Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 'they' dont send court letters. only a sheriffs court can do that if the debt OWNER is brave enough to request they raise a court claim......... unlike E&W the scottish legal system is far more geared toward empowering the consumer and always put claimants to strict 1000% proof they are the legal owner of a debt, are legally due payment and hold the all the correct enforceable paperwork. just read a few Nolan SPC threads... dx  
    • you would most probably have to raise a court claim naming the dealership and the finance co as joint defendants. you'd win hands down. @BankFodder is best for confirming this. you don't 'contact them' you WRITE expressly exercising your right under CRA, etc as above.
    • Thanks for the reply do you think it’s just a threat for the 14 days or they will send court letters 
    • That’s great, thank you so much. We will contact Doves and the finance company again and hope they will resolve it. Out of interest, where would we stand if we did pay the costs? Would we then be able to claim that back or should we just wait for a response from them before we take the car back from Mercedes?     
    • As I'm off on holiday on Wednesday and won't be around I'll bring things forward and be pessimistic and decide that Iceland won't cooperate.  There are two things to ponder. The private parking companies have a lot in common for obvious reasons.  But also some differences. Excel and its sister company VCS are by far the most litigious.  They take large numbers of motorists who don't pay them to court - perhaps the majority.  That's not because they have a good case.  Indeed their case is rubbish.  It's because, sadly, enough people are terrified of the idea of going to court and just pay up when the court papers arrive.  It's a numbers game to Excel/VCS. In cases where the motorist is in it for the long haul, Caggers win 85% of the time in court against Excel/VCS (yes, I did once go back and counted all the court cases over the previous 30 months).  But Excel/VCS take the odd defeat because of the mugs who just panic and pay.  So take this into account when deciding what to do. Secondly, without boring you with the reasons, I know about the world of local journalism.  Papers have great difficulty in filling their column inches.  If you do contact the local media there is a 100% chance that they will publish something and embarrass Iceland - and maybe get them to back down. Again, have a think if this is a road you want to to go down. If you don't win by Wednesday!  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

employment tribunal october. shall I hire a solicitor ***SETTLED OUT OF COURT***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3933 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have and I'm proud of myself, although it was all your advice and in the nicest way your bluntness Emmzzi that made me realise I need to sort this asap. and Dj stating his experience and my options aswell as others who advised

 

I feel more confident now that the claim has been assessed by two solicitors and both agreed to accept it on a no win no fee basics. We have five weeks until this goes to tribunal so next week is the week to wrap everything up and finalise it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Stuckinarut,

 

Sorry the direct access scheme did not work out for you, but it is always something worth looking into. I know not relevant for your case, but just to make others aware the direct access barrister does not have to be from your area. In fact you can instruct a barrister from anywhere in the country as long as they are direct access trained, although additional travel and expenses would increase your costs.

 

Well done for meeting with the solicitors and negotiating a lower rate of fees, am so proud of you for that and not sure I would have even thought to negotiate. Sounds like you are making huge steps forward in the progression of your case and you must be feeling much relief to now have legal representation.

 

The solicitor is correct that listing ten witnesses is nothing more than an intimidation tactic. It always makes me chuckle to see the lengths big corporations will go to try intimidating people out of taking them to court. My former employer tried all sorts including listing many witnesses, who by the time we were preparing for the full merits hearing and exchanging statements more than 50% were no longer willing to be a witness.

 

Do keep us updated with your progress and as always if you have any questions do not hesitate to ask, there is always someone who will know the answer, or will know how to find the right answer.

 

Stay strong

DJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all

 

Quick update, email was sent from my solicitor today to the responadant and tribunal informing them of me instucting them to act.

 

Within 2 hours I had phonecall off company, save yourself money we are prepared to settle for £ xxxx

I declined and told them liase with my solicitor.

 

At 4.30 this afternoon they have send an email to solicitor double the amount I was offered hours earlier.

 

My solicitor has advised to decline and proceed to tribunal although im thinking of accepting.

 

General opinions please guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

the trade off at this point is usually cash vs stress

 

how many months wages did they offer and how stressful are you finding things?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Second offer was 8000. Solicitor reffered to ventos bands and stated offer is miniumium in middle bracket and hes preapred to present a case in higher bracket of ventos.

 

He didnt explain very well, all I know is he doesnt want me to accept

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be inclined to listen to him - if you lose he doesn't get paid, so..... in his interests to get the best deal he thinks likely

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Stuckinarut,

 

Ultimately it is only you who can make this decision. If you are happy to accept what they have offered then go for it and I would suggest you add a favourable reference to the settlement agreement.

