Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The 3 pieces of mortar that fell on the same day, at the same time, were approx. 25-30cm long and weighed around ½-1 kilo each from a roof that is above the 2nd floor; they were by no means tiny pieces of mortar but large chunks falling from a rather great height. I believe the size and weight is enough to cause serious injury and if it falls on your head, I assume it could potentially be lethal if unlucky, but we don't wish to put that theory to test... We can't in good conscience let a contractor install a patio and a gazebo as it is in the exact spot where the mortar fell, nor do I think anyone would be willing to take the chance. Looking at the roof, there are multiple other remaining pieces from the same 'line' or 'row' of mortar that can potentially fall. The mortar is right underneath the slate tiles on the neighbour's roof and I don't know whether the tiles are also (becoming) lose due to the loss of the mortar. I was trying to upload a photo but it seems it's not allowed. The first contractor to work in our garden in preparation for the patio and gazebo is scheduled to start on 10th June, that leaves the neighbour 5 workdays to sort their roof which is unlikely, so it seems we will have to postpone our patio contractor without knowing when they can come back. We have already had extensive work done in the garden in preparation for the wedding reception and it will become very costly for us if we have to move the wedding reception to a venue (if we can even get one at this short notice) rather than have it at home which was our dream.
    • Is this sufficiant for a letter of claim  ? Letter Of Claim       Reference: Techzone Mobile Phones Samsung A71 Mobile Phone £140 Purchase date 29. 5. 24     I the claimant purchased a 2nd hand Samsung A71 mobile from Techzone Mobile Phone unit 10 of the indoor market at the Potteries shopping centre. Initially the phone worked well until I used the camera and found debris in the camera lens spoiling pictures making it not fit for purpose. I contacted the seller who offered a replacement which I initially accepted but later rejected and wanted a refund in full which the seller refused saying they Do Not give refund is unlawful and goes against the Consumer rights act 2015. Therefore I intend to issue proceedings against you in a county court without further notice unless you reimburse me the above amount in Full within 7 days from the date of this Letter     ------------------------------------------    I think its best if i hand him the letter as posting it might not get through so can claim expenses traveling up there ?   or would it be best to just post and get 'Signed for'  ?   Should i also put in the letter of claim interest added or leave that till the Particulars letter ?
    • Ok thanks, I really need help with my mental health over this I’ve called 111 Hi sorry just one more thing can they contact my workplace?
    • Sorry to shatter your leftie dreams 🤣😂🤣😂     Donald Trump gets a SIX-POINT bump in approval after being found guilty on 34 counts according to snap Daily Mail poll: 'I think it was a waste of taxpayer money' WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK Teflon Don rides again, according to an exclusive poll for DailyMail.com which found that the guilty verdict in Manhattan... James Johnson, who conducted the poll, said Trump might be waking up as convicted felon but he was winning over the voters who matter.   Our snap poll of a representative sample of likely voters shows that for most Americans the trial has not changed their deep-set views of Trump,' he said.  'But amongst those who are open to changing their mind, people feel more positive by a margin of 6 points. That is outside of the margin of the error of the poll and we are saying that is significant. 'It extends to Independent voters too. Look at the explanations and it is clear why: people feel it was a politically motivated trial and view Trump as a "fighter" against what they see as injustice.     
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ?  Civil National Business Centre Northampton NN1 2LH Name of the Claimant ?  PRA Group UK Portfolios LTD   How many defendant's  joint or self ?  Just my self Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to.    24th May 2024   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total   Date of issue XX + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = XX + 14 days to submit defence = XX (33 days in total)  if your defence filing date falls on a W/End, you must file by friday @4PM     Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?  The claimant claims the sum of £22,000 for an outstanding debt owed. On 30/1/18 the defendant entered into n agreement with Lloyds Bank Plc for a bank loan under the reference 10017#######. On 4/1/19 the defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of £22,000. On 30/11/22 the debt of £22,000 assigned to PRA Group (UK) Limited, who itself assigned the debt to PRA Group UK Portfolios Ltd on 30/12/23. Notices of assignment were sent to the defendant in accordance with S136 Law of property act 1925. The claimant has instructed PRA Group (UK) Limited to act on its behalf in the recovery of the outstanding debt and to pursue litigation on its behalf. AND the claimant claims 1. The sum of £22,000. What is the total value of the claim?  £23,500 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ?  Yes Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No Did you inform the claimant of your change of address?  No - N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account?  Bank loan When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?  No Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ?  I believe it was done online on their app Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  Yes Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.  Debt was with halifax, whom passed the debt to PRA Group. Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Yes Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?  I'm not completely sure at it was nearly 6 years ago, I have done a CCA request and they have sent a screenshot of their system showing it was sent. Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  Yes Why did you cease payments?  Couldn't afford to make payments. What was the date of your last payment?  August 2018 Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?  No Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan?  No
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Repossession questioned by deeds not being signed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3747 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Just want to comment on the reference made to interest rate rises becoming a very real possibility. I know for sure that there are many, many people out there that are just about surviving. Any rise in interest rates even by a small amount would, I know, lead to an explosion in repossessions.

