Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Employment issues regarding failure to make reasonable adjustments


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3982 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I'm not sure if I am on the right area to ask for any help or advice following a long period of sick leave from work and issues regarding failure to make reasonable adjustments. Going through he'll with my employer at the min and can't seem to find any advice.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been through this myself

 

There is no automatic right for an employer to make reasonable adjustments, only a duty.

 

Reasonable adjustments need not be expensive, and the employer is not required to do more than what is reasonable.

 

Reasonable depends on the size of the company and any economic fators in making any reasonable adjustments.

 

If the employer is aware of your disability and does nothing proactive to support your working conditions, then you are entitled to bring a claim to an Employment Tribunal

 

Reasonable adjusmants are only reasonable providing it is reasonable for your employer to make..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, yes you are in the right place. What adjustments do you need, who has recommended them, and how many employees does your employer have?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am going through the same thing at the moment, loads of information on equality act. the PCS union site and ACAS sites have good information as does baiili.

 

I work for a public body and there are extra duties placed upon those bodies. some interesting cases have just been decided at the European court also.

 

there are lots of binding cases that have been decided at employment appeal tribunals which have set numerous precedents in law.

 

I keep finding more and more examples of employers discriminatory acts the more research I have conducted. other sites such as XpertHR also have some examples

 

note to mods I I hope I haven't broken any rules by mentioning other sites? if so please advise.

 

IMO the OP would gain valuable information from perusing these and other sites

I am fighting it all the way :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO the op needs to give more information to get proper advice

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, please provide more information that would allow the more experienced caggers to assist. :-)

 

I have had advice from my union rep which has been great, but through my own research whilst off sick this past month has proved invaluable in identifying other incidents and acts of discrimination that at first glance seem to be acceptable. Once you understand the Equality Act you will feel less intimidated by bullying bosses and their terrible approach to disabled employees.

 

in my experience

I am fighting it all the way :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thanks for the responses. I have been off work for 28 weeks following a shoulder injury. I work in a laundry in a nursing home. It's 45 bedrooms and I work alone on a 7 on 7 off basis. I began to suffer problems and my employers were less than helpful so I came out of work on sick to try and find the cause. It is believed I have a condition called thoracic outlet syndrome but has not yet been confirmed as I am waiting on neurologist app to confirm this. I am also under the chronic pain team, physio, shoulder specialist. I have recently qualified for low rate dla due to the condition that has been ongoing for 2 years and doesn't look set to resolve any time soon.

 

I have always wanted to return to work as chronic pain has already taken so much from me. I am desperate to retain my independence. Work seemed happy to allow me to come back until I submitted my fit note. We had discussed a phased return doing 5 full shifts out of 7 but I explained to my employer this would depend if the doctor would agree to this straight away.

 

The doctor wouldn't agree to this as she felt it would be detrimental to my recovery and advised 7 shifts doing 4 hours a day to begin with. Bear in mind that all the time I have been off there has been nobody covering my sick leave it has been other members of staff putting laundry in as and when. I was told that at least being in 7 days would mean that the laundry was staffed each day and that they couldn't see it being a problem,

 

I returned to work to be met at the door by the boss who asked me to come in to the office for a "little chat" that's when she explained that she wouldn't agree to this as she couldn't get cover for the remaining two hours of my shift so she sent me home. Even though the laundry wasn't staffed that day and there was an outbreak if d&v in the building.

 

What I also couldn't understand was that 2 employers have been allowed to drop their hours over ill health but I was only asking for a reduction in hours for a phased return and not permanently.

 

I was now employed without a wage as my ssp had run out and they wouldn't let me back. I consulted the law centre who put me in touch with a solicitor who said that she believed I may have a case for discrimination and faliure to make reasonable adjustments,

 

There's much more to say but I don't want to appear as I am waffling

Link to post
Share on other sites

The solicitor is correct. Put the request for a phased return in writing and ask for a written reply. This signals that you are gathering an audit trail and may make the employer think again.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

seems to be a clear case of them failing to make adjustments, going against medical advice is frowned upon. have they suggested any alternative work that may not aggravate your condition?

 

it has been found at a tribunal appeal to be reasonable to move an employee into anothers role to keep the disabled employee in employment.

 

the scope of the act is quite extensive and case law has made inteteresting reading. you will be surprised at how far employers have to go

I am fighting it all the way :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thanks for the responses. I have been off work for 28 weeks following a shoulder injury. I work in a laundry in a nursing home. It's 45 bedrooms and I work alone on a 7 on 7 off basis. I began to suffer problems and my employers were less than helpful so I came out of work on sick to try and find the cause. It is believed I have a condition called thoracic outlet syndrome but has not yet been confirmed as I am waiting on neurologist app to confirm this. I am also under the chronic pain team, physio, shoulder specialist. I have recently qualified for low rate dla due to the condition that has been ongoing for 2 years and doesn't look set to resolve any time soon.

