Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I am negotiating with my ex (commercial) landlord's solicitor for a debt I owe for rent. This has been going on for a little while and I expect they may go ahead with the court action they threaten. I wanted to ask however, In the event this action goes ahead, I think will have a response pack sent to me from the court, along with the claim. Google tells me that a section of this response pack is a 'Admit the claim and ask for time to pay'. Would this time to pay, if accepted also mean a CCJ registered against me? Thanks
    • Had identical situation with chairs I bought from eBay. I was directed to Shiply by seller. Contracted Fauzer via  Shiply platform. Basically  Shiply  engages fraudsters to deliver your goods and makes a profit too. Still no chairs in sight. Who is responsible for this fraud? 
    • Thanks @AndyOrch No permission was given to leave the property. I accpeptliability. I was just hoping that I could limit the damage / court action by negotiating a lower settlement with the landlord.
    • It is not as simple as you seem to suggest. 1. My wife needed the car and there are no local public transport facilities within 2 miles. 2 Neither of us has the technical expertise to change a battery. 3 Not only does the battery itself have to be appropriate for stop/start technology; but also, according to the handbook, has to be registered with Mini by a recognised agent, which I am not, neither is Big Motoring World. 4 The car had to be towed. Where was I going to have it towed to where I could be sure it would be properly dealt with? I couldn't trust Big Motoring World to do it. I couldn't have it towed to just any garage and be sure they had the right battery and the time to fit it. 5 The high sum involved is mainly for the diagnostic test which Big Motoring World asked me to obtain; and they did not initially raise any objection to the car being taken to the nearest main dealer. I would not have got the diagnostic test, if they had not asked for one. So, I understand where you are coming from, but having ignored requests for reimbursement, what else could I have done to recover my lay out?
    • Thank you FTMDave.  I'm happy to make your suggested changes.  I'll wait a day or 2 to see if any of the team have any other suggestions or feedback.  Do I then just email a copies to both UKPC and the court? Lookinforinfo - Unfortunately I am not sure if the signs have since been changed and cannot recall seeing any on the night as it was dark.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claim form received from Drydens - MBNA debt poss faulty DN?


tony3x
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3424 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Unfortunatley I don't have the envelope - was thrown away by OH:(

 

I was unsure of the dates as not sure if the amount of clear days includes weekends or not.

 

I thought of something else the other day - They say the account is no longer in dispute as they have satisfied their requirement re the CCA, however they have only sent me the copy of the app form posted earlier whereas in Carey v HSBC the judge states that all copies of the T&C's need to be supplied - they have not even supplied a full copy of the original.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 266
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

A lot of the agreements state T & C's on the reverse but I can't read this anywhere on yours but it does mention a separate booklet so they should have supplied this, as I understand.

 

Always best to keep all the envelopes for a record of what postage was used.

 

The remedy date should be 14 clear days from it being served and the date of service depends on type of post used and 1st or 2nd class.

 

They should only be demanding the arrears, not the full balance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose the next thing is to wait until they send the termination notice and then start the process of appealing the DN.

 

I am still not sure about the remedy date but from reading other threads it seems that it is deemed as being served 2 clear days after posting if 1st Class and 4 days if second, not inc weekends so as Debilde said it is out by either 1 day or 3 days as weekends are inc in the 14 days after being served.

 

Can this be confirmed please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tony,

 

It's unlikely that you will get a termination letter, they will probably have sold it on.

 

In both of my cases they were sold before the remedy date on the DN (both short). I accepted unlawful rescission on the one as the purchasers wrote to me advising they owned the debt before the DN remedy date!

 

In view of the SAR received today, will be doing the same with the other.

 

If you haven't already, this is the time to send in your SAR and get the evidence if it is there. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have seen the name mentioned on here, another DCA I believe.

 

Not had any experience with them myself, not sure if there is any pattern to who they use. May be it depends on who issued the card in the first instance.

 

What date is the letter/card? Was it before the remedy date on the DN.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After over 1 year in court with MBNA I have decided to drop a case - where the only agreement they can produce is a 'true construction' - this is because of recent rulings that mean county court judges will on the balance of probabilities believe whatever is shown to them as an agreement that would have been sent.

