Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You haven't returned to the thread to give us your views, but a couple of other things strike me which you should consider: 1. You say that at no time was your father's licence revoked by the DVLA. It didn't have to be revoked. It expired in September and his "entitlement to drive" (of which the licence provides proof) expired along with it. He could only continue driving whilst his application was being processed by virtue of s88, and it seems clear to me (based on what you have said) that he was not able to take advantage of the benefits provided by that section. 2. The letter he received threatening to revoke his licence was probably a template letter sent when any medical issues are brought to the attention of the DVLA. But it is clear that beyond September until it was eventually renewed, your father had no valid licence to be revoked. I believe a "not guilty" plea in court will fail. The basic facts are that your father's licence expired in September, it was not renewed until February because the DVLA were looking into his medical declaration and he could not take advantage of s88. So in December he had no licence and no entitlement to drive under s88. The facts that he believed he was fit to drive and that his licence was eventually renewed may mitigate the offence but they do not provide a defence. I also asked whether he had received a summons (very unusual these days) or whether he had received a "Single Justice Procedure Notice". The way to proceed from here differs slightly depending on what he has received so if you let me know, I'll advise further.  
    • Well, what I've read from various sources suggest if a CCJ is 6 years old that if becomes pretty much ineffective for enforcement purposes in its original form.  And that if it's about to expire then the claimant needs to apply to the court to extend the original CCJ within the final year.  Even if they do apply for an extension within the 6 years they have to have a very strong argument for doing so such as the person being out of the country or could not be traced, basically show they were actively still perusing the debt I guess. Now if a claimant ever does apply within the 6 years to extend the CCJ, would the person named on if be notified by the court that such an application has been made?.  In my case I've heard nothing from the court so assume no such application has been made.  The original CCJ in my own case is now a year beyond the 6 years of issue so must now make things even less likely again. So whilst the CCJ exists that they have not enforced it in that time must surely make it unlikely they can now take it back to court because as said it would be very rare for a judge to agree to such action now. That said, I guess they now can't use the CCJ to continue with any action for an attachment order to our mortgage either?
    • Donald Trump now banned from countries including Canada and UK as convicted felon WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK There are 37 countries that bar felons from entering, even to visit.  
    • Well, they trashed their last election manifesto pledges, so nothing new really is it? They just find weasel words to try to claim they haven't actually failed if you just look at it just a little squinted and in this particular way  - and are stupid.
    • I think they're inventing stuff now. They seem to know they won't be around to implement any of it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Begining My Claim!


jscouser2002
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6569 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In a nutshell - they will not even bother to read the letter - they will just see 'refund of charges' and pass it along to the next person.

 

The removed paragraph - you have made your calculation, and given a total, you don't need to tell them anything else. As for the reason they applied the charges, well, why tell them something they already know.

 

At the end of the day you need to be resolved to them ripping you off, and then you claiming your money back. The why to's and wherefore's are a complete wast of your time.

 

However, once you HAVE got your money back, you are free to vent your spleen to all and sundry. For example, the next time you see 'charges pending' on your account, you will be in the position that they have already refunded you, so you can give them a good kicking the second time around.

 

Better to do the work first, and then enjoy the game later :rolleyes:

 

Thanks for your advice and editing my letter. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

S'okay - good luck with the claim. My guess is that they will ignore this, and you will have to raise a claim in court.

 

A week later you will get a letter from their solicitor, giving all the guff about 'charges are fair' 'we would win' 'managagement time' 'unrecoverable costs.' This will be followed by a sentence offering the full amount, and subject to confidentiality.

 

All you need to do is cross out and initial the sentence about confidentiality, sign and send back. Two days later the money should be in your account...:)

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

S'okay - good luck with the claim. My guess is that they will ignore this, and you will have to raise a claim in court.

 

A week later you will get a letter from their solicitor, giving all the guff about 'charges are fair' 'we would win' 'managagement time' 'unrecoverable costs.' This will be followed by a sentence offering the full amount, and subject to confidentiality.

 

All you need to do is cross out and initial the sentence about confidentiality, sign and send back. Two days later the money should be in your account...:)

 

Sounds great. But either way im prepared to go to court as i think i would win. Unless they can justify there costs which i think will be impossible.

 

Anyway what address should i send this too. I took the pre lim letter to the branch they then gave me a receipt and forwarded it to the correct department. I was thinking about sending it to the financial obumsman or whatever.

 

Whats the best address?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds great. But either way im prepared to go to court as i think i would win. Unless they can justify there costs which i think will be impossible.

 

Anyway what address should i send this too. I took the pre lim letter to the branch they then gave me a receipt and forwarded it to the correct department. I was thinking about sending it to the financial obumsman or whatever.

 

Whats the best address?

Any one know the method they sent there LBA to the address? because im sending today. Not sure wether to take it to branch again or not.

