Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

M&S, changed from Storecard to Creditcard .


ajs444
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3756 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

So, in a quandry what to do, any suggestions would be welcome.

M&S just issuing monthly statements, adding interest, haven't paid them since Nov/Dec last year, everything ust flowing along.

I really want to get them out my life and cleared, how do I do this?

They are not taking me to court, "seriously fed up" and "Beetles" victories will have given them second thoughts.

Anybody with any ideas?

has anyone tried offering them a token settlement??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 178
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Send them this:-

 

 

Account Number..........

 

Request for a True Original Copy of Signed Credit Agreement under Sections 77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

Account in Dispute

 

I wrote to you on xxxxxxxxx 2009 requesting a true, signed original copy of any credit agreement that exists in relation to the above account. This was a legal request for information under Sections 77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. The statutory fee of £1.00 was enclosed with my original request.

 

The Consumer Credit Act 1974 and Agreement Regulations1883 are very specific as to the form and content of a regulated agreement and the Application form you have provided to date falls short of what is required.

 

Under the terms of the above ‘Act’, if a creditor has not complied within 12 working days of receipt of this request the creditor is in default, rendering the alleged agreement unenforceable until the request is fully complied with, or by a court order.

 

Both of these deadlines have now passed and due to the non-compliant reply in relation to the above request you have not discharged your obligations under the ‘Act’, and remain in default.

 

On advice from the Financial Ombudsman Service, I now require you to reply with your final response to comply fully with my previous request. The maximum timescale for you to give a final response to my complaint is 8 weeks. This time runs from the date of the original complaint, which in this case, is the date you received my original request on xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,

56 days from this date will expire on xxxxxxxxxx 2009.

 

Should your final response not comply with all statutory regulations and pertinent sections of the ‘Act’, and be a true signed original copy of the alleged executed agreement – I will be left to surmise that no regulated enforceable agreement exists between us, and will ask the Ombudsman to instigate their investigation.

 

 

Whilst this account is in dispute, and remains in default – I should remind you that you may:-

•Not demand any payment on this account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

•Not add any further interest or charges to this account.

•Not disclose or pass on this account to any other party/agent.

•Not register any adverse payment history regarding this account with any Credit Reference Agency.

•Not issue a default notice related to this account.

 

 

Be advised, the Consumer Credit Act 1974/2006 makes very clear that, a default may only be issued for breach of a regulated valid agreement. Further, that disclosure under the Data Protection Act is not, and can not be processed without express consent. This consent is expressly withdrawn until such time as a true copy of the alleged executed credit agreement is provided. As no such properly executed, enforceable agreement has yet been proven to exist, any attempt at serving default, or disclosure of my data to any third party, will have no legal standing, and will be vehemently challenged.

 

I await your final response to this complaint within 14 days of this letter, and would ask you include your proposed actions in the event that you are unable to comply fully with this final request.

 

Yours faithfully

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello ajs444!

 

Just a quick on on waterminx's images above.

 

The Terms page whilst clearly a different scan, seem to have 90 towards the bottom right...1990?

 

Also, the Postal Mark seems to have...2/7/19..?

 

Also, the Postal Mark seems to have the Post Town "B A S I N G S T O K E" across the top, but it's hard to read and that is mainly an impression from the basic shape of the text.

 

Really hard to read, but the date does not appear to be anywhere near August. :eek:

 

Looks like M&S have grabbed the nearest page of Terms they could be bothered to find...as usual.

 

Cheers,

BRW

Edited by banker_rhymes_with
Added BASINGSTOKE
Link to post
Share on other sites

OMG - 'Banker' !!! I think you are right - on closer inspection I dont think the second page IS a copy of the reverse of the form. I cannot read the postmark properly at all but - there is DEFINITELY something very wrong with this photo copy.

 

Thankyou - all - so much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OMG - 'Banker' !!! I think you are right - on closer inspection I dont think the second page IS a copy of the reverse of the form. I cannot read the postmark properly at all but - there is DEFINITELY something very wrong with this photo copy.

 

Thankyou - all - so much.

Hello - I have received EXACTLY the same document - same "90" - postmark and three faint lines at side - also cropped at the top left.

check out my thread - just sent Rockwell DCA packing after revealing this

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/data-protection-default-issues/168827-m-money-5.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread has now been moved to the newly opened M&S Forum:D

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh well, now had nice letter from Debt Collectors called CD from Leeds, will have to write to them to say they are barking up the wrong tree!!

 

Hello Ajs444

 

MMMmmmhhh M&S seem to be favouring this lot of late, MMMMmmhh or is it the others are giving them a wide berth;)

 

Personally, I would be inclined to reel them in a bit, maybe harass you a while, log all telephone calls, file all threatening letterss etc good grounds for a harassment complaint.

 

few breaches under the dpa etc and a whole load more to add to your case.

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having sent, "Account in serious dispute letter" last week, I had a reply from M&S today, saying they are investigating my complaint.

Appears one half does not know what the other half are doing!!!

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well follow on from previous M&S, dated 1st September.

Account no longer in dispute acccording to M&S, due to decision by OFT on my case, they said it would be down to the Courts to decide legality.

I take it the DCA is getting landed with this honour??

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well follow on from previous M&S, dated 1st September.

Account no longer in dispute acccording to M&S, due to decision by OFT on my case, they said it would be down to the Courts to decide legality.

I take it the DCA is getting landed with this honour??

 

Sorry, what decision by the OFT ? Have they said the agreement is valid ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...