Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I did, however now I dont want it. Its been six months of stress  
    • For the moment do nothing, never appeal, wait for a letter before action, ignore all the tripe they send you other than that.
    • as another of farages faragit reformatory boys shows his true colours Ian Gribbin, the party's candidate in Bexhill and Battle claimed * ' the country would be "far better" if it had "taken Hitler up on his offer of neutrality" instead of fighting the Nazis in World War Two. err tell that to the russians - who did .. * said people should  “exorcise the cult of Churchill and recognize that in both policy and military strategy, he was abysmal”. * Praised Russian president Vladimir Putin as he: "understands the bonds that create more stable societies; the hypocrisy of the West is preposterous as we stare in the face daily the enormous economic equalities created by our deluded neo liberal ideas" and "if only the West had politicians of his class".   * 'women were the "sponging gender" and should be "deprived of health care". * "Men pay 80% of tax – women spend 80% of tax revenue. On aggregate as a group you only take from society. Less complaining please from the 'sponging gender'." - Wonder what his momma thinks of that?   On being caught out, cribbin initially refused to comment before belatedly and weakly 'apologising' A Reform spokesman said the comments were “written with an eye to inconvenient perspectives and truths”. Chairman Tice said “We’re really pleased with all candidates." Leader Farage seemed to think the greens vetting OUT and suspending 20 unsuitable candidates was a 'bigger problem' than reform not only leaving **** the unsuitable in, but also being apologists for them     Reform candidate says UK should have ‘taken Hitler’s neutrality offer’ WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK He also praised Russian president Vladimir Putin and described Winston Churchill as ‘abysmal’   Reform UK candidate apologises over Hitler neutrality comments WWW.BBC.CO.UK Ian Gribbin says his grandparents were "Russian Jews fleeing persecution" and his comments were taken out of context.  
    • do you ultimately want to keep the car?
    • Thank you!    It was bought on my debit card    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tribunal Schedule of Loss advice needed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3894 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, this is the first time I have posted on here so please be gentle with me!

 

My partner is going to tribunal against RM and has a date set for early next year. He had a case management discussion 2 weeks ago and has been ordered to do a schedule of loss by 22nd October. We have drafted one (below) and just wanted someone to cast an eye over it and see if its correct? He is claiming for unfair dismissal and sex discrimination on the grounds of Section 47c Employment Act (treated detrimentally on grounds of paternity).

 

 

The bits we are uncertain about are -

  • Do we need to claim for statutory payment for unfair dismissal and sex discrimination, or just sex discrimination?
  • Do we claim interest on compensatory award only for both unfair dismissal and sex discrimination, or the whole thing?
  • Any other advice?!?!? would be gratefully received!

UNFAIR DISMISSAL

 

 

 

BASIC AWARD

 

 

 

EffectiveDate of Termination (EDT) X

 

 

 

Ageat EDT X

 

 

 

Numberof years service at EDT 5

 

 

 

Statutoryweek’s pay £372.10

 

 

 

5weeks x £372.10 £1’860.50

 

 

 

COMPENSATORYAWARD

 

 

 

PAST LOSSES

 

 

 

Netpay: £322.35 per week

 

 

 

Amountof time Mr. X had no income, between statutory paternity pay period(X), to proposed career break start date (X): 5 weeks.

 

 

 

5x £322.35 £1’611.75

 

 

 

 

 

FUTURE LOSSES

 

 

 

Noclaim for future losses submitted, as Mr. X is not available for workuntil X and it is reasonable to expect that he may have gainedemployment during this period, even when taking his reference into account.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LOSS OFSTATUTORY RIGHTS

 

 

 

Mr.X will have to work two years to regain protection from unfairdismissal and it is submitted it would be appropriate to award £500 to reflecthis loss of statutory rights.

