Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • yes might be the best idea. you'd only at best get 8% flat interest and that unusual on a GOGW if this was what it was. simply contact the FOS and let them know its resolved. dx  
    • If you’ve ever wondered how you might fare in armed combat, the first 20 minutes of Steven Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan is likely to make you thank your lucky stars you were born too late to storm the Normandy beaches on June 6 1944. I suspect many of us might be driven to identify with those men who were absolutely turned to stone by fear. And yet these young men, mainly conscripts, screwed their courage to the sticking point and did the job the fate had chosen for them, heroes all.   .. UK PM Sunak perhaps thinks he understands mind numbing fear better than many as he dishonorably fled the beachhead to do nothing more than double down on dishonest spin and lies from the safety of a UK studio .. The Normandy heroes who not only held their positions, but advanced through hell to a victory that changed the entire course of history .. undoubtedly hold a different perspective.     from a perspective in TheConversation     .. 'That was the slot that sunaks team offered for the interview
    • Yes, send a message to the purchaser but keep it very friendly and simply that you noticed that the package has now been delivered.  I suggest that you ask them if they want to keep the package still or if they would rather return it and that if they want to keep it then please will they return your payment to you to your PayPal address. Keep it as polite and friendly as possible and then we will decide what to do if he doesn't reply or refuses.  Meanwhile I will have a look at Google earth and see if you are able to spot the gas meter outside the house to get an idea if the delivery is real. Get a screenshot
    • Santander have sent their final response and have agreed that they were in the wrong. They will be refunding me the amount I am due and £50 for the delay.  Just the interest factor would be more than double the £50 that they are offering. Thinking to just close this and move on. Is this what you would do?  Opened a FOS case on the 1st of June but haven't heard back yet. 
    • It just been delivered and ive had a live chat with p2g to get some proof of deliverey and they send me a picture of the parcel placed in a gas meter box which they class as a ' 'Safe Place'  and not placed into the hands of the buyer which is either a good thing as the buyer can claim he never received It so i can claim against p2g or a bad thing . Do p2g have coordinators when taking pictures and scanning of parcels ?  I know Royal Mail do ... I'm going to send the buyer a message and see what he says
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3992 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

that's ok , just missed a month.

 

theres nothing wrong in paying what you can whwn you can.

 

shows goodwill where it might be seen as avoidance in a way.

 

go well for him IF it ever went to court

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dishidox,

#DX100 has asked me to look in on this.

 

In my opinion if a statutory demand is made it could be set aside because this company has not exhausted the lesser methods of debt collection up to including a county court claim.

The bankruptcy process should be the last resort of the debt collection procedures.

 

I can if need be draft a letter for you later today.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dishidox,

#DX100 has asked me to look in on this.

 

In my opinion if a statutory demand is made it could be set aside because this company has not exhausted the lesser methods of debt collection up to including a county court claim.

The bankruptcy process should be the last resort of the debt collection procedures.

 

I can if need be draft a letter for you later today.

 

The grounds for setting aside a statutory demand (as per Rule 6.5 Insolvency Rules 1986) are as follows:

 

(a)the debtor appears to have a counterclaim, set-off or cross demand which equals or exceeds the amount of the debt or debts specified in the statutory demand; or .

(b)the debt is disputed on grounds which appear to the court to be substantial; or .

©it appears that the creditor holds some security in respect of the debt claimed by the demand, and either Rule 6.1(5) is not complied with in respect of it, or the court is satisfied that the value of the security equals or exceeds the full amount of the debt; or .

(d)the court is satisfied, on other grounds, that the demand ought to be set aside.

 

There is nothing to prevent a creditor using the bankruptcy route rather than the country court route, so do ensure that one of the above grounds is considered - otherwise a set aside may not be granted at the hearing, and it could trigger further costs. I agree, in principle, with what you're saying - that bankruptcy should be a last resort, and luckily most judges will totally agree with you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi brigadier thank you ever so much for looking at this and please could you draft a letter as I'm way out of depth with this, but I'm trying to help a desperate friend

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi brigadier thank you ever so much for looking at this and please could you draft a letter as I'm way out of depth with this, but I'm trying to help a desperate friend

 

Ok will do that for you as soon as I can.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

DCA +Copy to Creditor.

