving the property),

 

should we go to the Ombudsman,

should we reply to the Customer Services Director who sent the Court Action letters?

 

Help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would write back to him

giving the complaint number.

 

so you've not received the revised bill only including the 12mts back from that first bill

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, they haven't responded at all except for the standard letter on 1 May saying they have raised a complaint on my daughter's behalf.

 

We will send another letter to the Customer Services Director, attaching all previous correspondence, and send it recorded delivery. Would you agree that the back billing law applies in my daughter's case? I believe it does.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Reply has been received from Executive Complaints and advice re next steps would be really appreciated

as I believe back billing (at least) applies. By the way, their letter dated 12 July was not received.

 

"You recently wrote to npower’s Customer Service Director Gareth Pickles in relation to your billing query

and the delay in issuing the final bill to you.

 

As a member of the Executive Complaints Team, this has been passed to me to investigate and respond on their behalf.

 

After completing a full review of the issues you have raised, please find below a detailed response to these points.

 

I am very sorry for the delays in issuing a final account to you.

I understand how frustrating it is when you do not know where your account stands.

I apologise for the confusing messages you have had from us.

 

As you moved out of Flat xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, on the 01 July 2013 and the bill was originally produced on the 1st January 2014,

your account will not fall under the criteria of final bill write off's.

 

This was not introduced until the 01 June 2014 and your account had already been billed at that point.

I understand that you did not receive the actual statement until April 2014 and for this I am sorry.

 

I understand that you may have received a letter dated the 12 July 2014 offering as a resolution to your complaint,

a goodwill gesture reduction of £145.38 on your account, leaving the balance to pay of £300.00,

I feel that the offer is fair under the circumstances. The balance can also be spread over a 12 month instalment plan.

 

If you are happy for this as a resolution to your complaint,

please can you contact me back on the details below, within the next 7 days.

 

If you have not contacted me back after this time I will apply the goodwill gesture,

set up the 12 month instalment plan and close the complaint without the need to inconvenience you further."

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Bit of an update here. This went to the Energy Ombudsman and it was eventually agreed that npower would provide a letter of apology and a payment plan. However, they have not met their deadline for doing this. As this Final Decision was binding on npower doing the above by a certain date and they have not met this date, I wonder if the £300 does not need to be paid now? How do we stand legally? Any advice would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to go back to the ombudsman and let them handle it.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...