 

If you dont read what is on this link and campaign hard to your MP - there will be a shock for anyone who thinks no agreement means unenforceable.

 

https://sites.google.com/site/mbnacomments/

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Not been on for some time but have recently obtained my credit report. Some interesting dates:

 

Default date on credit report is 01/04/10.

Date of letter from MBNA - 09/04/10

Default date on letter - 26/04/10.

 

I know the discussion has been had with regards the dates of letter & default but does the fact that they have reported to the credit agencies a different date have any effect?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it does. The default notice gives you x amount of days to rectify the default (usually missing payments). On the assumption that what you are saying is correct, they have defaulted you before giving you the opportunity to rectify the default. That (to me) is unfair.

 

Have they terminated the account as yet?

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Acc not terminated as yet.

 

They have still not replied to my letter of 22/5 where I stated that I had not had a satisfactory response to my letter of 23/11/09 - this was in response to a letter from them dated 9/4 - same date as DN.

 

I have since received a payment demand from Aegis offering 60% in partial settlement. Asking me to pay by credit card as well!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?196312-Invalid-Default-Notices&p=3168253&viewfull=1#post3168253

 

Hi Tony,

 

Currently being debated on another thread (in answer to post 36)

 

I see they are still giving 17 days on the DN and guess it was 2nd UK mail?

 

They don't send a termination notice either as the DN states that termination will take place if payment not received by remedy date.

 

Although it now seems that termination cannot happen if the DN is invalid. (posts on the thread I have linked here)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi All,

Received this reply from MBNA dated 11/04/11, on 28/04/11, in reply to a letter I sent on 19/04/2010, yes 2010.

 

At first glance it seems that I am stuffed but after further reading I am bit confused. They state that Legal Counsel has advised that the bank can apply for an enforcement order (although they seem not to be able to supply an executed agreement) but further on say that they have no need to seek an enforcement order

 

Any advice please.

 

Also note they have not even signed it or put a name of who it is from. In light of the case in January against them where they lost basically because they did not supply an executed agreement, whats your thoughts.

 

MBNAletter110411.jpg

MBNAletter2110411.png

MBNA3110411.jpg

MBNA4110411.jpg

MBNA5110411-1.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Legal Counsel has advised that the bank can apply for an enforcement order...

 

weasel words - yes they can apply for an enforcement order - without a compliant executed agreement they may have difficulty getting an enforcement order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

weasel words - yes they can apply for an enforcement order - without a compliant executed agreement they may have difficulty getting an enforcement order.

 

I was thinking along the same lines, especially as they later say that they have no need to seek an enforcement order to exercise their rights. Surely they would need one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Nothing on this until toady. Now received a notice from Wescott, sent of behalf of Bank of America giving me information on how I can pay the debt in full (quite good of them) and if I don't contact them it will result in further action.

 

Just ignore?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing on this until toady. Now received a notice from Wescott, sent of behalf of Bank of America giving me information on how I can pay the debt in full (quite good of them) and if I don't contact them it will result in further action.

 

Just ignore?

 

Bank of America are bailing out of UK. They seem to have flogged their bag of lemons on to Wescot (poor deluded fools) so the threat-o-grams are re-appearing. I've had a few recently. Frankly, I have more important things to do in my life than play letter ping-pong with a bunch of losers. If they could legally action these accounts they would have done so by now.

 

MBNA are in the business of fleecing mugs - these may be their 'customers' - or they maybe the DCAs who buy their 'defaulted' accounts.

 

Beware letters written in crayon - they come from the intelligent part of the organisation. :heh:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Help required.

I have today received a court claim form Drydens representing Arrow Global for an alleged ex MBNA debt.

 

my last communication to them was the 14th May when I again asked for confirmation that they hold a fully executed copy of the credit agreement.

 

I did receive another letter from them on the 28th May but did not respond as all it said was that they had been instructed by Arrow Global

to act to recover the 'debt'.

 

Probably should have responded but too late now.

 

Need to know what my next steps are re the claim form.

 

Before anyone asks I have never had PPI and up until things went belly up I had very few charges.

 

Any advice appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...