Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My understanding is that they won't provide the name to me whether the investigation is Live or Closed, & I have no legal rep as I didn't have P.I. Cover on my policy, & am intending to claim using OIC.org.uk, but remain completely stuck as they 100% cannot open a claim on the portal without both the Reg. No. & Name of the other driver.  
    • thanks again ftmdave, your words are verey encouraging and i do appreciate them. i have taken about 2 hours to think of a letter to write to the ceo...i will paste it below...also how would i address a ceo? do i just put his name? or put dear sir? do you think its ok?  i would appreciate feedback/input from anybody if anything needs to be added/taken away, removed if incorrect etc. i am writing it on behalf of my friend..she is the named driver  - im the one with the blue badge and owner of the car - just for clarification. thanks in adavance to everyone.       My friend and I are both disabled and have been a victim of disability discrimination on the part of your agents.   I have been incorrectly 'charged' by your agent 'excel parking' for overstaying in your car park, but there was no overstay. The letter I recieved said the duration of stay was 15 minutes but there is a 10 minute grace period and also 5 minutes consideration time, hence there was no duration of stay of 15 minutes.   I would like to take this oppertunity to clarify what happend at your Gravesend store. We are struggling finacially due to the 'cost of living crisis' and not being able to work because we are both disabled, we was attracted to your store for the 10 items for £10 offer. I suffer dyslexia and depression and my friend who I take shopping has a mobility disability. We went to buy some shopping at your Gravesend branch of Iceland on 28th of December 2023, we entered your car park, tried to read and understand the parking signs and realised we had to pay for parking. We then realised we didnt have any change for the parking machine so went back to look for coins in the car and when we couldnt find any we left. As my friend has mobility issues it takes some time for me to help him out of the car, as you probably understand this takes more time than it would a normal able bodied person. As I suffer dyslexia I am sure you'll agree that it took me more time than a normal person to read and understand the large amount of information at the pay & display machine. After this, it took more time than an able bodied person to leave the car park especially as I have to help my friend on his crutches etc get back into the car due to his mobility disability. All this took us 15 minutes.   I was the driver of my friends car and he has a blue badge. He then received a 'notice to keeper' for a 'failure to purchase a parking tariff'. On the letter it asked to name the driver if you wasnt the driver at the time, so as he wasnt the driver he named me. I appealed the charge and told them we are disabled and explained the situation as above. The appeal was denied, and even more so was totally ignored regarding our disabilities and that we take longer than an able bodied person to access the car and read the signs and understand them. As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us. I cannot afford any unfair charges of this kind as I am severely struggling financially. I cannot work and am a carer for my disabled Son who also has a mental and mobility disability. I obviously do not have any disposable income and am in debt with my bills. So its an absolute impossibility for me to pay this incorrect charge.     After being discriminated by your agent my friend decided to contact 'iceland customer care team' on my behalf and again explained the situation and also sent photos of his disabled blue badge and proof of disability. He asked the care team to cancel the charge as ultimately its Iceland's land/property and you have the power over excel parking to cancel it. Again we was met with no mention or consideration for our disability and no direct response regarding the cancellation, all we was told was to contact excel parking. He has replied over 20 times to try to get the 'care team' to understand and cancel this but its pointless as we are just ignored every time. I believe that Ignoring our disability is discrimination which is why I am now contacting you.     I have noticed on your website that you are 'acting' to ease the 'cost of living crisis' : https://about.iceland.co.uk/2022/04/05/iceland-acts-to-ease-the-cost-of-living-crisis/   If you really are commited to helping people in this time of crisis ..and especially two struggling disabled people, can you please cancel this charge as it will only cause more damage to our mental health if you do not.  
    • I've also been in touch via the online portal to the Police's GDPR team, to request the name of the other Driver. Got this response:   Dear Mr. ---------   Our Ref: ----------   Thank you for your request which has been forwarded to the Data Protection Team for consideration.   The data you are requesting is third party, we would not give this information directly to you.   Your solicitor or legal team acting on our behalf would approach us directly with your signed (wet) consent allowing us to consider the request further.   I note the investigation is showing as ‘live’ at this time, we would not considered sharing data for suggested injury until the investigation has been closed.   If you wish to pursue a claim once the investigation has been closed please signpost your legal team to [email protected]   Kind regards   ----------------- Data Protection Assistant    
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Hi everyone, Apologies for bringing up the same topic regarding these individuals. I wish I had found this forum earlier, as I've seen very similar cases. However, I need your help in figuring out what to do next because we've involved our partners/resellers. I work as an IT Manager in a company outside of the UK. We acquired a license from a certified reseller (along with a support agreement) and also obtained training sessions from them. The issue arose when we needed to register two people for the training sessions, so we used an external laptop for the second user to keep up with the sessions for only a month. During this period, the laptop was solely used for the training sessions. After two weeks, my boss forwarded an email to me from Ms Vinces, stating that we are using illicit software from SolidWorks. Since this has never happened to me or anyone we know, I went into panic mode and had a meeting with her. During the meeting, we explained that we were using an external laptop solely for the training sessions and that the laptop had not been used within the company since her email. She informed us that for such cases, there are demos and special licenses (though our reseller did not mention these types of licenses when we made our initial purchase). She then mentioned that we had utilized products worth approximately €25k and presented us with two options: either pay the agreed value or acquire SolidWorks products. We expressed that the cost was too high, and our business couldn't support such expenses. I assured her that we would discuss the matter with the company board and get back to her. After the meeting, we contacted the company reseller from whom we purchased the license, explained the situation, and mentioned the use of an external laptop. They said they would speak to Maria and help mediate the situation. We hoped to significantly reduce the cost, perhaps to that of a 1-year professional license. Unfortunately, we were mistaken. The reseller mediated a value €2k less than what Maria had suggested (essentially, we would need to acquire two professional lifetime licenses and two years of support for a total of €23k). This amount is still beyond our means, but they insisted that the price was non-negotiable and wouldn't be reduced any further. The entire situation feels odd because she never provided us with addresses or other evidence (which I should have requested), and she's pressuring us to resolve the matter by the end of the month, with payment to be made through the reseller. This makes me feel as though the reseller is taking advantage of the situation to profit from it. Currently, we're trying to buy some time. We plan to meet with the reseller next week but are uncertain about how to proceed with them or whether we should respond to the mediator.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

