Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Appreciate the time that has gone into replying. I have read so much about this tonight that hopefully I can be a step ahead.  If I gain a reply from the head office I shall let you guys know. 
    • yep. they are all simply trading names of perch to try and scam people into thinking their debt is going up some kind to mystical legal chain...which is BS. all dca's pull these stunts and have done since the late 1970's
    • just type no need to hit quote. what you really need to do is forget about it now they have  just steer clear of THAT ONE STORE for a few months. other B&Q's are OK. even if you do go back in, they'll simple ask you to leave, then if you return again, could invoke trespass laws BUT WE HAVE NEVER SEEN IT HERE. as for getting out of your tree about police, prison, criminal record, arrested, knocks at doors, letter of claim....NONE OF THE CAN EVER HAPPEN. and has not on these joe public low level shoplifting incidence since 2012. you've already got a scary letter ratchetting on about some mystical FAKE civil restoration scheme .  you'll probably get a few more ...NOTHING THEY CAN EVER DO. bin shred burn give to your pet hamster any money people pay CRS/RLP/DEF etc regarding their letters goes straight into their pocket and off they go down the pub and LAUGH at people they mugged. the retailer never sees a penny.  i admire your action of send £5 to B&Q. its done now and its over with....move on with your live. dx
    • Sending money across borders, particularly in Africa, can still be expensive.View the full article
    • 4.  Under The Pre-Action Protocol 201?, a Debt Buyer must undertake all reasonable enquiries to ensure the correct address of a debtor, this can be as simple as a credit file search. The Claimant failed to carry out such basic checks. Subsequently all letters prior too and including ,The Pre action Protocol Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 and the claimform dated 14th February 2020 were all served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018. 9.   The claimant failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis on the 2nd February 2024 'The Claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents.' None were received by the court nor the defendant by that date. re: 13 & 15...they dont need to produce the deed, thats a private b2b document only the judge can demand sight of. i would remove 13 totally as within their WS they have produced the Notice Of Assignment. and delete it from 15 a few ideas. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3689 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

2 days ago i got my second letter addressed to myself and my ex girlfriend

from Rundles for unpaid council tax for a address i lived in back in 2005,

 

it was Attendance notice the clearance of goods, the amount owed is for 1,502.31.

 

I believe the reason its taken this long to get to me is because i split with the girlfriend in 2007

and then moved in with friends for a few years

then finally got my own place

and had to obviously put the council tax for my flat in my name

which must of flagged my name up.

 

I didnt know this debt exsisted until i got the first letter.

 

The problem i have is i dont know where my ex lives now days and i assume only my name has come up.

 

The bailiff has never gained entry and

i live on the third floor in a flat so they cant come through any windows etc.

I dont drive so there is no car for them to take.

 

I spoke to Rundles on the phone a few months ago

and made a payment of 30 pound

then they said ok

so your next payment will be for 247 and

 

i said i couldnt afford that much and

 

the lady said well you would have to speak to the actual bailiff and arrange a payment plan,

 

I didnt hear nothing until friday when i received this new letter.

 

Where do i stand with this?

 

Is it possible to get this debt back to the council as i don't fancy dealing with Rundles

or am i just gonna have to bite the bullet and deal with them?

 

Im gonna try and speak to the citizens advice

 

but thought id join here and see what your experts recommend

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't pay the bailiff at all

 

pay the council directly

 

you need to do the following as a matter of urgency:

 

stay off that phone to the bailiff follow this:

.

if you can pay you should be paying the council

direct via your internet banking site

never ever pay a bailiff.

.

Here is something to be getting on with.

First of all establish from the Council how much was owing etc

You need to speak to someone at the Council and ask the following questions:

.

1 - how many Liability Orders they have against you

2 - the dates they were obtained

3 - the addresses they were for

4 - the period of time each covers

5 - how much each one was for

6 - how much is still outstanding

7 - the dates they were passed on for enforcement

8 - the dates & amounts of any payments

.

.

Next you need to send off for a breakdown of the charges the Bailiff applied.

Here's an example, use and ADAPT at will and best sent initially by email

backed up by a copy in the post.

..

"From:

My Name

My Address

.

To:

Acme Bailiff Co

Bailiff House

.

Ref: Account No: 123456

.

Dear Sir

.

With reference to the above account, Can you please provide me with a breakdown of the charges.

.

This includes:

a - the time & date of any Bailiff action that incurred a Fee.

b - the reason for the fee.

c - the name(s) of the Bailiff(s) that attended on each occasion a Fee was charged.

d - the name(s) of the Court(s) the Bailiff(s) was/were certificatedicon at.

e - the date of the Certification.

.

This is not a Subject access requesticon under the Data Protection Act S7 1998 so does not incur a fee of £10. You are obliged to provide this information.

.

I require this information within 14 days.

.

Yours faithfully

.

Ripped off customer"

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh also i forgot to add

 

after the first letter i got from them

 

i sent an email to the council for the dates of the debt

which were actually correct up to the date we moved out

 

15-jun-2004 to 31-mar-2005 712.68

01-apr-2005 to 13-oct-2005 495.43

Total 1,208.11

 

So there is charges of 294 pounds

 

liability order date 16 dec 2008

 

Sorry i have no pound sign on my keyboard

Edited by Clizzle
Link to post
Share on other sites

they must have a n lo for each year

 

hey cant lump them together

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they must have a n lo for each year

 

hey cant lump them together

 

dx

 

so what do i need to do now send the above letter to the bailiffs? and a phone call to council and ask these questions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes whichever way you go that info will be needed

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so iv sent an email to council asking for all that info, do i send the email/letter to rundles now or shall i wait to hear back?