 

 

 

 

£500

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL COMPENSATORY AWARD £2’111.75

 

 

 

Upliftfor failure to follow the Acas code

 

 

 

TheClaimant argues that an increase of 25% should be made to the compensatoryaward for the Respondent's failure to follow the Acas Code of Practice. TheRespondent did not deal with the Claimants Grievance about the allegedprocedural errors which occurred during the Respondents investigation into theallegation against the Claimant.

 

 

 

Total increase £527.94

 

 

 

TOTALCOMPENSATORY AWARD £2639.69

 

 

 

 

 

SEXDISCRIMINATION

 

 

 

BASIC AWARD

 

 

 

EffectiveDate of Termination (EDT) X

 

 

 

Ageat EDT X

 

 

 

Numberof years service at EDT 5

 

 

 

Statutoryweek’s pay £372.10

 

 

 

5weeks x £372.10 £1’860.50

 

 

 

 

 

COMPENSATORYAWARD

 

 

 

PAST LOSSES

 

 

 

Netpay: £322.35 per week

 

 

 

Amountof time X had no income, between statutory paternity pay period(end date X), to proposed career break start date (X): 5 weeks.

 

 

 

5x £322.35 £1’611.75

 

 

 

 

 

FUTURE LOSSES

 

 

 

Noclaim for future losses submitted, as X is not available for workuntil X, and it is reasonable to expect that he may have gainedemployment during this period, even when taking his reference into account.

 

 

 

 

 

INJURY TOFEELINGS

 

 

 

Theclaimant alleges that a discriminatory act of a less serious nature, which ledto the termination of his employment, took place. Although the alleged act wasnot of a serious nature, it had a large impact on X, causing him toX.

 

 

 

£6’000

 

 

 

 

TOTALCOMPENSATORY AWARD £7’611.75

 

 

 

 

 

Upliftfor failure to follow the Acas code

 

 

 

TheClaimant argues that an increase of 25% should be made to the compensatoryaward for the Respondent's failure to follow the Acas Code of Practice. TheRespondent did not deal with the Claimants Grievance about the allegedprocedural errors which occurred during the Respondents investigation into theallegation against the Claimant.

 

 

 

TOTALINCREASE £1’902.94

 

 

 

TOTALCOMPENSATORY AWARD INCLUDING INCREASE £9’514.69

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

The basic award only applies to unfair dismissal, not sex discrimination, so it may need a slight re jig! Interest can be claimed on discrimination awards. To that end, you need to quantify the discrimination claim in injury to feelings only -you should be claiming injury to feelings under the Vento guidelines so make sure the amount claimed is appropriate.

 

Statutory rights is usually claimed at £350 rather than £500. And you appear to be saying that no future losses are payable, but I'm not sure why? An explanation isn't needed - just figures and how they are calculated (eg 52 weeks x weekly pay). Don't forget the schedule of loss is the best case scenario so it's usually somewhat inflated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Becky, thank you so much! There is no future loss as my partner was meant to be on an unpaid career break from September for 1 year. We would expect that he can find a job from September 2014, so cant really claim any future loss of earnings.

 

I'll adjust statutory payment to £350. Ill remove all statutory award from Sex Discrimination. And I'll calculate interest on sex discrimination. Ive put it in vento lower band as it was single act of discrimination which led to dismissal, rather than series of events.

 

When stating how much compensation we want for injury to feelings, do we need to say why that amount? Could you please give an example?

 

Thanks again :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've explained it very well in your last post, ie - an award at the highest end of the lowest bracket for a one off (serious) act of discrimination. Usually you would put how the discrimination made the claimant feel - anxious, frustrated, humiliated, etc as well.

 

Are there any residual claims to include for a failure to provide a contract of employment, or written reasons for dismissal etc?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please disregard: I note it is already covered.

 

--------------

Don't forget to claim for "Loss of Employment Rights!. It is about £300 (look it up). This covers the fact your partner has to start from scratch in new employment for the qualifying period to claim breach of ERA (EqA is exempt fron employment qualifying periods).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...