T-Mobile price increase _Cancel contract


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3914 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

it is now confirmed T Mobile have blacklisted my two mobile phones, even though i purchased them as sim free open to all networks

 

its not the number they have blocked its the IMEI number, if i put my sim into another phone it works fine

 

so i have had to order another two phone to replace the two blocked as they say it could take a month to sort it out

 

not happy

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

it is now confirmed T Mobile have blacklisted my two mobile phones, even though i purchased them as sim free open to all networks

 

its not the number they have blocked its the IMEI number, if i put my sim into another phone it works fine

 

so i have had to order another two phone to replace the two blocked as they say it could take a month to sort it out

 

not happy

 

How are they allowed to block the IMEI - Who will pay for the replacement mobiles and if you don't mind, what is the combined cost of the mobiles?

Link to post
Share on other sites

£525

 

i have been told it will be investigated, i have had to send in the recipt for the phones by post to prove they are mine.

 

funny how today i got the final bill and today they are blocked

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

i know its very petty what they have done but i have sent them a nasty letter listing my costs to date to replace the phones compensation for lack of use and my time i have charged at £90 per hour so they now owe me more than i owe them

 

should it go to court i will counter claim with the amount, or if it doesnt i will take them to court for it

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

this was posted on MSE a very interesting email

 

"Thank you for your email.The written notice that was issued in early April 2013 was sent without knowledge of what the actual March RPI figure would be until published on 16 April 2013, however, this increase in charges is not an increase above the published month March RPI figure of 3.3% and does not give the customer a right to cancel. This was a risk that we took as a business as to what figure would be published on 16 April 2013 but that was our risk to take as a business and does not give the customer the right to cancel. As a business we anticipated the RPI figure for March, if it had been lower than expected customers would have been entitled to cancel their contracts but as this is not the case, cancellation of your contract without penalty is declined.As you have reached the end of our escalation process, if you wish to take this matter further you will need to seek external advice.Yours sincerelyJonathan BaillieExecutive Office, EE"

 

has anyone else had a response from the letters sent, i know i havent except for the problems with blacklisted phone

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd already come to the conclusion that for my pre-October contract it was too high risk to pursue a Cancellation due to an increase in excessive of RPI. I feel T-Mobile would win in Court with such a Rationale. ie. there's nothing to stop them using Mystic Meg for determining a suitable figure should they choose, as long as it is not in excess of the RPI for the 12 months prior to the Written Notice.

