Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
    • Good morning all, No further communication with P2G so now submitting my small claims action. Would be grateful for any feedback on my description of claim before I submit later. The defendant in this case is Parcel2Go Limited The claimant sent a parcel using Parcel2Go Ltd as a broker and Evri as the shipper containing two handmade bespoke wedding trays to a customer with tracking number P2Gxxxxxxxx. The parcel was never delivered although the defendant stated that three attempts had been made to deliver the parcel.  The claimants customer waited in for four days to receive the delivery but no delivery was attempted. There was no communication with the claimants customer.  Despite many web chats and emails the parcel was not delivered and on the Parcel2Go website it stated that the customer had refused delivery. This was not true as no delivery had been attempted.  I was informed that the parcel was being returned to me but after waiting three weeks was informed by Evri that the parcel was lost. I was offered compensation of £20 + shipping fee which I refused and after sending Parcel2Go a Letter of claim this was increased to £75 which I also refused. It is clear that the defendant is responsible for the loss of the parcel as they did not act with reasonable care and skill when handling the claimants parcel, contrary to section 49 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015. The claimant therefore seeks £370 in respect to the value of goods plus court costs. I thought it might be better to use the CRA rather than the Supply of Goods and Services Act as we are sole traders - is this correct?
    • No new development, I'm afraid. The last update I received was a letter from the court, advising that the case had been transferred to Croydon County Court.
    • Read how your orgnisation can make opportunities and employment more accessible for disadvantaged young people.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tenancy notice period confusion


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3849 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

would end the tenancy around the 4th however when this was submitted to the agents they said the tenancy will not cease until around the 28th.

 

I have not got her tenancy agreement yet, but I have a copy of another agreement from the same agents and it has absolutely no mention of how much notice is required on vacation of the property.

 

Are they right to demand that she keeps paying for over 2 weeks rent which is outside of the months notice she given them and when they will be in possession of the keys?

 

The difference is £200-300 I don't have the exact dates with me unfortunately so having to guess a little, but there isn't likely to be much different

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without T dates, length of fixed term etc it is impossible to advise.

If T served NTQ during fixed term, she cannot vacate T til last day of fixed term. She can move out earlier, subject to 'empty property' requirements but will remain resp for rent and property until end of fixed term.

If valid NTQ was served after fixed term ended (now SPT), expiry dates must relate to T periods, which require min 1 month to almost 2 months. Again She can move out earlier, subject to 'empty property' requirements but will remain resp for rent and property until end of fixed term.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The tenancy was a 6 months ASH tenancy which is around 4 year old.

 

If this is a requirement on leaving the property why doesnt it form part of the tenancy agreement, very few tenant will be aware of this, surely the whole point of a tenancy agreement is to provide all the relevant rules and regs and requirements one of which would include what to do on termination. Any legal contract should have all the terms enclosed.

 

she was also being bugged to let them in to take photos and was told the property had to be clean (fair enough) and in a position to be photographed, she is moving out she has boxes piled up everywhere, being a wheelchair user it is a hard task to get everything packed up in the packing process theres now not much room anywhere.

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

So we assume T is now Statutory Periodic whose conditions are set by Staute (written) Law not unwritten Common Law.

The fixed term Notice conditions are often inaccurately detailed in AST. It would be near impossible to detail all nuanances of Statute in AST

The basics are included in previous post.

Without precise T start dates, I can only assume LA is correct with their date of ~28th.

Too many Ts think they only have to give 1 months Notice at any point in T. Incorrect. Ignorance of Law is no defence, esp with Internet

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignorance is no excuse?

 

How dare you be so rude, if I am honest I find this remark very ignorant.

 

A tenancy agreement is a legal contract, is it not, so how can there be legal terms that they don't bother to put in, agents are supposed to be professionals who know their field and relevant statutes and should make sure their clients are fully aware of ALL requirements that form part of the contract. But if they did that then they wouldn't be able to cash in when the tenants only find out after its too late. I am not disagreeing to statutes, what I am disagreeing to it the consumer not being informed of their requirements.

 

This is a very important key point of the tenancy agreement, it is not something which is trivial, if tenants are required to give notice on a set date THEY SHOULD BE MADE AWARE OF IT, had this happened then the notice would have been given and the move date altered to suit, thereby not wasting almost £300.

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

What you say is very valid Icy, but the agents have only 2 loyalties..

 

Themselves

The Landlord

 

You as the tenant have no legal ties with the agent at all, everything they do is on behalf of the Landlord.

I am not a solicitor :!::!:

 

Most of my knowledge came from this site :-D:-D

 

If I have been helpful in any way at all .............. Please click my star..... :-(:-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...