Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Finally, finally, finally found it!  It's this para that talks about the legitimate interest and a two-hour parking limit. 57_extracted_WS Combined excl Ex2 .pdf
    • Thank you FTMDave. I've made the suggested changes and will see if there is any other feedback before posting a final copy.  I would be grateful if you could attached the Beavis judgment as I can't seem to find it. Do I also need to attach copies of the other judgments referenced in the WS?  And is there an easy way to find them? Many thank in advance!
    • Hi,  It has been very stressful. I have just received a letter of 'Notice of Transfer of Proceedings' which states the case has been transferred to my local court and to await judge's directions. Is there still a possibility that it will not go to court? The other issue I now have is that I am moving abroad for work in the next few months and now might not actually be able to attend the court hearing!  I am not sure what the best course of action is now. I feel like after all this, the MET are going to win anyway! HELP! 
    • Thanks for jumping in Bazza.  I understand that some people would suggest this.  But no. The moot point is that there should not be any debt.  There shouldn't be any reason for me to be made B.  The lender / receiver are responsible for the property not selling in a timely manner.  Whoever heard of a (well-located nice) property not selling in >5y?    They have no reasons.   Disclosure has subsequently offered staggering evidence which corroborates lender bad behaviour, bribery, and collusion/ interference with the receiver.  I am holding them to account for this.  It is clear they don't want this evidence in the public domain - it will shred their reputation.   (One also has to understand that the ceo - with collusion and conflict of interest (using same lawyers as lender) and receiver - tried to get the property cheap for his own use) They now want to agree a settlement.  I have separately reported a lawyer for negligence to the LO and SRA. I want to report the receiver as soon as I understand how to. I also would like to find some legal means of getting the property sold.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics


datxman
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3646 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Why has my thread been mixed with this one?

Lloyds TSB - Business.

Prelim Ltr sent 3/11/06

 

Rcd 'Thank you for complaining' letter 8/11/06, dated 6/11/06.

 

LBA snt today - 17-11-06, nothing rcd back other than letter above.

 

Rcd ltr from 'Andover Service Rec Cntr' saying they will reply to my comp in the next 2 weeks. ltr rcd yesterday 18/11/06, dated 16/11/06.

 

Received letter from Andover Rec Cntr 25/11/06 dated the 22/11/06 - Saying they do not agree with my complaint.

Rcd ltr from 'Andover Service Recovery Centre' saying they will reply to complaint in next 2 weeks. (Same letter as the 22/11/06). letter rcd 02/12/06, dated 01/12/06.

 

Received reply (I assume) to my LBA letter which was acknowledged on the 2/12/06. Just a load of total babble that doesn't really say anything.

 

28/12/06 - Claim filed at County Court

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 162
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Why has my thread been mixed with this one?

 

????:confused:

Datxman v Lloyds TSB 2006 ** WON** 27/2/2006

With no conditions

Datxman v Capital One 2006

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter sent - July 2006

Non-compliance letter sent - 11/09/2006

enforcement letter sent - 11/09/2006

Statements finally received - 27/09/06

Prelim Letter - sent 28/09/06 - £540

Lowell has bought the debt and I have asked them to wipe it clean due to lack of funds

Datxman v Barclaycard 2006

Won no conditions

 

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Time is running out for the banks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

:confused: I'll get them seperated for you

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was no covering letter other than a compliment slip. Has anyone won the charges back as it has cost me a lot of money in time and paper, etc.

 

Cheers Gary H it is something else to think about before I go for round two;)

 

See the Mindzai and Lucid thread.

 

The bank paid in full the evening before the court cases; M&L then wrote to the court, asking the judge to consider awarding them costs on the grounds of the bank's unreasonable behaviour. They set out their costs, which for three cases came to over £400.

 

The judge wrote, giving the bank one week to respond. They failed to meet the deadline, asked for a one-day extension, then faxed a letter to the court stating they would pay.

 

So far, they have not done so, even though they told the court they would (they faxed the court on, I think, the 16th Feb.)

 

Tim

Link to post
Share on other sites

SC&M are useless, the money appeared in my account on the 23rd of Feb (wish i'd known it was on its way, would have saved me spending a day doing the court bundle), they sent a letter to the wrong address notifying my LTSB had settled, and asked me to notify Poole county court that it was settled, it should have been Durham County Court.

 

I see the threads are still mixed up!!!!!!!!!!

Lloyds TSB - Business.

Prelim Ltr sent 3/11/06

 

Rcd 'Thank you for complaining' letter 8/11/06, dated 6/11/06.

 

LBA snt today - 17-11-06, nothing rcd back other than letter above.

 

Rcd ltr from 'Andover Service Rec Cntr' saying they will reply to my comp in the next 2 weeks. ltr rcd yesterday 18/11/06, dated 16/11/06.

 

Received letter from Andover Rec Cntr 25/11/06 dated the 22/11/06 - Saying they do not agree with my complaint.

