Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Schipoo and thanks for the update. This is a brilliant result as rergards your fight with HMRC. If you can manage a Donation to the site, it would be greatly appreciated. Let us know how it goes as regards the fees being sought by Independant Tax.
    • A never ending torrent of **it Outrage as ‘tidal wave’ of sewage floods historic market town’s unique chalk river WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Exclusive: Water firm pumps sewage into river Misbourne, Amersham on 21 ‘dry days’ during nearly five month period  
    • Worth noting that all of these firms - either the alleged EIS investment, the rebate company themselves or the payee were all registered to the same address. Clavering House is 3 miles away from HMRC Benton Park view offices.   Wardrop - unfortunately unsuccessful due to late appeal - assessments opened by HMRC in March 2019. Scammed by Richard Hall (Capital allowances consultants ltd - Clavering House) investments into Cryoblast Limited 15/16 (Paul Huggins - Clavering House) and Eco Cooling solutions 16/17 (Anthony Fitches - Clavering House).    Mccuminsky - scammed by Capital Allowances after providing his details to Stefan Brown Alpha Tax Consultants (Clavering House) payment made to Eco Cooling Solutions.    Robson - scammed by Capital Allowances - 15/16 paid to Cryoblast 16/17 paid to Eco Cooling.    Myself - scammed by Allan Maxwell - MaxTax (other business Maxwell electronics) registered to Clavering House.   Cryoblast Solutions and Fast Tax - Alan O’Hara    Please note there are two Cryoblasts involved - Cryoblast limited (Paul Huggins and Clavering House) and Cryoblast Solutions Limited (Alan O’Hara also director of Fast Tax).    My return simply said “Cryoblast” another thing that should have been clarified as part of HMRC guidelines before paying out the claim.    Cryoblast limited was already suspected to be involved in fraudulent claims before my investment as Huntly had open assessments issued in November 2018.    Cryoblast Solutions, the same company director as Fast Tax where my money was sent was dissolved before my claims were submitted. 
    • On the d-day issue, * we know sunaks shameful self-interest preferring a hope at using lies for self-promotion over honoring our heroes, * we know Starmer demonstrated his statesmanship with other statesmen and women,  ** BUT where was Farage? Was he in a pub looking for self-promotion? .. Surely as a wannabe statesman - he should have spent a bit of his (someone elses?) cash attending the ceremonies? or wasn't he offered a seat near enough the front to interest him?   mind you .. "I said I wanted my county back. Well now I want my life back ... I am not a career politician... I won't be changing my mind again, I promise you" - Nigel Farage, stepping down from public life. 5 July 2016  
    • dont need them.   let the defendant play the terms game
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

TBI Finance chasing old year 2000 CCJ - they wont go away!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3837 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Should the letter also refer to the lack of definitive evidence that a judgement was even obtained?

 

Covered in the last para. Sem.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here goes, the screen notes are quite long but ive condensed it here

 

24/12/12 – Merit File received Box 26

11/03/13 – Received a call from xxx said they received the letter but been in property for 3 years and O/C never lived there, said property is housing new build.

11/03/13 – Issue to new address (correct one)

03/04/13 – Customer has sent “copy” of ltr sent to Merit dated 29.12 wuth a data SAR stating not responded to and do not harass! Looks like using all delaying tactics as various lts on merit file including statute barred letter

03/04/13 – Personal ltr to OC req Immed Props and stop delaying

17/04/13 – Ltr from OC states all corresp with Merit was sent recdel and he always recs assistance with writing ltrs from his partner/family and CAB. Says if we do not stop contacting him he will make a formal complaint to the FOS and others !!!

17/04/13 – Ltr to OC with COA SOA Copy judgement claim and out complaints proc adv him will be passing to solicitors if not dealt with amicably

13/06/13 – GB Search lists mobile number as (correct one) at C/F Add, for O/C TELE Mobile L/MESS TTO. Also L/Line Number listed OOS (Correct one)

14/06/13 – Borrower called office he said he will not S/W TBI on phone anymore and if we want to correspond then all must be in writing.

