Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi everyone, I have an update on my case that I’d like to share with you all.  so after submitting 371 pages in my bundle, a witness statement and skeleton argument for my court case due to take place in Manchester on June 21st I got an email from my litigator stating that hmrc have pulled out and the case is now closed!    this is the body of the letter….. This letter, which is copied to the Appellant, pursuant to Rule 17 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009, the Respondents gives notice to the Tribunal of their intention to not defend the above appeal.   The Respondents respectfully invite the Tribunal to allow the appeal and close its file. In lieu of the above the Respondents would respectfully ask the Tribunal to vacate the hearing scheduled for Friday 21 June 2024. We would accordingly invite the Tribunal to close its file. Obviously this is extremely good news which hasn’t sunk in that after 3 years of fighting it is over.    I do have a further fight on my hands in that the Group Action I had joined with Independent Tax that had been disbanded in November last year and I chose not to continue with them. They are trying to bill me over 5k for the work they did under that Group Action which is ludicrous bearing in mind the whole point in joining was that it would keep the cost to a minimum as it would be shared between us all. They had asked if I wanted to continue to have them represent me on an individual level which I declined, if I hadn’t, goodness knows what they would have been trying to charge me now. 
    • President Ruto says Kenyans pay less tax than citizens in some other African countries.View the full article
    • As PM Sunak really showed his true colours at the D Day Commemorations by doing what? Oh I am the British PM lets just leave early I have better things to do and as he is called out on disrespecting all those veterans that served our country for the freedoms we have today he gives a groveling apology to little to late. He knew about this event for a long time and also knew that this is probably the last D Day Commemoration due to the age of those Veterans who gave so much for there countries freedom. Even on the day of the D Day Commemoration he still could have changed his plans As PM and stayed but choose not to showing such DISRESPECT to those Veterans, those that lost there lives and Families for the Freedoms we have today Being a Veteran myself I have never known a PM to show such disrespect what the hell was he thinking SHAME ON YOU PM SUNAK  
    • Thanks. We'll try to help over the weekend. If the hearing is on 05/07 then it's 90% sure that the deadline for filing your WS is 21/06.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

WElcome Finance - Ccj & default for same debt - reclaiming?


kmiah786
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3927 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I just recieved the documents back from Welcome Financial after the SAR Request.

 

Within all its contents, there no no mention of them sending me a default notice, no copies of the default notice nor have they mentioned the postal of such notice in the Account Collection Notes that they have provided.

It does mention that a Default sum notice was ISSUED on 02/01/2009 and the default was placed on my credit file on 11/05/2009, but I do not recall recieving any default notices.

 

What suprises me is with the SAR documents they have sent a Default notice dating 23/11/2010 with no signature and with my address wrong on it.

A letter is also enclosed stating the issue of the default notice also dated 23/11/2010, no signature and wrong or part address.

 

This has really confused me, why are they sending me default notices dating couple

weeks back with no signature and wrong address with the SAR??

If they have sent me a default notice BEFORE they placed it on my credit file, why did they not provide it with the SAR??

If the default was placed on my file in 2009, why are they sending one dating 2010?

PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED LETTERS BELOW:

 

Default Letter.pdf

Default Notice.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I did not recieve any default notices.

The default is on my file as I have recently obtained my credit file and verifyed it was placed on my file on 11/05/2009.

 

The current status of this outstanding debt with them is gone to a stage where they have sent a Attachment of Earnings Order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, my mistake, I meant CCJ.

Is there any way for challenging this debt? I wrote to the court over a month ago informing them of my circumstances and wrote to them that I have since changed employment, but couple of days ago my previous employer informed me that he recieved another AEO which he sent back saying that I no longer work there.

The court has not replied to my letter which has been over a month.

Shall I write to the solicitors who issued the AEO on behalf of welcome finance??? what shall I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I must thank you sincerely for you advise.

 

The CCJ was obtained as stated on my credit file on : 11/05/2009

The solicitors dealing are: Howard Cohen & Co Solicitors

There is no mention of the CCJ proceedings on the SAR return.

 

I have moved home couple of months ago and when i wrote to the court, I did inform them of this. The letter was sent by registered mail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont know of the N1 but I did recieve a form asking me to provide details of my income & expenditure which I did.

After that the court made a suspended attachment of earning order for me to pay £10 per month.

I always made payment in advance via cheque, 2, 6 months in advance via post dated cheques. When I made the 6 months advance payment, before the last 2 payments I went back home for some important matters and on return I totally forgot that the payments were due, I even lost the paperwork and did not know who to pay, where to send, so I sent Howard & Cohen an email requested such information which they did not reply to. After couple of weeks they called me saying if a payment is not recieved, legal action would be taken, I explained that I need details, they said they would post it to me.

Few weeks later, my employers informs me that i have a AOE!!

 

I moved home Sep/2010

Link to post
Share on other sites

The i&e form would normally be post ccj

 

the n1 claim form is normally blue and is issued out of nothampton ccbc court

 

setting aside the ccj is up to a judge but non receipt of the claim form is a valid reason to set aside

 

the debt would still exsist but knowing welcome like i do ill pull there claim apart, with delight as cohen is involved

 

cohen will fight it

 

my score is five out of five with cohen

 

put in a decent defence and he will withdraw any action

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...