Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Delinquent Halifax personal unsecured loan but no default.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2730 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have found some info on this question but can't really find a definitive answer.

 

My situation is this:-

 

I have a delinquent account showing on my credit file (both Equifax and Experian) from a Halifax personal unsecured loan I took out in 2007.

 

I am reasonably satisfied that this loan is now statute barred as I have had no contact with them since late 2007.

(I have not made any payments or acknowledged the debt since that time).

 

However Halifax did have never registered a default with the CRAs and the account is showing as delinquent with the last update being August 2010.

Both Experian and Equifax tell me that this will remain on my file until six years after they eventually decide to serve a default notice.

 

I know that there is some vague guidance to lenders from the ICO regarding when defaults should be registered,

but I wonder how much weight this carries.

 

I would obviously like any default backdated to a reasonable date.

 

If anyone has successfully challenged this sort of situation I would be grateful for your advice or possibly the letters used.

 

Thanks

George

 

(Please do not make moral judgments, I would not about you and my circumstances are quite unique, and very personal)

Link to post
Share on other sites

if its not defaulted or has no markers its not harming you

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply but I'm still a bit unclear. Do you mean that it will not affect future credit applications?

 

Here is the info on my equifax report:

6 late payments September 2006 to February 2007. (Incidentally this is inaccurate by a year, the first missed payment was September 2007)

 

It then shows a 'U' in a grey box representing 'not updated ' for every month upto September 2010 then nothing after that.

 

It also states:

'Default / Deliquent balance £***.**

'Start date xx/05/2007 (Again inaccurate)

'Date last deliquent' BLANK

'Default date' BLANK

'Date updated ' XX/08/2010

 

So what will this likely mean to potential future creditors? Will the six missed payments be visible to creditors? bearing in mind that they are now over six years ago.

 

Thanks again

 

George

 

(Please do not make moral judgments, I would not about you and my circumstances are quite unique, and very personal)

Link to post
Share on other sites

No one here will make any " moral judgements I assure you.

 

 

This entry on CRA files appears to have been left dormant and forgotten. I presume you are not being contacted by Halifax or any third party in regard to this?

 

 

I have a hunch this may have been sold on in a large portfolio of delinquent account that Halifax got rid about 4 years ago.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

bad markers older than 6yrs should not be showing

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No party is updated the files since 2010, fallen off a DCAs radar??

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to gather some more data on this, perhaps a SAR to Halifax would be best.

 

 

Or a letter to The Data Controller of Halifax (HBOS), along the lines of:

 

 

Sir/Madam,

 

 

I have been reviewing my credit history and have found an entry placed by Halifax on my credit reference files (attach a screen print of the entry) I have attaché a copy of this.

 

 

I notice that this account has not been updated since 2010 the account has not been defaulted and is now statute barred and no payment to it will be made now or in the future.

 

 

I do not accept any liability for any debt to Halifax.

 

 

If this account had been defaulted in line with the ICOs Guidance on Defaults it would have been removed from my credit reference files whereas it remains and is a negative factor affecting my credit profile.

 

 

I would like Halifax to remove this item from all credit reference agency files to which it has reported the account.

 

 

I would appreciate an early reply.

 

 

Send recorded/signed for post check delivery. ( avoid using an address with a PO Box Number it may not get signed for).

 

 

There is no guarantee they will comply, but if they don't a formal complaint to them and a written report to the ICO is next.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
Hi

 

What happened with this? Understand I'm 2 years late asking this!

 

I'm in an exact situation as yourself and was looking for some help. Did you manage to get this removed from your credit file?

 

Thanks

 

Hello and Welcome dannieccles135,

 

The original poster in this thread has not been back since April 2014, If you could start a new thread in this Forum you should get some help with your problem.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?205-Credit-Reference-Agencies

 

Regards,

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can update on this as it matches my past circumstances

 

I had one of those cashplus pre-paid credit card and took out their credit builder option., Seems i missed the last payment and they updated my credit report with a late payment marker for six months, i had a '6' eventually though they never defaulted. I simply paid it off when i became aware and the account was then closed.

 

Even though the account was not defaulted i was more than three payments late so the account status became 'Delinquent.'

In the eyes of future creditors and credit scores that will have a substantial negative impact until until six years has passed.

 

Now the good news.

 

Creditors will normally ignore a delinquent account status after three years has passed and you have run your other credit accounts in good order. My Cashplus account was closed in 2012 so comes off my credit file in 2018. That current delinquent status on my own credit file has not stopped me obtaining main stream credit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Delinquent Halifax personal unsecured loan but no default.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...