Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA, Pension Credit and casual work


gentle-knight
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3903 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am receiving ESA (Support group) due to permanent injuries from a rear end car collision I was in (not my fault). I have been told by the Pension Credit folk in Edinburgh that there is virtually no difference between the two, and the rates will be the same.

 

However, when I am able I do some casual work (as a mystery shopper) and I earn maybe an average of £5 per week. I know this is disregarded, but I'm concerned that if this increases to maybe £25 per week it will affect the pension credit. I think I've found out that PC allows £5 per week but ESA allows £99.50 per week. Is this true? And if so, have I made a mistake applying for the change? It seems to me that the information given me by the PC folk in Edinburgh may have been untrue. I need some help with this please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am receiving ESA (Support group) due to permanent injuries from a rear end car collision I was in (not my fault). I have been told by the Pension Credit folk in Edinburgh that there is virtually no difference between the two, and the rates will be the same.

 

However, when I am able I do some casual work (as a mystery shopper) and I earn maybe an average of £5 per week. I know this is disregarded, but I'm concerned that if this increases to maybe £25 per week it will affect the pension credit. I think I've found out that PC allows £5 per week but ESA allows £99.50 per week. Is this true? And if so, have I made a mistake applying for the change? It seems to me that the information given me by the PC folk in Edinburgh may have been untrue. I need some help with this please.

 

Umm! Being in the support group means you are severely ill that you cannot do any work, so please be careful and do your homework before undertaking any new job, otherwise you'll may find your esa changed by the dwp because they may say your circumstances changed since your last medical.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's not quite correct Helen. It means that I cannot hold down any reasonable part time or full time work. I can do the occasional hour or two a week when I'm feeling able to, and in my own schedule and my own pace. That's exactly why a small amount of work does not affect the claim. I have more than 'done my homework' as you put it. I have spoken with various very helpful people at ESA. The DWP are fully aware of my position, I'm not hiding anything, and I'm not doing anything untoward. The support group fully allows for small amounts of work, recognising that this does not mean you are not so disabled (not 'ill') that you are unable to do full or part time work. That's the point of the really low limit. If you can't work more than the stated number of hours, or the set amount of income, you are not in full time or part time work. Think about it. £25 per week is hardly a part-time job now is it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

DWP do accept that people do have good and bad days. There would only be a problem if the OP worked for more than 16 hours a week / the work contradicted the reason why they can't work.

 

I think I heard it was all changing under universal credit; but I can't quite remember what the changes will be. There's some information here under "working and claiming ESA".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Umm! Being in the support group means you are severely ill that you cannot do any work, so please be careful and do your homework before undertaking any new job, otherwise you'll may find your esa changed by the dwp because they may say your circumstances changed since your last medical.

 

Anybody that is in the Support Group of ESA is entitled under the 'Permitted Work' regulations to work up to 16 hours a week and earn up to £100 a week with no time restrictions (year in, year out).

 

Being in the Support Group does NOT mean that 'you are severely ill that you cannot do any work'. What it actually means is that you have gained more than 15 points from the various descriptors and that you have received the maximum points in one of the Support Group descriptors. This has nothing whatsoever to do with being ill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anybody that is in the Support Group of ESA is entitled under the 'Permitted Work' regulations to work up to 16 hours a week and earn up to £100 a week with no time restrictions (year in, year out).

 

Being in the Support Group does NOT mean that 'you are severely ill that you cannot do any work'. What it actually means is that you have gained more than 15 points from the various descriptors and that you have received the maximum points in one of the Support Group descriptors. This has nothing whatsoever to do with being ill.

 

All correct, but can I just add that it's not only people in the Support Group that can do Permitted Work. The rule applies to anyone on ESA.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All correct, but can I just add that it's not only people in the Support Group that can do Permitted Work. The rule applies to anyone on ESA.

 

I agree, but being in the Support Group there is no 12 month limit as there is in the 'Work group' to work up to 16 hours and earn no more than £100 a week.

 

Many that are in the Support Group continue to work for their employer albeit on reduced hours and/or reduced income. It's a sensible way to increase your benefit income especially if you are in the Support Group.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...