 

 

18/06/13

 

CHIVERS NOTES

11/07/2000 – Papers to tracing agent

01/09/2000 – Tracing agent instructed

10/10/2000 – Seven day LBA

20/10/2000 – Default claim generated for CCBC

23/10/2000 – Summons issued on 23/10/2000

23/10/2000 – JMT available on 09/11/2000

23/10/2000 – Summons issued on 23/10/2000

23/10/2000 – Default claim regenerated : for CCBC

27/10/2000 - Default claim regenerated : for CCBC

09/11/2000 – JMT requested

09/11/2000 – JMT to be paid forthwith

09/11/2000 – request for judgement (CCBC)

09/11/2000 – Request for judgement generated

09/11/2000 – JMT entered for 13/10/2000

15/11/2000 – Attachment of earnings search

15/11/2000 – Request for judgement (CCBC) reversed

15/11/2000 – JMT requested

15/11/2000 – JMT to be paid forthwith

15/11/2000 – request for judgement (CCBC)

15/11/2000 – Request for judgement generated

15/11/2000 – JMT entered for 17/11/2000

28/11/2000 – Tracing agent instructed

05/01/2000 – Tracing agent instructed

20/02/2001 – Enforcement warning notice

26/02/2001 – Enforcement warning notice

14/03/2001 – Letter to DFT – threatening Bankruptcy

26/03/2001 – Tracing agent instructed

12/07/2001 – Transfer action to another county court

24/08/2001 – Tracing agent instructed

14/09/2001 – Letter to Client Unsuccessful trace

24/09/2001 – Case Closed (RUN) on 24/09/2001 by automatic processing

25/09/2001 – Case reopened on 25/09/2001

12/01/2004 – To Client with results of OCE

26/02/2004 – Case Closed (STOR) on 26/02/2004

Then it goes back to the later comments –

18/06/2013 – Issued in Northampton Bulk centre, xxxxxxx CCJ 17/11/00 £xxxx, trans to Yorkm, AOE issued Fee £50 OS Bal £xxxx

20/06/2013 – PJ Letter sent

02/07/2013 – Lt Recd from OC enclosing P/O for £10 asking for copies of everything … Passed to LB to respond.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didnt find any other documents that were any better but interesting what you say Sequenci about Attachment of Earnings. To be sure here is a copy of the section saying about AOE (attached)

 

Brigadier, please confirm what you said should be still sent.

 

Regards

Edited by yorkshirecagger
Link to post
Share on other sites

Brig's letter is good to go. What's entertaining is that their SAR actually demonstrates that no activity was undertaken to try and enforce the judgment or chase for payment in all those years. They have spectacularly shot themselves in the foot as you have documentary proof that they've rested on their laurels - as such the application for the AOE should be refused.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Sequenci

I will send Brigadiers letter to them tomorrow, just one question for clarification.. What is attachment of earnings order and what will happen about that? I dont want them contacting my employer - Or will they have already done that?

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

An attachment of earnings order is a court order which allows for payments to be directly deducted from your wages - your employers would of course be made aware of the judgment. What's important to bear in mind are two things:

 

a) their application can be challenged due to the time it's taken fro them to enforce - generally speaking anything over 6 years is usually rejected by the courts

b) where there is a legitimate AOE application, this can be suspended by a court order allowing you to make direct instalments to the creditor. So long as you stick to the arrangement the actual attachment would never go ahead. Given what you've said I'm not sure you need to be worrying about your employers too much at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

better you pdf your letters

 

set your default scan page size to A4 less than 300DPI [150 will do]

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets - as a picture[jpg] file

don't forget you can use a mobile phone or a digital camera too!!

'

BUT......

ENSURE: remove all pers info inc. barcodes etc using paint program

but leave all monetary figures and dates.

*********************************************************

{DO NOT USE A BIRO OR PEN OR USE SEE THRU TAPE OR LABELS]

try www.pdfescape.com TO BLANK STUFF,

*************************************************************

or

DO IT IN MSPAINT.EXE or any photo editing program

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites ...

http://freejpgtopdf.com/

..

if you have multiple scans/pics

put them in a word doc FIRST and convert that to PDF

or use www.pdfmerge.com

 

convert existing PC files to PDF [office has an installable print to PDF option]

..