 

This is why I feel that this thread is tremendously important, and gives home owners in this situation some glimmer of hope.

 

MUTT1

 

I think having a glimmer of hope is certainly important.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Lender has 'gone away'..... who will take the Borrower to court?.....Are you saying that some unknown entity has the lawful right to do so.....some party who was never party to the original loan between the lender and the borrower?

 

Apple

 

In a securitisation structure, the lender never 'existed' in the first place. From the very start the lenders were dedicated special purpose entities with no employees and no assets apart from mortgages.

 

I imagine the mortgage administrator would take the borrower to court acting on behalf of the original lender, or on behalf of the entity to which the original lender has assigned its interest.

 

Generally speaking, debts may be freely assigned without the need to secure the consent of the borrower. The requirements for a legal assignment are set out in http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/15-16/20/section/136, which basically boil down to the assignor having to notify the borrower (there is also a concept of equitable assignment where the debt has been sold but no notice given to the borrower).

 

I don't want to derail this topic too much by talking about assignment, the key point is that a win in the Property Chamber is not necessarily the end of the matter so people need to be prepared for the long slog even if successful.

 

Perhaps you could tell me exactly (no you do not have to be physic) what would be my loan agreement in this instance.

 

The documents are what I actually received when I took out a mortgagelink3.gif with a lender that has become infamous on this site, documents that thousands of other borrowers would have received when taking out a mortgage.

 

1. Mortgage Application Form, signed by me and witnessed.

 

2. Declaration of Consent, signed by me.

 

3. Mortgage offer, no signaturelink3.gif required.

 

4. Re-Mortgage Declaration, signed by me and witnessed.

 

5. Mortgage Deed signed by me and witnessed.

 

6. Booklet Lending and Mortgage Conditions.

 

I'd say the loan agreement is all of 1, 2, 3 and 6. These are the documents setting out the terms on which the lender was prepared to offer you a loan, which you accepted by signing them and/or by borrowing money. I'd imagine document 1 refers to the other documents and says something along the lines of you accepting those documents by signing the application form, but this probably isn't strictly necessary so long as all documents were given to you at the time you took out the loan. I don't think there is any legal requirement for the lender to sign any of these documents in order for there to be an enforceable debt.

 

4 is a bit different because that relates to a re-mortgage which would be a separate agreement.

 

5 is a bit different because it is designed to secure the debt rather than set out the terms of the debt. Most of the discussion in this thread and certainly any Property Chamber application only directly concerns the validity of the security, which is document 5.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a fair question to put to a site team member of the CaG.....What do you suggest consumers do?

 

Well I wouldn't suggest they rely on untested arguments, sadly.

 

But, they could:

 

a) look at ways to maximise their income

b) ensure that they concentrate on meeting their priority debts - such as mortgage arrears, council tax, fuel etc.

c) if neccessary look at reduce their non-priority debts to the bare minimum; possibly even token payments

d) explore alternative accomodation where neccessary

 

I'm just not certain trying to argue defective deeds will work, though I would be delighted if it does.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apple hi

Lender has changed it registered address on 17/04/2012 to pw&c

I actually have copied what is very interesting information registered at companies house from 2006

 

What is a declaration of satisfaction in full or part of a mortgage charge/full/ charge8

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been checking out companies house and looking at the parties involved in my lenders dealings.

My lender according to companies house has 19 mortgages 2 outstanding and 17 satisfied.

The SPV who apparently purchased or pooled my mortgage has only 2 outstanding mortgages

The SP who is the trustee had 8 mortgages 2 outstanding.

Does anyone one know what this means are the mortgages pooled so hundreds in them or are they as they say just 2 or 8 mortgages

 

These not mortgages or debts of the underlying borrowers. They are charges granted by the entity which registered them, and not necessarily over land.

 

In the case of the SPV, it will have granted a charge over all of its assets in favour of the trustee (the trustee acts on behalf of the investors, to ensure money flows from the SPV to the investors). I imagine the 2 outstanding charges are a specific charge over the right to receive loan repayments and a general floating charge of all the SPV's assets. If the SPV defaults on its obligations the trustee can use these charges to take control of the SPV.

