Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3513 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guy / gals,

 

Was going to ask a Question about RLP but have done my research on here and seem to have received my answer. However, I will post for everyone's research.

 

My step Daughter foolishly got caught shop lifting in Tesco's, she was skint and did not ask her mother for money. She has 4 kids, blah blah blah.

 

She has paid her £80 fixed penalty to the Criminal Law system.

 

So RLP and Tesco can charge for a security guards time, but the Police do not charge the step Daughter for their time and effort? Laughable really.....

 

I am posting her letter and will keep the group informed of any further correspondence after sending "JACKIE" a one liner....

 

Cheers CAG.

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]49157[/ATTACH]

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you read the other posts about RLP on here, it certainly does open your mind to what a set of con artists they are.

 

Have Tesco's sent RLP a Bill of £191.50 in my scenario?

 

Will Tesco get any commission of the £191.50?

 

Will every little help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tesco will be completely unaware of any action which RLP are taking in their name - there is almost certainly only an 'understanding'

 

If RLP are successful in fleecing somebody then Tesco will get a kickback, but the lion's share will remain with RLP

 

Makes you wonder how RLP can claim that the payment demanded is for the supermarket's 'costs' in dealing with an incident and in providing security resources when they don't actually receive most of the money that is paid? Yet another reason why an RLP demand can never be a genuine pre-estimate of loss n'est pas?

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Guys / Gals

 

Thought I would update my little predicament with Rlp. Step daughter has ignored letters from RLP, but it appears she opened the brown envelope that Scotcall sent their begging letter in. I attach a copy for reference.

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]49834[/ATTACH]

 

Is it still the same advice and ignore Scotcall?

 

I have tried to console Step-daughter, but she is getting a bit stressed with the words court and legal action

 

Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send a letter to Scotcall:

 

Dear Sirs

 

I refer to your letter dated xxxxx.

 

Any debt or liability to your client, or any company they claim to represent, is denied.

 

No further correspondence will be entered into.

 

Yours etc.

 

This usually does the trick, because Scotcall know (or should know) that RLP's speculative invoices are not substantive debts. Once you have denied liability you are clearly disputing the matter. The OFT rules require them to cease collection activity in these circumstances. You may get a couple more of RLP's begging letters, but you are near the end now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys and Gals,

 

Think the penny has finally dropped with me in regards to how these people operate. If I sign a credit agreement for a loan / car finance the creditor, by law can take you to court and file for return off money owed and last resort Baliffs?

 

As I have not signed any agreement with RLP / SNOTCALL how can they ask for any monies. Is this the same thing as me sending a letter to RLP, with an invoice asking for £45 administrative services?

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys / Gals,

 

would just like to add my layman terms on how I see this situation. How many people around this country receive these letters pay UP and do not have the power of CAG?

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys and Gals,

 

Think the penny has finally dropped with me in regards to how these people operate. If I sign a credit agreement for a loan / car finance the creditor, by law can take you to court and file for return off money owed and last resort Baliffs?

 

As I have not signed any agreement with RLP / SNOTCALL how can they ask for any monies. Is this the same thing as me sending a letter to RLP, with an invoice asking for £45 administrative services?

 

Regards

 

 

 

That's it, more or less. RLP's business model is called speculative invoicing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Guys and Gals,

 

Just a quick update on my case, RLP have started texting the Step-daughter as discussed on this site....

 

Thanks CAG, we are well informed and armed with your expert information.

 

Kind regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could send them a unilateral contract that state unless they produce "strict proof" of a debt that is the result of a contract between yourself and any party they represent then they agree that they are corresponding with you for the purposes of your acting as a marketing consultant and that they agree to pay you the sum of £80 per letter you are sent and the same sum for any reply you send as a result.

This will be more enforceable than their supposed debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys / Gals,

 

Having a few problems with signing off with Virgin at Mo, they seem to think that are family signing an engineers upgrade sheet,equates to signing a new contract. Is this correct?

 

kIND REGARDS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys / Gals,

 

Having a few problems with signing off with Virgin at Mo, they seem to think that are family signing an engineers upgrade sheet,equates to signing a new contract. Is this correct?

 

kIND REGARDS

 

Best to start a new thread for your Virgin problems....can't see that this is relevant to your RLP issue?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If scotcall are involved then youre almost at the end of jackies harassment campaign. Either ignore them completely or simply tell them that there is no debt and you will be forming a full complaint to the regulators.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Guys / Gals,

 

Just an update to this particular problem with RLP, and basically there is nothing to report.....

 

""THEY HAVE BUGGERED OFF""

 

So, for anyone reading who has problems with RLP, take advice from this group, "THEY GUD MAN"

 

Thanks Again....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Not "disappeared", just found another victim to harass - Although I fear they may be on to a mighty good hiding if they continue to pursue Madamfluff. :razz:

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...