Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Link adding interest to 2 GE old sold loan debts


roaringgirl
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2211 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

then sadly the quote in post 86 from link is correct

 

 

and as long as their calcs are correct too they've done nowt wrong

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

or await the SAR and get that PPI reclaim running on both loans

or is this only one so far they are after?

 

 

you could also try and reconstruct the loan

and see if they are correct?

 

 

try:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have got the PPI claim running.

 

I think I will SAR GE Money.

 

Can you explain to me what you mean by reconstructing the loan?

 

It's ok... I can see now

 

How do I change the interest rates?

 

That spreadsheet says I owe considerably less than what they say I do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They did. But are they going to tell the truth? Not.a.chance with these two inept companies

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

prob penalty chares added and the interest on them.

i'd await the statements via the sar for a true figure

you can pull apart!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just as a side note 12.6% of anything you actually paid went on PPI

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well they haven't in 2 yrs so why now

and as per post 47 that loan agreement has errors

that prob make the whole agreement invalid

unless its a mix up between load 1 & loan 2

 

 

they are after one only

and they sent loan 2 paperwork??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

re #108

up to you.

did they specifically say that they 'will' commence litigation. the 14 days is up by a week from that letter you mentioned! no claim.

as a last ish resort, you cld take it to the FoS, let them decide what interest they can charge. if they say its all legit, then so be it.

can also include a ppi complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, Link now want Kearns to proceed with a CCJ.

 

I have rung them and told them to freeze the account while I do a SAR.

 

They agreed to hold for 7 days.

 

Their other option is pay it back in 5 monthly instalments.

 

I STILL maintain I don't owe them all that.

 

 

How can I still owe the more than I was actually given credit for?!!!

 

 

After 9 years?????

Link to post
Share on other sites

PLEASE STOP RINGING FLEECING DCA'S..

 

 

they have no legal powers at all.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no they are acting as a dca mouth piece

kearns are the next bloke at the next desk

in a diff coloured skirt

 

 

they might 'want' or 'threaten'

if might instructed could

but not WILL.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're falling for their tricks. They can see that very obviously aand have you marked as gullible

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

try the otherway around...

 

there no rhyme or reason why they cannot

doesn't matter what you do sadly

 

if a fleecing DCA thinks they can mug you

even if the paperwork.balance.PPI.etc etc are naff

or negate the debt, they will.

 

PPI time and then off to the FOS

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have rung them and told them to freeze the account while I do a SARlink3.gif.

 

They agreed to hold for 7 days.

you wont get sar info back within 7 days. but, do the sar anyway if its material.

 

as mentioned, that last letter where they threatened court didnt materialise in a claim after their given 14 days (they have pretty much confirmed that, as when you phoned there was no claim). because they didnt say in the letter 'will'.

have had lots of template letters saying 'may' send it to sols in x days. from about a year ago. no claim. ok, it all depends on individual circs, and sometimes they may not follow the required letter before claim. but, given that they didnt do a claim after their last 'may' might give an idea.

up to you, just a thought :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I spoke to the solicitors, they told me that Link had instructed them to proceed with taking me to court.

have you had a letter before claim?

if you're worried about, put a formal complaint in. re the interest. and the ppi, and anything else. to go to the fos if not resolved. that should put things on hold for a bit longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

'instructed'

does not mean will.

 

 

and it was on the phone too.

 

 

same word they use in the letters.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hi, long time since I last posted on this thread.

 

2 debts to GE Money.

 

One paid back.

 

The other, the last payment was in December 2013.

 

Just received a letter asking me to contact them regarding the money owing on the account.

 

I have had no contact Re this debt since 2014.

 

It is enforceable.

 

If I hold out till December this year, can I make it statute barred?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then dont contact them...file

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not going to. The last time this happened they got their solicitors on to me and threatened to take me to court.

 

I am buggered if after all this time I should pay up. Especially when all I am doing is paying the interest after the debt had been sold.

 

The debt is 12 years old for Christ’s sake!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...