 

In the case of the trustee or the lender, the registered charges could be anything - security over their property, over shares they own, over their right to receive repayment of debts and so on.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

SEQUENCI,

well your reply does not answer the question yet again.

 

I asked if andrew1 posts was correct here it is again

 

Apart from the request to send your e-mail address to applecart. This will not happen...we do not pass member's details on to anyone.

With the greatest of respect, that is not true. CAGicon passed all the details of posters, (including their email addresses) who were investigating and chasing Cabot to their then Chief executive Ken Maynard when he threatened legal action against the site six weeks before telling the individuals concerned they had done so.

 

Whilst recognising that the site is bigger than any one group of poster and legal positions must be protected, it did not make for good relations with those posters who had contributed a significant amount of assistance to fellow caggers en route and they left the site.

 

CAGicon do when cornered and I could see a very heavy resistance building by lenders against the general theme of this discussion here and whilst there is no specific named company target as there was with Cabot and what we were all doing against them, Cag none the less have form for disclosure. Sorry, just ask BankFodder.

 

So there you have it,

Why do I ask,

You keep on at apple for their help in this matter which has done its job, more than the last ones I may add.

There seems to be a one sided attack against what ever apple states yet I have seen NONE addressed to BEN s posts why??

 

If we are wrong in January as Ben said then its up to US what happens or where it goes to then BUT believe me it will NOT end in January.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apple hi

Lender has changed it registered address on 17/04/2012 to pw&c

I actually have copied what is very interesting information registered at companies house from 2006

 

What is a declaration of satisfaction in full or part of a mortgage charge/full/ charge8

Also DECLARATION THAT PART OF THE PROPERTY/UNDERTAKING :RELEASED/CEASED/PART/CHARGE 16. What does this mean

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I have just had my letter from the property chamber.

 

Well, it says that a possession order was made in a case and the tribunal has given notice to strike out the application on the basis that it is an abuse of process to litigate the validity of the charge proceeding before the tribunal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you mean the possession order is struck out or your application ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

SEQUENCI,

well your reply does not answer the question yet again.

 

I asked if andrew1 posts was correct here it is again

 

Apart from the request to send your e-mail address to applecart. This will not happen...we do not pass member's details on to anyone.

With the greatest of respect, that is not true. CAGicon passed all the details of posters, (including their email addresses) who were investigating and chasing Cabot to their then Chief executive Ken Maynard when he threatened legal action against the site six weeks before telling the individuals concerned they had done so.

 

Whilst recognising that the site is bigger than any one group of poster and legal positions must be protected, it did not make for good relations with those posters who had contributed a significant amount of assistance to fellow caggers en route and they left the site.

 

CAGicon do when cornered and I could see a very heavy resistance building by lenders against the general theme of this discussion here and whilst there is no specific named company target as there was with Cabot and what we were all doing against them, Cag none the less have form for disclosure. Sorry, just ask BankFodder.

 

So there you have it,

Why do I ask,

You keep on at apple for their help in this matter which has done its job, more than the last ones I may add.

There seems to be a one sided attack against what ever apple states yet I have seen NONE addressed to BEN s posts why??

 

If we are wrong in January as Ben said then its up to US what happens or where it goes to then BUT believe me it will NOT end in January.

 

I'm still none the wiser, apologies. What is the precise question which you wish to ask?

 

There seems to be a one sided attack against what ever apple states yet I have seen NONE addressed to BEN s posts why?

 

Because Ben's views generally reinforce what I was taught at Law School and my subsequent training in mortgages and legal practice. If I come across anything that I would like further clarifcation on then I'll ask.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ALISONO,

er sorry I don't under stand this post,

you sent an application into the chamber, questioning the deed

your application before the chamber has noting to do with the case of possession order,

ITS WEATHER THE LAW HAS BEEN FOLLOWED

can you paste up the reply?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neither at the moment I actually informed the property chamber on the 21st October and the solicitors informed them on the 24th.

The solicitors have asked a few questions saying the property chamber does not have the power to grant what we have asked for in the application that the property chamber has restrictions

On being able to grant declarations. They ask 4 questions on what it appears I am asking to do and the property chamber phase said its point 2 which rectify the registry by removal of said lender

Need to read it in more depth and think of my response back to the property chamber as I applied to them before I net to my first hearing.

Also think the solicitors have jumped the gun as the county court don't say my bring next week so about possession it what I have entered into a defences Nd submitted to property chamber

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm still none the wiser, apologies. What is the precise question which you wish to ask?

 

Is that post true or not??

