Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot


Hayley1210
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3838 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please help :-(

I've been advised by some good people on here over last year regarding some debts, I am in payment arrangements with all however regarding a black horse loan from 2007 I was paying a dca called ascent with interest frozen by black horse. However out the blue last month I received a letter from Cabot saying I had not met the agreed payment and to contact them. There was reference to a black horse loan in their letter. I write on 5th nov stating I did not acknowledge any debt and to provide evidence, since thus I'm inundated with letters and phone calls. I sent letter recorded, which has been received their end. I really don't know what to do ice heard Cabot can file for ccj'a quite quickly :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been making payments to ascent for nearly a year now, I owe blackhorse about 4700 and have been paying 25 a month. I've not heard off bh or ascent and continue with my standing order. I absolutely won't speak to Cabot. Upon receipt of their first letter I wrote off with the standard I do not acknowledge this debt, and asked for evidence etc, but since it's I've received numerous letters, with no regard to my request. Is there a time limit before I should write back, I'm really concerned I've heard Cabot go for ccj's and enforce sales of houses (not that I have any equity in mine. How can they just expect me to start paying them something they've provided no proof of? I don't understand the system :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have dealt with Cabot on a few occasions with help and advice from the good people on this site. As said previously don't panic. Cabot can be beaten. Check your credit file to see who actually owns the debt. Then ask for proof of the debt from Cabot. Send a CCA request to Cabot ( I would do this by recorded delivery ). They have 12 + 2working days in which to reply, if they don't they are in default of your request. Lets see what comes back from them then we can take it from there. It is highly unlikely Cabot will rush to court without for a ccj without documentation which is what you are asking for in your CCA request.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It could be that the transfer of the debt to Cabot has not yet been registered on your file. Maybe good idea to check other credit reference file , ie. Experian, Noddle, Call Credit and the like. Some offer a 30 day free trial but be sure to cancel before the end of the trial date. Noddle are free all the time but not necessarily up to date. Re your F&F from Cabot, does this offer show any amount of discount, if so it may indicate that they have no valid paper work relating to the account. Sent a CCA request to Cabot to help clarify the [position then you will know for sure. They have 12 + 2 working days to reply after receipt of the request. Send request recorded delivery so you have proof it has been received.

See what comes back then let this site know and further help will be available. I certainly would not take any action, especially at this stage in respect of the F&F. Lets wait and see what Cabot have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's showing as settled because Blackhorse have sold it and, as Boltmaker says, Cabot probably haven't registered it yet.

 

Boltmaker is right in saying that the amount of discount may indicate the likelihood of their having the paperwork, so the best thing to do is to see what the CCA request turns up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I couldn't agree more. Get that CCA sent off , if you are not sure how to do it here is a link

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?387435-CCA-Request-Consumer-Credit-Act-1974

 

Just a reminder do not sign it and if you pay by cheque ask someone else to write one for you and give them the quid.

 

Any offer of F&F should be treated with caution, remember that Cabot may have only paid 10% for the debt so if they can quickly offer you a 50% reduction they are still quids in on a very short time scale. Think about it, a return on their investment of 500% , puts PDLs to shame. It does not automatically mean there is a problem.

 

Also if you have been making payments as agreed they can not alter those payments.

 

Did you get a notice of assignment i.e a letter telling you that they had bought the debt?

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, thanks for your replies, I didn't receive any notice but cabot sent a copy when I sent the I do not acknowledge this debt letter to them. I clarified with blackhorse by phone that they had sold the debt. Cabot have offered 30% discount which I couldn't afford even if I wanted to. I curreny owe 3800. I am in the process of SAR to blackhorse to see what charges etc I might be able to claim back I know there's a lot, and I'll CCA cabot. I'll keep posted and thank you so much for the help and advice :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

A 30% discount is generally good news for you as it tends to indicate that Cabot may not have the correct or sufficient paperwork for the debt they have purchased. I would continue as you are and get all the info you can from BH and Cabot. See and analyse what comes back then let this site know and further help and guidance will be forthcoming.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...