 

I wanted to take to branch so i can get a reciept so that they cannot say they havent recieved it. But im not sure wether to post it directly to

 

The Financial Ombudsman Service

South Quay Plaza

183 Marsh Wall

London

E14 9SR

 

Or take it to branch with original address that i gave in for the pre lim letter and get a receipt

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not much further along than you with HSBC but with both HSBC and A&L I took the letters to the branch and got someone to sign for them, I was happier knowing that I'd left them in someones hands rather than in a pile of post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

19th May 2006

 

Sort Code:

Account Number:

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

I recently sent you a letter requesting a full refund of all charges that have been unlawfully applied to my account. It has now been 14 days, and I have not received any notification of when you will be refunding my charges.

 

I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law. The charges that you applied to my account are unlawful under common, statute and contract law.

I am frankly shocked that you have operated my account in this way, as I had always reposed confidence in your integrity and expertise as my fiduciary.

 

To clarify my request: I calculate that you have unlawfully taken £583 from my account between 24th April 2004 and 27th April 2006. Since this date an additional charge of £36 was levied from my account on the 8th May 2006. This has led me to revise my claim in the sum of £619.

 

I require repayment in full of £619 for the charges that been unlawfully levied from my account. Additionally a further charge of £50 is due to be unlawfully taken from my account on 7th June 2006. If this charge is levied from my account before my claim is resolved then I will revise my claim to recover this additional charge. If you do not comply fully within 14 days then I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount plus interest, plus my costs and without further notice.

 

Furthermore, I shall submit a Consumer Credit Act 1974 complaint to the OFT upon the basis that you have failed to comply with the OFT's direction of 5 April 2006 and are therefore not a 'fit and proper person' to hold a consumer credit licence under the 1974 Act. If you do not understand what this means then seek advice from your legal department.

 

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

Hand deliverying this letter tomorrow into my branch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Took the LBA letter to branch was a different guy than the last one. Previously the women just looked shocked and gave me a reciept. This time i walked over to the guy at a desk in like a reception area and asked him to forward this to the correct department and give me a receipt. He looked confused asked me to take a seat, unwillingly i did. He read the entire letter to himself. I thought if he starts asking questions im just not willing to talk.

 

He said to me "Why do you say they are unlawful"

 

I replied "To be quite honest id prefer any of my communication in writing"

 

He just said ok and asked me to wait few minutes. Came back and give me a receipt for the letter.

 

He looked worried!

 

I await there reply. To be honest i fully expect to be logging on to moneyclaim site soon. From what ive read on here

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

14 Days was up today I was ready to go to moneyclaim site tomorrow first thing. Until i got home from work to this letter

 

 

Dear *********

 

Thank you for your letter dated 19th may 2006 requesting a refund of all your bank charges of £619.00 going back to 24th april 2004.

 

In circumstances were you have authorised a payment that would, if met by us, lead to your account going overdrawn or over an agree overdraft limit, we have to consider wether to make this payment. A free is payable for this service provided by the bank, details of which are clearly set out in our published price list. The circumstances in which the fee will apply are clearly set out in our personal banking terms and conditions which you were provided with a copy of when you opene your account. If you claim for a refun proceee to Court, we therefore believe we woul successfully resist any legal challenge in realtion to these fees.

 

HSBC is, however mindful of the management time an irrecoverable legal costs that it may incur in relation to such a claim. For those commercial reasons alone, an without any admission of liability whatsoever, HSBC is perpared to make a payment to you in the sum of £525.00 representing the charges applied in full and final settlement of this matter.

 

If you accept this proposal please sign and return the enclosed copy of this letter to us within 10 working days and we will arrange for a refund to be made to you. If we do not receive your signed acceptance within this timescale, we will take it that you have declined our offer.

 

I trust that this matter has now been addressed to your satisfaction. If you are not satisfied with the banks response you have the right to refer your complaint to the Financial ombudsman service. Further details about the ombudsman scheme are set out in the enclosed leaflet and you have six months from the date of this letter, within which to refer your complain to them should you decide to do so.

 

Thank you again for taking the time to write.

 

Yours Sincerely

 

 

 

Phil Beaumont

Senior Service Quality Officer.

 

 

I accept the sum of £525.00 in full and final settlement of this matter against the bank.

 

Signed ....

Date ...

 

 

Ok please excuse any spelling errors because i have just typed it up myself. Now what do you all think i would do.

 

In my lba letter it clearly states also that an addition £50 is due to come out of my account on the 8th june and if this matteris not settled in full by that date i will be changing my claim to the sum of £669. So at the moment the claim is for £619 but in two days it will be for £669.00

 

Now i dont really want to accept the £525 because i feel the sum is actually£669 pound or at least it will be in two days when the addition £50 comes out. Also i feel that if i accept the £525 I dont feel like im in as powerful a position as to future charges as i would be if i recieved full settlement.