Sorrry im a bit of a newbie when it comes to this stuff :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would put the request in

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Clizzle,

 

It is important to be aware that council tax is payable by 'those in residence'. Therefore, if you had been living with your partner during the period in question then legally, both of you are jointly liable for paying the debt to the council. This is despite the fact that only your name may be on the council tax bill. This is a very common misconception.

 

As the debt is a 'joint' one, the council can seek recovery from either one of you.

 

Coming to the fees. The amount being charged is not correct. The bailiff can charge a fee of £24.50 for 'attending to levy' (where no levy was made) and a further 2nd visit may be charged at £18.00 making a total of £42.50. The only other fee that can be added would a 'levy' fee but of course this may ONLY be charged is a valid levy had been made upon goods (which in your case would be impossible given that the bailiff has not gained entry and you do not own a car).

 

Unfortunately, with council tax the current position is that from any payments made to the bailiff they are legally permitted to deduct their fees and may pay the balance to the council. Accordingly, if the amount of fees is disputed the bailiff will nonetheless deduct such fees from your payments!!!

 

I would suggest that you call the council immediately and advise them that you have serious concerns at the fees that have been charged by THEIR AGENTS and that you require confirmation from the council as to what the fees represent.

 

Do not let the council palm you off with the excuse that you have to speak with the bailiff. NOT TRUE !!!

 

As the fees that the bailiff may legally charge are at just £42.50 then as long as the baiiff company know that you are aware of this they are likely to want to return the accounts back to the council.

 

Another option for you is to pay the bailiff fees of £42.50 to the bailiff company and therefore there is nothing stopping you from making all future payments direct to the council.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys iv sent emails to both parties with all the info you suggested,I now wait for their response to see what they say, I will come back with the reply to see what i can do next

Link to post
Share on other sites

i got a reply from rundles already

 

this is the breakdown payment 1.00?

Levy fee?

 

iv never even seen the guy as all the times he has come iv not been in

 

there is no way he has levy'd my stuff

as the flat is on third floor and

we have security door as well as my front door

thats alway double locked when im not there.

 

Debt Oct 21, 2013 - £1,279.81

Visit fee 1 Oct 25, 2013 - £24.50

Payment by D/C Oct 28, 2013 - £1.00

Visit fee 2 Nov 4, 2013 - £18.00

Levy fee - Feb 28, 2014 - £60.00

Attendance / Van -Feb 28, 2014 - £150.00

 

Total £1,502.31

Link to post
Share on other sites

This forum is extremely popular and bailiff companies frequently view posts (that is why it is important to make sure that no personal information is posted that can identify a debtor).

 

An immediate response needs to be sent back to Rundles and I hope that nobody minds but I will draft a template for Clizzle and provide her with a copy by PM.

 

Clizzle, once you receive a response from Rundles would you be sure to update the thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PM sent.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

right ok i got a reply back from the council and this is what it said, im still waiting on a reply back from rundles

 

 

1 - how many Liability Orders they I have against me. - 1 Liability Order.

2 - the dates they were obtained - 16/12/2008

3 - the addresses they were for - ################

4 - the period of time each covers - 15/06/2004 to 03/10/2005

5 - how much each one was for - £1,279.81

6 - how much is still outstanding - £1,264.31

7 - the dates they were passed on for enforcement - 25/03/2009 sent to Pheonix Bailiffs

24/01/2012 sent to Bristow and Sutor Bailiffs

12/09/2012 sent to Rossendales Bailiffs

18/10/2013 sent to Rundles Bailiffs

 

8 - the dates & amounts of any payments - £15.50 paid from Rundles Bailiffs to us on 08/11/2013

Link to post
Share on other sites

unsure on this....

 

can the council 'lump' 2yrs of unpaid ctax together under ONE LO?

 

I thought they would need to have an LO for EACH year?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

unsure on this....

 

can the council 'lump' 2yrs of unpaid ctax together under ONE LO?

 

I thought they would need to have an LO for EACH year?

 

dx

 

as far as im aware its only 1 year the 2 you see there is the original of £1,279.81 then the second is the same debt minus the 15.50 which rundles bought it for

Link to post
Share on other sites

The important response that you need is the one from Rundles regarding the 'levy'. Once you get this can you update us.

 

Given that the council have already passed this debt to 3 previous companies I would suggest that you make an 'affordable' payment arrangement with the council.

 

Also, the local authority are wholly responsible for the levy and fees charged by their agents. I would suggest that you ask the council what goods have their agents levied upon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as far as im aware its only 1 year the 2 you see there is the original of £1,279.81 then the second is the same debt minus the 15.50 which rundles bought it for

 

CTAX debts are not sold

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok got home from work to find a card left in my letterbox saying:

 

I have called today to seize your goods for sale at public auction.

 

Whilst the law entitles me to remove goods in your absence,

I would prefer to do so when you are present

 

Please call me ..........

..... to arrange an appointment for me to return and remove goods or collect the debt in full

 

If i do not hear from you,

 

I will have no alternative but to return without notice

and seize goods whether you are present or not.

 

I still haven't had a reply from my email so do i just hold on until i get a reply?

 

Thanks again

Edited by Clizzle
too big
Link to post
Share on other sites

as he has no levy

 

that's a load of...

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

i still haven't heard anything back from Rundles via email or letter,

 

I have however got the council to add the account to my online account where i pay my council tax now,

 

It has the option to make payments for it.

 

Should i start paying them 50 pound a month or carry on waiting to hear back from the bailiffs and see where that goes?

 

If so what do i do about the so called money owing to them?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes start paying the council

 

sooner the better.

 

you really need to write a formal letter now to the bailiff company repeating your request for a list of charges./ dates/reason

 

theres is also the outstanding action on post 20 to resolve

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...