 

Your solicitor does have an invested interest in pushing for an increase to their offer, as the more you get the ore they earn. On the other hand this is a very nice confirmation of the solicitors confidence in the merits of your case and the amount s/he can get for you. If you had a poor case the solicitor would be telling you to settle and they collect their 20%.

 

Personally, I think your former employer are really shi**ing themselves now that you have instructed a solicitor because they know s/he will have them for breakfast in the court room. You have nothing to lose by rejecting their new offer and waiting to see how much they are willing to pay. They will have to consider the cost of a solicitor and a barrister for I think you said a 3 day hearing and if as it seems they believe they will lose, I think you will see their offer increase substantially by the scheduled date for the full merits hearing.

 

But as I said it is only you who can make the decision about whether or not to consider their current offer and there is absolutely no shame in accepting their offer in order to save yourself the stress and hassle of preparing for a full merits hearing.

 

Go with your gut.

 

DJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

My gut is telling me to push them once more and see what there reaction is.

 

But dont want to be seen as playing games.

 

I have said since I put the claim in that id settle for 10, 000.

 

My head is telling me play them at there own game push it out as long as I can and save myself the stress of a 3 day hearing.

 

I think my solicitor knows theres more to be had as this was discussed with him last week and he was expecting an offer this week.

 

I will decline the offer and await there responce.

 

Many thanks all

 

Will keep you updated

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is so not about playing games and your employer will know that with you having taken this case this far and now instructed a solicitor.

 

Go with your gut. I was originally offered £1,000 and kept rejecting their offers until they made one I was happy with. Your ex employer was only too happy to play games and attempt to bully and intimidate you in an attempt to force you to withdraw your case. If I remember correctly they even told the ACAS adviser to butt out? Not so co*k sure of themselves now.

 

At the end of the day whatever amount you do settle for will be no more than you deserve for all the hassle, stress and cr*p they put you through and money is the only language these big corporations understand. Hit them hard and hopefully they will pay attention and think twice before subjecting someone else to their bully boy tactics.

 

Stay strong.

 

DJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Offer was declined this morning. No further offers have been made this was first thing this morning.

 

A few hours ago I had a phonecall from a work collegue. A very senior member of this national company has today travelled from head office to site unannounced and has interviewed all staff on shift with this initial question to all " thanks for your time, im ......... the company's ...... director. As you are aware there has been an ongoing issue with ..... for some time, can you tell me what you know and inform me of any incidents you have witnessed.

 

They were also all asked at end how comfortable do you feel with the managment team. A few have raised issues.

 

also this evening a new manager has been brought to site although we dont know why as of yet.

 

Seems to me as if they got spooked staff have been honest. Mainly supporting my complaints.

 

Lets see what tomorrow brings

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you everybody for all your advice.

 

This has today been settled for 12, 500. Also been paid via chaps today so money been received.

 

Contacted solicitor to make payment and he said im only going to take £100 as we had two consultations and ive sent one letter confirming representation.

 

This has been an experience I do not wish to encounter again. Sadly there is a confidentiality element of my settlement so cant reveal specifics of case.

 

Advice to anyone. Stand up for your rights and get these companies to accepet responsibility for there actions

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations! Persistence pays and well done for holding out. This looks like a good result and I have amended the title of your thread to reflect that it has been settled

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a fantastic solicitor, he did good and wasn't greedy.

Thank you everybody for all your advice.

 

This has today been settled for 12, 500. Also been paid via chaps today so money been received.

 

Contacted solicitor to make payment and he said im only going to take £100 as we had two consultations and ive sent one letter confirming representation.

 

This has been an experience I do not wish to encounter again. Sadly there is a confidentiality element of my settlement so cant reveal specifics of case.

 

Advice to anyone. Stand up for your rights and get these companies to accepet responsibility for there actions

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all. As far as im prepered to go the solicitors were a well established local firm.

 

The cot3 was agreed between parties and I did not disclose this to you all but the settlement was made with me remaining in employment.

 

It was an offer put by company, and solicitor advised to accept it and consider it based on current climate.

 

Since then its come to my attention that the general manager of site and regional manager have both been suspended. They have an acting manager now who was brough in last week who has today contacted me proposing to meet this week to discuss and accommodate my return. I have been assured discreetly that the old manager will not be returning ( just sums up the company)

 

I am undecided although want to hold my head up high to all my collegaues and show them I was inncocent all along.

 

I have nothing to lose attending the meeting so have agreed. I am currently composing a list of points and questions to raise and wish for some experienced answers on what should be asked and discussed In this return to work meeting.

 

If I do return it will not be permanent just until I have secured alternative employment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What strategy. I dont think this will be as easy as it seems. Not made a firm decision as of yet but nothing to lose attending the meeting and meeting new manager.

 

Its not like the head office team will change and they were behind the old manager until I disclosed my evidence and instructed legal team

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...