Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

No original agreement of debt causing stress after bereavement of child please help


didnotknow
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3854 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

gotta be toxic as moorcrap are offering a discount

 

an sar might be interesting too

 

to Lloyds that is.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please help had this as a response to my Consumer credit agreement request section 77/78.

I never said to use the £1.00 to pay towards the loan that i have not got so what do i do now?

 

 

no wonder this country is in a mess with idiots of a bank and also the same with this government.

They are in default of your request and cannot do anything about the account in question to enforce anything until they comply.

 

Stern letter needed to them stating the £1.00 was the statute amount for a CCA1974

Request with a 12+ 2 deadline,

no mention to you regarding a loan account amount to pay in,

any further misdirecting request will result in a formal complaint to the Regulator. signed xx x x xxxx

 

also refer or even send copy of your CCA1974 request, recorded delivery.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

wonder if they've sold it? they've recently sold a batch. or maybe the wrong a/c number? or the payment got separated? not sure. did they return the quid? anyway, as said above, its not a payment 'into' anything, it is re a statutory request

perhaps do give them a call? see what they say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply will send stiff letter on Monday

 

Defiantly not been sold on i think they deleted all the records in 1998 due to them acting illegally due to mental health problems as we were unfit to deal with our financial affairs but unfortunately for the bank i still have evidence.

 

Lloyds TSB have refused to answer any of my questions so far.

 

I know Lloyds TSB are reading these posts just to let them know this complaints going to go all the way and refusing to answer my questions is just showing you up for what you are

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have been known to look in on cag! sad on them for doing so, they can't get their own affairs in order, so they have to look in on consumer forums!

ok, do a letter see what they come back with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please see a letter which i wil be sending Monday if its alright.

Rang them for a reference number to send complaint to no reference number as it was never logged.

 

 

your reference number xxxxxxxxxx

This is a prime example how i was treated when my daughter was dying of cancer even though the bank was informed of our mental health problems as we were unfit to deal with our financial affairs.

Why does the bank keep misdirecting me?

Also refusing to answer any of my questions?

You are supposed to be treating me with respect and courtesy which you are not.

P.O box 43 Peterlee County Durham SR8 2YQ

This is where you sent my request to for a CCA1974 Request with a 12+ 2 deadline, (which has now expired)

the authorities being informed.

Edited by didnotknow
dont want bank to see it
Link to post
Share on other sites

Only the service delivery manager sent the reply and there is no records of them receiving or replying other than the manager who replied as there are no records on their system which does not surprise me the manager does not work saturdays.

 

One good thing they stamped the request with their stamp and returned it with the letter

 

As usual they tried to hide any evidence of anything at all will be interesting when i receive or if the Subject Access Request turns up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry i have deleted the image of the letter due to lloyds tsb finding it as if they have no records of the letter they wont know what the reply was so the idiots are going to hang themselves because its obvious they don't know the regulations.

I think it would be best not to inform them of their blunder so when it goes to the authorities they wont have a clue and will look like complete idiots.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just posting up a letter ive sent to lloyds tsb not holding my breath for a response have had nothing so far from customer care it seems a 1 way discussion with them but im sure they will when it goes to the ICO and the Ombudsman has anyone got any idea why they don't answer to my mail even though it is all sent recorded or have they all gone on holiday

 

This is an official complaint

 

I am now requesting a Senior manager to deal with my complaint as i believe that you are not capable of dealing with my complaint fairly and truthfully please let me know if you are refusing this request if the bank has no one or does not want to deal with this complaint i am more than happy to go to the ombudsman and the ICO.

 

The FSA Conduct of Business Source book rules make it illegal for your bank or your credit card issuer or your lender to treat you unfairly.

It should be noted that banks cannot act illegally either by treating you unfairly directly - or through their agents.

 

I am asking for my questions to be followed by a simple answer so it would be eligable for myself. If you are not willing or able to abide by this request please let me know in writing,within 14 days If I do not hear from you i take it you are accepting this request.

 

Why does the bank keep thinking we are idiots?

 

Why does the bank keep misdirecting me?

 

You are supposed to be treating me with respect and courtesy which you are not.

 

Durham, This is where you sent my request to under CCA1974 Request with a 12+ 2 deadline, (which has now expired) which is a legal request.

The reply from the manager No mention to you regarding a loan account amount to pay.

 

I also contacted the department on the letter and they have no record of receiving the letter or the reply they sent.

Please see the reply letter you should already have.

 

I am also requesting another copy of the original reply and also a copy of the original request i made under CCA1974 within 14 days.

If you have not got the original reply and also a copy of the original request i made please explain why.

 

Due to the CCA1974 Request with a 12+ 2 deadline having past the reply will stand as the official reply to my request.(In my opinion is a clear defaut of the request)

Lending Code March 2011 Section 178 onwards.

 

when a debt is reasonably queried or disputed, failing to investigate and/or provide details (possibly including, for example, details of account history, payment schedules and relevant correspondence) to the debtor, as appropriate, in a timely manner or at all.

 

Due to the banks actions i am now having to make a complaint about the way i am getting treated now from the customer care department,Is this why we are getting refused access to a manager ?

This is a prime example how we were treated when our daughter was dying of cancer even though the bank was informed of our mental health problems as we were unfit to deal with our financial affairs.

And my original complaint (dispute) has not even started yet.

 

All replies in writing.

 

I would like a reply within 14 days.

 

Please read all my letters correctly and carefully without skipping through them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

seems ok dnk. see what they come back with.

whether they will address ALL of the issues remains to be seen. afaik, they don't often do so. only what suits them.

one poss reason why they aren't responding could be due to their 'final response' policy. have they sent one of those? basically where they say that they will not comm further, take it to the ombuds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an image of the first letter they sent me and they have never sent me anything since even though i sent a letter with 3 issues on the only thing i have heard is from different departments 1 from durham which was for CCA1974 Request and also a reply from the dsar team.

they will have no alternative but to answer the questions as i have requested.

I am asking for my questions to be followed by a simple answer so it would be eligible for myself. If you are not willing or able to abide by this request please let me know in writing,within 14 days If I do not hear from you i take it you are accepting this request.

The chances of a reply within 14 days is very unlikely so the request above would have to stand unless they want to be in default of that as well.

P.jpg

Edited by didnotknow
Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, is with the ombuds. loyds ask for you to write, which you have done. see what they come back with. if they don't reply, inform the ombuds accordingly? inform the ombuds anyway of their letter?

btw, what was the ombuds letter that they received? if it is all now with the ombuds, maybe best to communicate with the ombuds only? let the ombuds deal? see what others think?

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

The bank would not communicate with me at all so i contacted the ombudsman and they instructed the bank to deal with alll issues the ombudsman informed us that they would probably take the case up if they did not do as instructed or 8 weeks passed from the letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep going and stay strong, I love the I know nothing bit in their letter. "providing information about what your concern is about"

Good luck and dont let the b**gers grind you down. The only practicle help I can give is when they finally get the noose around their necks I would be glad to kick the steps away for you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

When i contacted the Durham department i quoted this.

Due to the CCA1974 Request with a 12+ 2 deadline having past the reply will stand as the official reply to my request.(In my opinion is a clear defaut of the request)

PP1.JPG

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...