 

it would be better to upload a multipage pdf if

you have many images too rather than many single pdfs

.

or if you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

or use word and save as pdf

try and logically name your file so people know what it is.

though dont use full bank names or CAG in the title

i'e Default notice dd-mm-yyyy TSB

.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok sorry called away, send it as is, they are going to attempt to resurrect that old CCJ, which can oppose, personally I cannot see

a court allowing an AOE after all this time.

 

I would suggest checking with York CC to see exactly what the court ha received from NCCBCC.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again, one the request to York CC to see what has been sent from the other court and to find out about attachment of earnings request please can you tell me how I would contact them? Would I state the claim reference or would I write to them just with my name and request anything they have in my name?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, The Claim No. The Name of the Claimant, your name and address should be enough, you can phone the court office, most are open 1000hrs to 1400 hrs Monday to Friday, or write to the Court Manager with the details.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

been reading this with interest and speaking from experience from ICF Ltd to Merit Finance Ltd if their is a CCJ their is nothing at all to stop TBI going to court to resurrect such and be substituted as the new claimant as mine was after a 10 year period to but Merit took me back to court and the Judge stated that regardless of the length of time it has taken Merit to take this matter back to court and to be substituted as the new claimant as the original CCJ was still in the old claimants name his words were

 

"THAT DOES NOT DETRACT FROM FACT THAT I STILL OWE THE MONEY" and had no problem at all in granting them the substitution and a CO to boot and believe me I fought tooth and nail quoting all laws available to me regarding this issue and spent month upon month building what I thought was a concrete defense but all fell on deaf ears in court and just to add insult to injury I then also got hammered with costs.

 

What appears to be the Law and the Judges interpretation of the law are two completely animals hence the saying the law is an ass, just speaking from own experience, plenty people on this site said i just got a bad judge but I replied to that by saying "show me one thread on this site that has challenged these issues about length of time given to resurrect a CCJ and to be substituted as the new claimant, whom have been to court and won" and I am still awaiting a reply ( that was about a year ago) all I am saying is please tread carefully.

Edited by the tinkerman
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

OK thanks for that Tinkerman.

 

I can afford to pay for some specific legal advice and representation and think it would be worth it at this stage knowing what I know based on their feedback in SAR re earnings attachment etc.

 

Can someone recommend a firm to approach for this either that or please give me some certainty based on what has just been said. I need to be a few steps ahead on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the letter drafted, then check the court it will now mean that this will have to go to a hearing we need to see exactly what they come up with it is difficult to speculate on what may transpire.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK I will send the letter.

 

What amazes me is how it sounds like the county court works!

 

I find it amazing to think that I could be taken to court for something with out a notification from anyone at TBI or from the court and not given a date of a hearing to be given the option of providing legal representation to make sure things are dealt with fairly on the day - as has been said the judges interpretation is what counts so without representation to sway their thinking its completely one sided!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you had no prior knowledge of the original claim it would be useful fighting this proposed AOE.

 

The County Court system is in my opinion the fairest civil law court probably in the world.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I contacted a couple of solicitors over my case and basically after discussing it with them both I was told that the claimant had a case, One would not take it on and the other quoted wait for it £21,000 to take my case so went it alone and as I stated ended up with a CO and substantial costs against me,will be watching this thread with interest, please let me know how you get on and good luck hope you have a better outcome than I did.

Edited by the tinkerman
Link to post
Share on other sites

Citizens Advice Bureau might have a list of Solicitors in your area that might still have the half hour reduced fee system.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry tinkerman...have edited your post as we don't permit the names of these companies to be promoted on CAG.

Thank you ims!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

 

I had no prior knowledge of any CCJ at all until 2010 when I heard from Merit. Because they claimed it was 10 years old I didn't worry about it and sent the letters mentioned early in the post.

 

I will go to CAB and discuss with them showing them this thread as detail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still send the letter, it will let them know you are aware of these tactics.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...