 

I have always wanted to return to work as chronic pain has already taken so much from me. I am desperate to retain my independence. Work seemed happy to allow me to come back until I submitted my fit note. We had discussed a phased return doing 5 full shifts out of 7 but I explained to my employer this would depend if the doctor would agree to this straight away.

 

The doctor wouldn't agree to this as she felt it would be detrimental to my recovery and advised 7 shifts doing 4 hours a day to begin with. Bear in mind that all the time I have been off there has been nobody covering my sick leave it has been other members of staff putting laundry in as and when. I was told that at least being in 7 days would mean that the laundry was staffed each day and that they couldn't see it being a problem,

 

I returned to work to be met at the door by the boss who asked me to come in to the office for a "little chat" that's when she explained that she wouldn't agree to this as she couldn't get cover for the remaining two hours of my shift so she sent me home. Even though the laundry wasn't staffed that day and there was an outbreak if d&v in the building.

 

What I also couldn't understand was that 2 employers have been allowed to drop their hours over ill health but I was only asking for a reduction in hours for a phased return and not permanently.

 

I was now employed without a wage as my ssp had run out and they wouldn't let me back. I consulted the law centre who put me in touch with a solicitor who said that she believed I may have a case for discrimination and faliure to reasonable adjustments.

 

I then went back to my work place and explained that this is what I had been advised but I desperately wanted to sort it out between us and not go down a legal route. I was told they still wouldn't agree to the first fit note and that she had checked with her solicitor and disability didn't apply to them it was just something that gave me extra money each month. She then said that if my employer would agree to 5 full shifts she would look into it but it had to be stated in full on my fit note exactly what the doctor required and that I was to also send in a covering keep tater with this second fit not stating exactly what I could and couldn't do and what I believed would help me back to work and she would consider it.

 

The second fit note stated as requested no more than 4 full shifts over 7 even though my doctor wasn't happy she understood my need to go back to work. My covering letter explained that withou coming back it would be impossible for me to determine what I could and couldn't do and gown much pain I would be in.

I asked if the night staff could do any of the clothes that came down in the night where possible, but that I understood that this would not always be possible due to situations that can arise in the night.

I asked that washing instructions be placed on the wall for all staff to see, to avoid damage to people's clothes and to ensure items were washed at correct temperatures to avoid contamination.

I asked for steps to reach the top tubs but was advised that due to possible falls etc this could not be considered.

 

The letter I received back was that they would agree to this phased return and that they would put into practice the small adjustments I had asked for as until it had been put into practice the couldn't ascertain if it would work in theory.

 

I went back for my first shift and was oromptly called into the office again. This time I was told that I would need to ring the staff member who worked my opposite 7 shifts as she didn't want to work my weekends etc. I was told that my phased return would have to accomodate the hours she wanted to cover and my return would have to fit round this. I ended up doing 2 on 1 off and 2 on and my phased return being over 5 days instead if the 7 requested by the doctor.

 

I went into the laundry, no instructions had been placed on the wall and no help had been given by the night staff as requested.

 

I have since been forced to come off work again as not allowing adequate time between shifts and not being given any help and the day off between shifts not being covered properly which resulted in double work load on my return meant I overworked myself due to panic and fear if them thinking I couldn't do the job and ended up causing my shoulder to be to painful for a few days.

 

This is when I was advised by both my solicitor and the equality advice people that I would have to raise it as a grievance for failures to make reasonable adjustments. Which I have done.

 

My hearing is on Wednesday. The two staff members I had asked to accompany me have since told me they won't come in with me and my solicitor has been as much use as a chocolate tea pot. He's told me I have no choice but to go in unrepresented as I am not in a union. He's also told me they can't asses the strength of my case until they know the outcome of the meeting. I was basically advised to do this and have now been left to face the wolves alone.

 

I'm terrified and have spent the past 2 days in tears. I am thinking if just quitting and walking away because I honestly do not know what to do.

 

Quite long winded I apologise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phaitun

 

Yes the work place has a grievance procedure, I believe I have now followed what I am supposed to do. I tried and failed to sort this out informally. I have since then raised it as a formal grievance. No I am not in a union. I wasn't even aware I could join one until I read my response which said that I could take in someone from work or a trade union representative.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have done the right thing. Just keep calm and sit tight. Write down your requests asnd what actually happened to take with you.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

you could record the meeting covertly, it is best to go to it.

my employers did the same to me,

 

one meeting turned from a welfare meeting into a disciplinary type situation. there were no minutes taken in this meeting. the second meeting i asked for representation or a postponement for my rep to be present and they refused.

minutes were taken and have been provided to me. they mirror my complaint however are written in a way that seems they werenice.