 

So should i sign the letter and give in or should I write them another letter saying that i do accept this as partial settlement and will continue to pursue for the addional £144.00.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So should i sign the letter and give in or should I write them another letter saying that i do accept this as partial settlement and will continue to pursue for the addional £144.00.

 

It's your money and only you can decide what offer to accept. Personally, I wouldn't accept anything other than a full refund - there time is up so if you want to go for the full amount then start the claim.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would accept that sum however. I dont want it to effect my position if i recieve any other charges.

 

What i might do is accept the £525.00 as a full refund regarding the original £619.00. Take the signed letter the branch tomorrow then when

the other £50 comes out on thursday send a pre lim letter for that on friday and do the same for any other charges. Or i might consider speaking the branch manager tomorrow regarding the charges

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would accept that sum.

 

You have to decide what's best for you - if that is the amount you want to accept then fantastic you've won!!

 

When you accept the offer just make it clear to them that it is full and final settlement for this claim only.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So should i sign the letter and give in or should I write them another letter saying that i do accept this as partial settlement and will continue to pursue for the addional £144.00.
If it were me I would call them. Their 14 days is up, and you were due to file a claim tomorrow...

 

I would say thanks for the offer, but it is not good enough. The bank has had plenty of time to meet my request in FULL, and unless they agree to a FULL and unconditional refund, you will raise your claim as intended.

 

However, it is YOUR claim, and only you know what is best. That said, check all other HSBC threads to convince yourslef that they will cough up the full amount, if not tomorrow then certainly once they receive the claimform...

 

Good luck - one last hurdle. :rolleyes:

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to decide what's best for you - if that is the amount you want to accept then fantastic you've won!!

 

When you accept the offer just make it clear to them that it is full and final settlement for this claim only.

 

The letter just says sign and return if you accept. It says

 

I accept the sum of £525.00 in full and final settlement of this matter against the bank.

 

Signed .............

 

Dated ..............

 

Just to confirm this means that i can still persue for any other charges is that correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I might copy this Cornucopias letter and send this

 

Dear Mr Beaumont,

 

Thank you for your letter dated 5 June 2006 offering me £525.00 of my total claim of £619.00. I am pleased to accept this amount as an interim payment, however, I must inform you that I will be pursuing my claim for the remaining amount.

 

Furthermore, you have applied a further £50.00 unlawfully to my account on 8th June 2006 which means as stated in my previous letter I will revising my claim, increasing the total claim to £669.00. Therefore, I will be taking action to recover a total of £144.00.

 

As a courtesy, I am willing to extend my deadline by a further 7 days before issuing my claim to the County Court.

 

Yours sincerely

 

What do you guys think? If i do this does that mean i do have the 525.00 guaranteed already?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok changed it around a bit got it looking like this

 

Dear Mr Beaumont,

 

Thank you for your letter dated 5 June 2006 offering me £525.00 of my total claim of £619.00. I am willing to accept this amount as an interim payment, however, I must inform you that I would still be pursuing my claim for the remaining amount.

 

Furthermore, you have applied a further £50.00 unlawfully to my account on 8th June 2006 which means as stated in my previous letter I will be revising my claim, increasing the total claim to £669.00. Therefore, I will look to take action to recover a total of £144.00.

 

As a courtesy, I am willing to extend my deadline by a further 7 days before issuing my claim to the County Court. If I have not received any response from yourselves or received either £525.00 or the full £669.00 within 7 days then I take it you will have declined my request and I will continue to begin a claim against yourselves for the full or remaining amount plus interest, plus my costs and without further notice.

 

Yours sincerely

Anyone got any advice or any tips for me that I can add or change on the letter to make it look more professional anything i can add in it about the oft etc etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got off the phone to the bank saying i would be willing to accept the £525.00 as a settlement for this matter if however the additional £50 charge that is due to come from my account tomorrow is removed.

 

They responded with they would not be willing to deal with that and if i accept the £525.00 that refers to £619.00 and any other charges have to be dealt with seperatly and in there own case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

tell them to stuff it, in a nice way ofcourse ;), and continue with your 14 day deadline, then submit your claim,

 

you were trying to be reasonable and save them money by accepting their offer, ah well

 

just stick the extra charge on the top with your claim

HSBC- £4995, settled payment in full

if you found this post helpful, please click the scales (top right of post), ta ;)

 

if you're not sure what to do?, Read the FAQ's

Unsure about what to claim, or confused about overdraft interest? Charges explanation

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone got any advice or any tips for me that I can add or change on the letter to make it look more professional anything i can add in it about the oft etc etc.
I would send this letter as it stands. It is clear and to the point, and puts the bank on notice that it is your claim against them, not the other way around.

 

I would also steer clear of telephoning them at this stage - invariably you will be passed from pillar to post, and it is their intention to frustrate you whenever possible.

 

Good luck.

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/08/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6569 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...