Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

LOVEFILM "FREE" trial


Gemric
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4694 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have just recently signed up with LOVEFILM for a supposedly free trial, 2 days after registering I have had £15 taken from my bank by them. On registering it stated that there was nothing to pay for 21 days or until I had rented a certain amount of films.

 

I am very annoyed and wondered whether there is a cooling off period after signing up as I want to cancel this and get my money back.

 

Any advice would gratefully appreciated.

 

Gem

LLOYDS TSB

4th August 06 - Data Protection Act S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

19th September 06 - Prelim sent

2nd October 06 - Standard Lloyds reply

9th October 06 - LBA sent

20th October 06 - Standard Lloyds reply

**N1 to be submitted 27th October 06**

Link to post
Share on other sites

I reckon it must be a mistake. I had 3 months free with them, then started paying once that ran out. Have you contacted them to ask why they've taken money?

Abbey - 547.00 settled in full.

Second claim: £204 WON.

Barclaycard - 142.88 incl interest due WON BY DEFAULT as they didn't even bother entering a defence. Barclaycard paid up £184.88.

 

MBNA - Concluded £634.31

Capital One Concluded £148

Kinda disappointed I've no more banks to go after now...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cooling period or no, you are obviously entitled to your money back, as it is a "free" trial. Have you asked them? It does sound as if it is just a clerical error, and they will probably refund you no questions. Could be wrong of course!

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No - they all work this way. The amount taken is used to verify you are who you say your and the card is valid. If you decide not to proceed the fee is refunded when they get all their discs back. It's not what you expect for a free offer, but as they will refund or give full benefit of the time period, they can make this claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

God! Is that right? I obviously don't check my bank statements closely enough as I didn't notice money coming out of my account!

Abbey - 547.00 settled in full.

Second claim: £204 WON.

Barclaycard - 142.88 incl interest due WON BY DEFAULT as they didn't even bother entering a defence. Barclaycard paid up £184.88.

 

MBNA - Concluded £634.31

Capital One Concluded £148

Kinda disappointed I've no more banks to go after now...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just checked their site.. it says:

 

6.4 Upon registering for your free trial, your method of payment will be authorised for up to three months of service - to verify your identity, and to protect us from theft and fraud. Some banks or payment card companies may reflect this authorisation against your available balance or credit limit. No actual charges, however, will be made against the card if you cancel prior to the end of your free trial.

 

Not clear!

Abbey - 547.00 settled in full.

Second claim: £204 WON.

Barclaycard - 142.88 incl interest due WON BY DEFAULT as they didn't even bother entering a defence. Barclaycard paid up £184.88.

 

MBNA - Concluded £634.31

Capital One Concluded £148

Kinda disappointed I've no more banks to go after now...

Link to post
Share on other sites

That term does basically say the same as okonski just said...

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have tried several times to contact them today, no reply to email. Manged to get hold of their phone number (which is no where to be seen on their website) only to be told their computers are down and to try again in an hour.

LLOYDS TSB

4th August 06 - Data Protection Act S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

19th September 06 - Prelim sent

2nd October 06 - Standard Lloyds reply

9th October 06 - LBA sent

20th October 06 - Standard Lloyds reply

**N1 to be submitted 27th October 06**

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well - you're still no better/worse off than before. If you've no intention of staying after the free trial, the fee will be refunded after the discs are returned. You might just be wasting time and effort to the same effect!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have finally got to speak with someone at LOVEFILM who completely denied taking any money, having already spoken to my bank today I knew different. Eventually, to my dismay, she admitted they had in fact frozen the money in my account, I then asked her what bl**dy right she had to do that !! To which she replied "we havent actually taken the money only frozen it" Whats the difference she has stopped me from accessing my money, to me there is no difference!! When I asked her when it will be unblocked she replied at the end of the "FREE" trial. ( I dont think so !!!) After a few words in her ear she agreed that it would be unblocked today.... However this instruction would take two days to reach my account... at which point a gave up and agreed that would be satisfactory.

 

Does it really take the bank two days or was she just fobbing me off?

LLOYDS TSB

4th August 06 - Data Protection Act S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

19th September 06 - Prelim sent

2nd October 06 - Standard Lloyds reply

9th October 06 - LBA sent

20th October 06 - Standard Lloyds reply

**N1 to be submitted 27th October 06**

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is called a 'shadow' charge (or pre-auth - pre-authorisation), and has been pointed out previously, is ued to verify that the card is valid anf there will be funds available to take on the due date. The finds do not leave your account, BUT your spending power is reduced by that amount. It is a common commercial practice, also used by car hire firms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It stinks !!