Rcd ltr from 'Andover Service Recovery Centre' saying they will reply to complaint in next 2 weeks. (Same letter as the 22/11/06). letter rcd 02/12/06, dated 01/12/06.

 

Received reply (I assume) to my LBA letter which was acknowledged on the 2/12/06. Just a load of total babble that doesn't really say anything.

 

28/12/06 - Claim filed at County Court

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 years later...

I have received a letter from DLC which is acting on behalf of lloyds TSB and that I owe them £700 so I asked for proof of debt this was back in June 2012. I have not heard from them other than they have returned the debt and request back to LloydsTSB.

 

Today I got a letter stating that the debt is mine and that lloyds have a legal duty to collect the money from me.

 

The debt apparently dates back to feb 2007, I am unsure what do now as I asked them to prove the debt but they haven't other than a letter from DLC stating it is my debt.:mad2:

 

Apparently the debt was assigned to Hillesden securities in January 2011:jaw: did I need to be told of this ? as if I was told then I would of questioned this debt.

 

I did have an account with them which was a current account but I closed that account with zero balance back in 2006 as I won my court case against them for bank charges. so I am unsure where this debt would of come from.

 

Please help

 

Thanks in advance

 

DATXMAN

Edited by datxman
additional information

Datxman v Lloyds TSB 2006 ** WON** 27/2/2006

With no conditions

Datxman v Capital One 2006

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter sent - July 2006

Non-compliance letter sent - 11/09/2006

enforcement letter sent - 11/09/2006

Statements finally received - 27/09/06

Prelim Letter - sent 28/09/06 - £540

Lowell has bought the debt and I have asked them to wipe it clean due to lack of funds

Datxman v Barclaycard 2006

Won no conditions

 

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Time is running out for the banks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

What type of account is this?

 

Write to Lloyds and request a full explanation of what the debt is, alternatively a Subject Access Request under the Data rotection Act 1998 requestinf ALL data they hold on you, there is a £10 statutory fee for this and the creditor has 40 days to reply. You can use the template from the |CAG library for this.

 

My guess is that there was a debit outstanding/pending on the account when it was closed.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

what does your cra file say?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't checked my CRA as my debit card only works in the UK and when I try to sign up for noodle etc it says that my card is not recognised I am going to have to do it the old fashioned way and send off £2 to each CRA

Datxman v Lloyds TSB 2006 ** WON** 27/2/2006

With no conditions

Datxman v Capital One 2006

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter sent - July 2006

Non-compliance letter sent - 11/09/2006

enforcement letter sent - 11/09/2006

Statements finally received - 27/09/06

Prelim Letter - sent 28/09/06 - £540

Lowell has bought the debt and I have asked them to wipe it clean due to lack of funds

Datxman v Barclaycard 2006

Won no conditions

 

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Time is running out for the banks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I have sent them a proof of debt letter do they have a set period of time to reply to that letter before making their claim null and void?

 

I am going to write back to the company stating that I asked for proof of debt and that this was not provided. I am willing to go to court as I have no knowledge of this debt and as far as I am aware my account was closed with a zero balance.:-x

Datxman v Lloyds TSB 2006 ** WON** 27/2/2006

With no conditions

Datxman v Capital One 2006

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter sent - July 2006

Non-compliance letter sent - 11/09/2006

enforcement letter sent - 11/09/2006

Statements finally received - 27/09/06

Prelim Letter - sent 28/09/06 - £540

Lowell has bought the debt and I have asked them to wipe it clean due to lack of funds

Datxman v Barclaycard 2006

Won no conditions

 

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Time is running out for the banks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you are not returning to the uk before the 6yrs are up they cant do anything to you anyway.

you cant get a ccj if you live outside the uk and they know so.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in the UK, the problem I have is that my debit card can only be used in the UK and the CRA must bank outside the UK so my card can't be verified.

Datxman v Lloyds TSB 2006 ** WON** 27/2/2006

With no conditions

Datxman v Capital One 2006

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter sent - July 2006

Non-compliance letter sent - 11/09/2006

enforcement letter sent - 11/09/2006

Statements finally received - 27/09/06

Prelim Letter - sent 28/09/06 - £540

Lowell has bought the debt and I have asked them to wipe it clean due to lack of funds

Datxman v Barclaycard 2006

Won no conditions

 

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Time is running out for the banks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

no they are not.

 

i've always used a debit card.

 

have you tried noddle?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The statement on the debit card and the CRAs banking is strange can you explain please, the CRAs all bank in the UK.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have tried experian, equifax and noddle and all of the say that my card cannot be verified.

 

My debit card is issued by Northern Rock and it is limited to use in the UK, if I go to a petrol station and pay at the pump I am ok, but if I go in the shop at the same petrol station then my card gets rejected. The problem is with my card, but I cant and dont want a to get a credit card to so that I can get a credit report.

