Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Items for sale include five rare Ferraris and a pair of Air Jordan sneakers signed by Michael Jordan.View the full article
    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3648 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Been on the phone to HCE again today.

 

The court issued the form explaining that I needed to make payment to DHL on the 10/9/13,

 

DHL Instructed HCE on the 27/9/13

 

Thats 13 working days from the court issuing and DHL instructing, not minusing any days lost in post etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Still not got anything resolved with this as of yet, HCE are not interested and just want payment and I simply cannot afford to pay them the amount they are asking for. I will be submitting income and expenditure and trying to get a payment plan down whilst I try and get this thing resolved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I submitted the income and expenditure and a offer of £10 a week, they declined the offer and sent out a officer to let me know. The officer told me that they had not accepted the offer and he was here to take the car. I raised the offer to £25 a week. They have just emailed me back now to say they will accept £25 a week although the balance needs paying off in six weeks time and they have added a £50 setup fee to the costs.

 

I cannot believe that these people are able to pull these kind of stunts in this day and age.

 

I owed DHL money, I admitted I owed them the money as soon as they removed the incorrect charges. I paid DHL off in full yet these morons keep hounding me and making it as difficult as possible to settle the £1000 fees they have charged me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nath123

 

I have read this post several times and it would seem to me it all hinges on dates..............there appears to be a period of 17 days from the date the judgment was made and the writ obtained, however you do not mention the date the debt was settled direct with the creditor.

 

If the debt was paid before the writ was 'active' then you do not owe anymore than the amount given in Judgment to the creditor. If you did not make any payment until after the writ was in place and a visit to serve the writ took place then you could be liable for some small 'costs' However, looking at the breakdown you have received I cannot see how most of their costs can be justified and personally I would be challenging them.

 

There is at least one HCEO who I know that are very professional when executing their writs and given the circumstances you outline, they would in all likely hood see your having paid the creditor direct without fuss satisfactory and call the debt settled then make charge to the creditor of £60 to abort the writ.

 

I would be looking to stay the writ pending detailed assessment of the fees (this is the correct way to challenge the 'costs)

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Looks like my original reply never posted.

 

As far as I was aware I had sent the payment and it was processing. I then received a visit where the officer posted by hand the writ. The same day the writ was issued I then realised that the payment was not being processed, another cheque was sent recorded delivery and soon after the amount in full left owing was paid. Weeks after I received another writ but for the fees of the HCEO officer.

 

Thanks

Nathan

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the debt was not paid 'forthwith' as ordered, then DHL have done nothing wrong in transferring their ccj up to a Writ of fi'fa and instructing HCE to enforce.

 

What is still unclear is,......... were DHL paid with cleared funds before the date the writ commenced? If not HCE have acted as the writ commands (instructed) and attended enforce ie; seize goods or collect payment, they are entitled to charge for doing that.

 

If you have good reason to believe the fees that have been charged do not comply with regulations, you will need to challenge them in the correct manner. Google and read carefully .........Practice Direction 47 of the Civil Procedure Rules for Detailed Assessment of Costs. and take action accordingly

If you are finding the current agreement of £25pw is not affordable to you and HCE are refusing to lower the payment, you could apply for a Stay of Execution along with a Variation Order to get the agreement on a formal footing.........be warned...as from 6th April the costs for making the aforementioned applications will increase substantially.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

£1746.30 Judgement debt

£111.75 Cost of execution

£4.59 Accrued interest

£1862.64 Total due to Claimant.

 

Our Fees incurred in this matter broken down as follows:

£58.88 Poundage

£2.40 Seizure Fee

£4.80 Enquiry Fee

£60.00 Mileage

£97.00 Valuation

£120.00 Enforcement Costs

£250.00 Administration

£160.00 Financial Management Fee

£50.00 Arrangement Fee

£30.00 HPI

£833.08 Total in Costs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Being really blunt here....the new regulations that took effect on 6th April at least make these awful charges (as outlined above) a thing of the past.

 

That's not necessarily the case as this would have progressed to Enforcement Stage 2 now and the fees would be circa £899.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...