 

I believe it is although I wasn't party to the events, so I'm unsure as to the precise circumstances. What's important to bear in mind (and sorry for going off topic) is that there can be instances where disclosure of information is unavoidable. Although it's a wiki page this will fill you in: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwich_Pharmacal_Order

 

This case is also really important: Smith v ADVFN PLC

 

We all need to be very careful as to what we post (and publish) on internet forums - especailly here in the UK with our ridiculous libel laws.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok:

IS IT ME I am wanting to do this discreetly so do I ask the CAG team to let me post to them so they can forward to you?

 

Alison, are you wanting to email something to a Site team Member, for documents to be forwarded to IsitMe ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

OMG I don't believe what the solicitors have put into the letter to the tribunal.

 

They have said that the District judge declined to make an order to make the defendants continue to making their mortgage payments in the interim period and even suggested they might stop their payments .... OMG THIS IS A BLATANT LIE THE JUDGE NEVER SAID THAT ALL .

 

I AM GOING TO WRITE THEM NOW AND ALSO GOING TO RING THEM UP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

steampowered,

 

You keep referring to the "loan agreement" in a number of your posts, suggesting that all of us with a mortgage must have a loan agreement.

 

Perhaps you could tell me exactly (no you do not have to be physic) what would be my loan agreement in this instance.

 

The documents are what I actually received when I took out a mortgage with a lender that has become infamous on this site, documents that thousands of other borrowers would have received when taking out a mortgage.

 

1. Mortgage Application Form, signed by me and witnessed.

 

2. Declaration of Consent, signed by me.

 

3. Mortgage offer, no signature required.

 

4. Re-Mortgage Declaration, signed by me and witnessed.

 

5. Mortgage Deed signed by me and witnessed.

 

6. Booklet Lending and Mortgage Conditions.

 

There you have it, all documents relating to this particular lender (bet other caggers know which one). Not one document signed by the lender.

 

Now, what I want to know, and this is something that my current lender and past lenders seem extremley reluctant to answer, what constitutes to be my loan agreement.

 

Would it be No. 1? Don't think so. Would it be No.2? Don't think so, or perhaps No. 3? Again, don't think so. What about No. 4? No, well No. 5 Then?

 

Or could it be No. 6 the Mortgage Deed that contains the reference to the "Mortgage Conditions"?

 

I really can't understand why I have had no responses to my numerous attempts to get what I consider to be a very simple and straightforward answer. If I have/had a loan agreement, then where is it?

 

It is also interesting that, unlike some other posters on this thread, my letters have never been returned or have received anything with lender gone away so, I really do not see why there is any reason for the lenders in this particular instance not to respond. Unless of course, there never was a legally executed loan agreement.

 

Oh, and by the way, I think this post is highly relevant to this thread.

 

MUTT1

 

Hi Mutt1,

 

Well I have a signed application form and the mortgage was done via a broker (not witnessed and no lenders signature), a mortgage offer not signed by either or any party (which was revised and came the day before completion), and a Deed signed and witnessed by me and OH but no lenders signature on anything whatsoever. I asked both original lender and admin

on behalf of the new 'lender' as securitised, and they refer me to the Deed as the answer, as it refers to the mortgage conditions and on signing I and OH are apparently bound to the terms and conditions of the Mortgage Offer on signing the Deed!

 

Oo just saw a flying piglet!

 

So there is no contract only their - let's make the Deed into a loan agreement/contract stance too - perhaps Lenders are conscious of being environmentally friendly and wanted to save paper lol! ;-)

 

There is no lawful logic - as I have said before if the Deed is masquerading as the underlying Loan Agreement/Contract too then where is the Lender's signature then?

 

There was also the question of how can the administration company for the SPV do everything as though they are the Lender? Power of Attorney (Lender SPV to Administration Co) was their reply? However there is still the further ruse that the SPV is the Lender/owner as in actual reality, the Administtration Co is acting on behalf of the Special Purpose Vehicle SPV (Lender) or Pretender lender as they cannot be FCA regulated and the SPV is acting on behalf of the investors who they sold the rights to the contractual payments to.

 

Steampowered? RESTITUTION? I cannot see court after court saying that's ok Mr Lender silly you forgetting to sign those pesky Deeds and the Loan Agreement was eaten by your dog so you forgot to ask your Borrowers to sign, never mind Mr Borrower, it was a silly mistake and you need to dance to Mr Lender's tune? Really? I just can't see it just because they would want and need it? AND you are forgetting Steampowered, what detriment has the pretender Lender suffered as they had their 'money' back after securitising. So if they claimed a loss then under restitution - where would that leave them then?

 

WP

Link to post
Share on other sites

CITIZENB Yes please I want to scan something to IS IT ME only

 

Ok, I will provide you with an email address by private message.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3747 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...