 

I thought the CRA may use an external source outside the UK to verify your card details and was the reason why my card could not be verified on these site as soon as it is checked by a company outside the UK it will reject it. I can't even buy from Amazon.

Datxman v Lloyds TSB 2006 ** WON** 27/2/2006

With no conditions

Datxman v Capital One 2006

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter sent - July 2006

Non-compliance letter sent - 11/09/2006

enforcement letter sent - 11/09/2006

Statements finally received - 27/09/06

Prelim Letter - sent 28/09/06 - £540

Lowell has bought the debt and I have asked them to wipe it clean due to lack of funds

Datxman v Barclaycard 2006

Won no conditions

 

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Time is running out for the banks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

are there not limited use debit cards?

 

me mrs had one of those

could use it for petrol

where by it checked the balance and said go ahead

 

but could never use it on line nor in shops

 

i dont think it had the visa logo

 

she contacted the bank and they sent one with a visa logo

 

all was fine.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Everyone,

 

I have finally managed to get hold of my credit report.

 

Yes the default is stated on there

but it had two current accounts with the same bank both are in default

- I didn't know you could have two current accounts with the same bank?

 

This debt apparently dates back to 2007 I have no knowledge of what this could be for (honestly)

 

I had sent the proof of debt letter to the DCA asking them to prove the debt

and they have just wrote back saying that the debt is mine and that the bank would like to have the money back

- surely this is not proof I am writing back to them today to say that I do not accept that this is my debt

and that I would like actual proof of this debt.

 

Do they have a set amount of time from me requesting the proof to them providing the proof i.e. 30+12+30 days ?

 

Any advice if I am doing the right thing and what I should do next?

 

Please help me with my questions I am getting distraught over this debt.

 

thanks in advance

 

Datxman

Datxman v Lloyds TSB 2006 ** WON** 27/2/2006

With no conditions

Datxman v Capital One 2006

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter sent - July 2006

Non-compliance letter sent - 11/09/2006

enforcement letter sent - 11/09/2006

Statements finally received - 27/09/06

Prelim Letter - sent 28/09/06 - £540

Lowell has bought the debt and I have asked them to wipe it clean due to lack of funds

Datxman v Barclaycard 2006

Won no conditions

 

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Time is running out for the banks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

as its a bank account CCA'ing them is not an option

 

the 30 days think went out window years ago.BTW

 

what dates of the defaults

and who is the owner

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Both defaults were made the same day in march 2008. I believe the bank will own them but not sure as I have not had any paperwork to say that I was in default.

 

Bank account has not had any money paid in to them since March 2007.

 

I have not heard anything until a company called hillesden securities contact me saying I owed this money and that the debt had been assigned to them but I have no knowledge of this either

Datxman v Lloyds TSB 2006 ** WON** 27/2/2006

With no conditions

Datxman v Capital One 2006

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter sent - July 2006

Non-compliance letter sent - 11/09/2006

enforcement letter sent - 11/09/2006

Statements finally received - 27/09/06

Prelim Letter - sent 28/09/06 - £540

Lowell has bought the debt and I have asked them to wipe it clean due to lack of funds

Datxman v Barclaycard 2006

Won no conditions

 

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Time is running out for the banks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you've made no financial in/out in 6yrs

 

they be sb'ed

 

why are the defaults so far after that date?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep 30 days disappeared ages ago.

 

Are the amounts outstanding on these accounts similar?

 

Perhaps a SAR to the bank is the best option mere.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The defaults were put on my credit file in March 2008 for both accounts.

 

I have not used the account since 2007 so it is within 6 years so it will not be SB'ED

 

I just cant understand why wait this long and why havent I had a default notice or letter of assignment to Hillesden.

 

I am willing to fight this in court even though I may not win.

Datxman v Lloyds TSB 2006 ** WON** 27/2/2006

With no conditions

Datxman v Capital One 2006

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter sent - July 2006

Non-compliance letter sent - 11/09/2006

enforcement letter sent - 11/09/2006

Statements finally received - 27/09/06

Prelim Letter - sent 28/09/06 - £540

Lowell has bought the debt and I have asked them to wipe it clean due to lack of funds

Datxman v Barclaycard 2006

Won no conditions

 

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Time is running out for the banks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep 30 days disappeared ages ago.

 

Are the amounts outstanding on these accounts similar?

 

Perhaps a SAR to the bank is the best option mere.

 

One amount is £771 and the other is £384

Datxman v Lloyds TSB 2006 ** WON** 27/2/2006

With no conditions

Datxman v Capital One 2006

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter sent - July 2006

Non-compliance letter sent - 11/09/2006

enforcement letter sent - 11/09/2006

Statements finally received - 27/09/06

Prelim Letter - sent 28/09/06 - £540

Lowell has bought the debt and I have asked them to wipe it clean due to lack of funds

Datxman v Barclaycard 2006

Won no conditions

 

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Time is running out for the banks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

sri i cant count!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...