 

the minutes have shown their discriminatory attitudes and provided further evidence of discrimination. it is important to have someone with you or record the meeting IMO

I am fighting it all the way :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

start to keep a chronological file of events, meetings, incidents etc as it seems they either do not know their statutory duties or are relying on you not knowing your rights!

 

keep records - they will become invaluable!

I am fighting it all the way :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Discovered recording can lead to sacking for breakdown of trust. Not a good idea to do it covertly.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, I agree with emmzzi (I didn't know it was sackable)

 

ask that it be recorded overtly for the sake of clarity as you really want to sort out the situation amicably however without representation from a union or work friend you are at a disadvantage. you want to be sure that your records provide a true account of your experiences with the employer

I am fighting it all the way :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have kept all correspondence to all meetings. Funnily enough I never received any minutes in response to the meeting I had relating to the first fit note in which they sent me home. Can I ask for this as she had a witness in there with her? At the time I didn't know it was going to turn into a meeting as I was just told to come in and have a "little chat"

 

Also the first letter I received was a letter inviting me in to see how they could aid me in my return to work. All the possible adjustments they could make we're in this letter but they didn't put in things I mentioned about staff bullying that had happened to me prior to going off for 28 weeks.

 

These included having laundry thrown at me, people ignoring me, refusing to move so I could get my trolley past them.

 

Just recently since my return I have also been ignored, been told by a staff member that she was told to stop talking to me and just yesterday I was told that I had been the topic of a staff room discussion relating to me never actually wanting to come back to work and that why would I when I can sit at home and get paid. Wouldn't mind but I haven't even been paid for hearl 4 months now.

 

My solicitor has advised me to bring this up also but I don't know if I should as the equality advice people and my solicitor advised me to write my grievance based in failure to make reasonable adjustments which i did.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep the bullying seperate and just focus on adjustments needed for now.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes that's what I thought. There's so much going on but to bring it all up I feel I would just lose sight of the most important bits which was their failure to help me come back to work. I was just going to take a copy of my grievance letter in with me and letters in which they have acknowledged my requests for adjustments. I believe I don't have to answer difficult or uncomfortable questions. They were given permission to view my medical records and never did.

 

I was just going to present those questions on my grievance to them again and then not say much more? All I ever wanted to do was return to work. I don't like it much but it's a job and its my independence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The one thing I am afraid of though is because its a small company the person conducting the meeting is the one that's failed to make the adjustments and the person that will conduct any appeal is her mum!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's a hard decision to make a stand against bullies, you will have moments of self doubt and uncertainty.

at the end of the day you are protected by law, it is important that you understand the law and how your case fits.

 

then you can make a decision as to whether it's worth fighting for

I am fighting it all the way :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it would be wise to deal with the questions on your grievance plus I would hand the chair of the meeting a typed formal request for reasonable adjustments.

 

let them know you have been recieving legal advice and that you are seeking a mutually acceptable solution,

 

you want to return to work

 

they are happy to have you back

 

between you it's the conditions of that work that nerd to be sorted.

In a polite manner point out that you have been advised that your requests are more than reasonable, point out the others who have an amended schedule due to disability or poor health

I am fighting it all the way :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, since Friday I have found out that even if I am not in a union as long as I can find someone who is an accredited union official and they would be willing to come in with me then this is acceptable during a grievance.

 

Found a union rep who is willing and able to come in with me but due to his own work commitments he cannot attend before 3.30 on any day. I put this in writing to my employer and explained this and asked if we could alter the time of my meeting from 10.30am to 4.30pm and also explained that several people from work had refused to come in with me due to feeling uncomfortable. I explained that if this time wasn't convenient then to leave me a voicemail or I could be reached via email or letter. I explained about his work commitments meaning any meeting old have to take place after 3.30 to allow for me to be accompanied.

 

Work leave me a message stating that the time is not suitable for them tomorrow or Thursday or Friday and that she has proposed a meeting next Wednesday at 10.30am.!! I honestly give up. I couldn't have made myself any clearer with regards to representation and times. They have failed to arrange a suitable time within 5 days if the original meeting as it states they are to try and do.

 

Where do I stand now?? I believe this is pushing me down the constructive dismissal route. I have lost my tax credits, I have not been paid for 3 months, I don't qualify for ssp anymore and I can't claim ESA because i am still classed as employed and apparently I haven't earnt enough national insurance contributions. I have a family to support and no idea how to do this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...