I'm just waiting for some docs to come through that are urgent, the I'll get on to the letter.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is the original thread with the right attachment sorry for any confusion

 

hello everyone,

im trying to get some advice for my friend who is in fiancial difficulty at the minute, he got made redunant 2011

 

after being on the dole a while they helped him set up a business,

 

everything was going well but the work started slowing down,

 

he had a account with a builders merchant that was fine,

he asked to pay reduced payments for a while to get himself back on track as work is slow,

 

they agreed but now want silly repayments back £500 per month

 

he said he couldnt afford it and offered £100

they said no but will accept £250 per month,

 

he wrote back saying

im sorry payments too high i dont want to say yes then cant pay

please accept my payments of £100,

 

received a letter(see attached ) this morning threating bankruptcy

 

he doesnt own his home he lives with his girlfriend in he rown house (he is not on mortage) hes in bits & worried sick,he wants to pay the debt but they are being unreasonable

if anybody could give some advice for him it would be greatly received

 

 

 

To Whom it may concern.

 

Re: Proposed Statutory Demand For Payment.

 

I refer to the letter date xx xx xxxx threatening the issue of a Statutory Demand for Payment regarding a debt in the sum of £ xxxx.xx relating to a trade account with xxxxxxxx builders merchants.

 

 

For your information and for the avoidance for misunderstanding please note the following;

 

I xxxxxxxx state that I have no realisable assets to meet any such demand.

I do not own outright or jointly any property.

I have made reasonable offers of payment of the outstanding amount which have been rejected without due consideration to my current financial status.

I am able to make an offer of £xxx.xx per calendar month which should be given reasonable consideration.

Should a statutory demand be made I will apply for it to be set aside for the reasons stated above.

 

All due consideration should be given to the above and the saving of costs and court time.

 

Signed..........................: Date...............................: print name.

 

Witness to signature...............Date.........................: print name.

 

Apologies for delay called away.

Edited by BRIGADIER2JCS

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

To Whom it may concern.

 

Re: Proposed Statutory Demand For Payment.

 

I refer to the letter date xx xx xxxx threatening the issue of a Statutory Demand for Payment regarding a debt in the sum of £ xxxx.xx relating to a trade account with xxxxxxxx builders merchants.

 

 

For your information and for the avoidance for misunderstanding please note the following;

 

I xxxxxxxx state that I have no realisable assets to meet any such demand.

I do not own outright or jointly any property.

 

.

 

Apologies for delay called away.

 

 

Please don't take this the wrong way. Whilst this may be a good reason for the litigator not to pursue a Bankruptcy petition, it is hardly a reason for a court to dismiss one.

 

Bankruptcy is after all a condition where one does not have the means to meet thier obligations, by its definition.

 

I take it that his is not an application for a charging order or the like.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Creditor is not going to achieve the outcome it desires if a petition is made and I would expect them to get far less than they would if they accepted a repayment plan, even if they made a claim via the county court.

 

BTW I have achieved SD set aside on exactly the same grounds for others in this situation when there are no realisable assets, judges perceive how pointless such action is in this situation.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everybody for all the advice all letters sent now just wait to see what happens I'll keep you all posted

 

Let's hope this gets sorted out now!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you brigadier vue been a star

 

Always happy to help!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Everybody,

My friend has received this letter back from the dca company this morning ( please see attched)

also he sent a letter again asking builders merchants to accept monthly payments for £100 plus he put a cheque for £100 in with it (letter dated 28.05.2013) £98.64 has been deducted from the amount in this last letter

any advice would be greatly received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well at least they are going the CCJ route not BR.

 

So I would suggest he sends this to the BM now.

 

 

Si/Madam,

 

I refer to my recent letter regarding the payment of the outstanding amount of £xxxx.xx with which I enclosed a payment of £100.00 and offered to clear this debt at this rate per calendar month, the cheque has been cashed.

 

I had expected some understanding of my situation and that you would give due regard to this reasonable offer although it seems I was mistaken having now received your letter dated xx xx xxxxx stating you that you are issuing a county court claim.

 

I would urge you to reconsider my reasonable offer once again as I will be stating in court how I have tried to resolve this matter without recourse to litigation ad as with court costs, solicitors cost added to the balance should you achieve a judgement I shall have to ask the court to order a much lower level of payment.

 

So I confirm that my offer of £100.00 pcm stands despite previous rejections and would suggest that this accepted to save costs and court time.

 

OK recorded deliver addressed to their Company Secretary.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hello everyone,

just an update since the last letter my friend has received nothing from anyone so hes just been paying the £100 as he agreed to do, he sent all the letters he received from the debt people to oft and trading standards which there looking into, so all is quiet at the min, thank you all for your brilliant advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...