Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Egg Barclaycard Marlin Citation Received


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4047 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Advise required please.

 

I have just received a citation from a Scottish Solicitor representing Marlin Capital Europe Ltd in respect of a debt to Barclaycard.

 

I have never had a Barclaycard Credit Card or took out an agreement with them.

 

I did have a credit card with Egglink3.gif which I took out in 2004.

 

I now know that Barclaycard took over Egg Credit Card accounts in 2011.

 

I was making regular payments to Egg until they suddenly stopped sending me statements,

and so I then stopped making payments.

 

I never received any further statements or correspondence from Egg for 18 months,

then all of a sudden in early 2011 I received a default notice.

 

I was unaware that Egg transferred to Barclaycard, possibly I received notification, but I cannot remember.

 

I then started receiving calls from Marlin regarding Barclaycard.

 

I informed them that I have never had a Barclaycard and refused to discuss matters with them.

 

I have now received a writ from their Scottish Solicitors giving me 21 days to respond.

 

I am based in Scotland.

 

Interestingly in the writ it is stated that I took out an agreement with Barclaycard in 2004,

this is an error straight away as it was with Egg.

 

I do not know when I made the last payment to Egg, it was about 4 or 5 years ago and maybe time barredlink3.gif.

 

Should I send a CCA request to the Solicitors or Marlin or both?

 

Is there still time to do so?

 

Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?390657-Scottish-Court-Citation-received-marlin-on-very-old-Egg-debt&p=4227394#post4227394

get that CCa off RD tomorrow

 

get an SAR off to BC too RD

 

what does your CRA file say about this debt?

 

see below

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA requests going out to Barclaycard, Marlin and Marlin's Solicitors tomorrow.

 

Discovered that last payment on the account was made 4 years ago, whilst still Egg, therefore not time barred. :-(

 

Equifax CRA shows the account as settled in Feb. 2011 and no further records.

 

Experian has records up to present, with the status as 'default' and balance as 'satisfied'. Default date of Jan. 2011 and debt assigned to CAIS member in Feb. 2013. What is a CAIS member?

 

What is a SAR request, is it different from a CCA request?

Link to post
Share on other sites

SAR asks them for all info they hold on you and should be made to the original creditor.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

SAR asks them for all info they hold on you and should be made to the original creditor.

 

Would that be Egg then or Barclaycard saying as they took over the Egg Accounts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barclays i think.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

However, egg states:

 

If your card was closed before November 2011 or was not transferred to Barclaycard, please contact Canada Square Operations (formerly known as Egg Banking plc) at the following address:

 

Canada Square Operations

PO Box 4903

Worthing

BN99 3AR

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

dunno we'd need to see it

 

sounds real.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There have been a number of such citations sent out on the back of B/C taking on Egg accounts and then passing them on to Marlin, normally to people who have ignored the usual marlin claims and demands and not responded with a CCA or even a prove it letter, I thought that under the Scottish system all claimants must have possession of the original agreement before bringing such a claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a citation, I have 21 days to decide if I am doing to defend or capitulate.

 

If I defend, which I will do, then the ball is back in Marlins court. Do they go to court or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

not when they have no cards to play.

 

defend all

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...