 

I only signed up for this because it was advertised as a free trial, if they had said £15 sign up charge I would not have done.

 

It probably would not have wound me up so much had they not taken (frozen) the last £15 in my account leaving me with nothing until Friday.

 

What if I had not had the money in my account would they have taken it anyway making me overdrawn and facing bank charges.

 

I do understand what has been pointed out from their terms & conditions, but it is a bit sketchy and surely it must be against some kind of trade descriptions law when the are describing it as free.

LLOYDS TSB

4th August 06 - Data Protection Act S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

19th September 06 - Prelim sent

2nd October 06 - Standard Lloyds reply

9th October 06 - LBA sent

20th October 06 - Standard Lloyds reply

**N1 to be submitted 27th October 06**

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, i don't think you understand, i shall just say this once, they have removed/blocked MY RIGHT to access MY MONEY without MY AUTHORISATION/CONSENT with no communication whatsoever.

 

I think you will find as they have blocked my money in which i have no access to, is called theft!

LLOYDS TSB

4th August 06 - Data Protection Act S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

19th September 06 - Prelim sent

2nd October 06 - Standard Lloyds reply

9th October 06 - LBA sent

20th October 06 - Standard Lloyds reply

**N1 to be submitted 27th October 06**

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have removed/blocked MY RIGHT to access MY MONEY without MY AUTHORISATION/CONSENT with no communication whatsoever.

 

Actually they did have your consent, it is written in the terms and conditions of the offer which you agreed to during the signing up process. Presumably you didn't read them prior to accepting them.

 

I think you will find as they have blocked my money in which i have no access to, is called theft!

Perhaps you should go and look up the definition of theft.

Lloyds TSB, Total Charges £900, Claim Filed for £1379 - Settled

 

Sainsbury's Bank Credit Card, Total Charges £90 - Settled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just checked their site.. it says:

 

6.4 Upon registering for your free trial, your method of payment will be authorised for up to three months of service - to verify your identity, and to protect us from theft and fraud. Some banks or payment card companies may reflect this authorisation against your available balance or credit limit. No actual charges, however, will be made against the card if you cancel prior to the end of your free trial.

 

Not clear!

LLOYDS TSB

4th August 06 - Data Protection Act S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

19th September 06 - Prelim sent

2nd October 06 - Standard Lloyds reply

9th October 06 - LBA sent

20th October 06 - Standard Lloyds reply

**N1 to be submitted 27th October 06**

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perfectly clear, and to say you are overreacting is an understatment. It is a common practice, and understandable as well. At no point have they TAKEN money from you. By the same token, if your bank systems go down and you were unable to withdraw money for 2 days, would you say the BANK has stolen your money??? I think not.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you'll find that it is the consensus that understands the situation, you - sadly - do not. They advertised a free service, and that's precisely what you get. If you don't believe us, complain to the ASA (Advertising Standards Authority) and the result will probably be the same. They state up front what they're going to do - if you didn't like it, why did you join? Or did you not read the terms and conditions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, points taken on board.

LLOYDS TSB

4th August 06 - Data Protection Act S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

19th September 06 - Prelim sent

2nd October 06 - Standard Lloyds reply

9th October 06 - LBA sent

20th October 06 - Standard Lloyds reply

**N1 to be submitted 27th October 06**

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

I was recently signed up to a 2 month free trial with LoveFilm, but a sales rep at a shopping centre. When I chacked my bank account £3.99 had been taken. I have contacted lovefilm many times, and in all of their replies they have never mentioned the fact, or answered my questions about why money was taken.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They often take a 'test' amount to prove that the card is valid. It is only a 'shadow' charge, in that it reduced your purchasing power, but is then removed after 7 days or so. What you need to watch out for, is when cancelling with Love Film, you MUSAT have all the discs back before the cut off date, if not you get billed for the following month, even if you said you cancelled the service.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

it's a con - the salesman will tell you it's a free trial (which is a genuine offer) but actually sign you up for an instant deal, they do this as it earns them more commission. loads of people at college have been done by the same lads in town. you should be able to cancel easily online.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...