 

Should they use that Rationale then I'd expect their Shareholders to vote them off the Board since they are taking a 50:50 gamble on a very large loss for a very small gain (0.1%) and if I were a Shareholder I wouldn't feel that that is the sort of Financial Management I was looking for.

 

I do feel that anyone that Cancelled before 16.04 would likely win their dispute since T-Mobile made it that Time was of the Essence in relation to the Cancellation stating it should be immediate.

 

I'm still perusing Cancellation for my post-October Contract where I feel there is no risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd already come to the conclusion that for my pre-October contract it was too high risk to pursue a Cancellation due to an increase in excessive of RPI. I feel T-Mobile would win in Court with such a Rationale. ie. there's nothing to stop them using Mystic Meg for determining a suitable figure should they choose, as long as it is not in excess of the RPI for the 12 months prior to the Written Notice.

 

Should they use that Rationale then I'd expect their Shareholders to vote them off the Board since they are taking a 50:50 gamble on a very large loss for a very small gain (0.1%) and if I were a Shareholder I wouldn't feel that that is the sort of Financial Management I was looking for.

 

I do feel that anyone that Cancelled before 16.04 would likely win their dispute since T-Mobile made it that Time was of the Essence in relation to the Cancellation stating it should be immediate.

 

I'm still perusing Cancellation for my post-October Contract where I feel there is no risk.

 

i agree to try and cancel now could be risky i did cancel before the 16th so i will fight them if it comes to it.

 

I see the press are now looking into it so anything might happen but to admit to it being a guess cant stand up in court the facts are the fig they quoted was not correct at the time it was posted.

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

just recived this email from Which

 

Hello ****,

 

Many thanks for your email about T-Mobile and first of all please accept my apologies for the delay in responding.

 

1000's of consumers have contacted us in relation to this and because of this feedback, Which? started a Campaign, called "Fixed Means Fixed", you may wish to look at this here:-

 

http://www.which.co.uk/campaigns/technology/fixed-means-fixed/

 

Meanwhile, I have recorded your comments on our consumer feedback database. Feedback (good or bad) helps us understand the problems and issues consumers face. They are also helpful with research and testing. We rely on your opinion to continue publishing relevant and helpful information and I will make sure that your comments are passed on to our researchers. Of course, if they need further information or help from you they will be in direct contact.

 

Thank you for sharing this with me and if there is anything else you wish to share, please do so at any time by email. Alternatively, you can call our Customer Services Department on 01992 822800 (Monday-Friday 8.30am-6pm and Saturday 9am-1pm).

 

On a last note, as we record all forms of contact from members (and I am unable to locate a membership through your email address), if you could quote your membership number in future I would be grateful.

 

Regards,

 

 

 

 

Ann Bartlett

Service Support Adviser

Which"

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

just one point

 

somewhere in the back of my mind (vast and empty most of the time) i remember getting an email off T mobile that the terms and conditions were changing with a link to the new ones, got to be honest i cant find a copy of it but wouldn't that mean we are all on post Octobers T&C

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

still havent had a reply from my last two letters

 

i have

 

used the pac code

 

they have sent a final bill showing the cancelation charge

they have blacklisted the last two phone i used on the system even though they are sim free open phones, they say they are lost or stolen

 

i have counterd in a letter for the cost of the phones

 

so up to now i am in limbo waiting for them to make the next move

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

still no news from TM but MSE forum has gone to town with it contacting the press ect.

 

recommend any one to read tup on that forum to see what to do about cancelling.

 

you must start the cancellation today its your last chance

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

TM have until the end of the month to respond to my claim for compensation for bricking the last two phones

 

as of today i still haven't had a response to any letter sent even the recorded ones sent in April so the next will be the letter before action

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have won

 

received a letter from EE today admitting to blocking my IMEI numbers

 

offering compensation payment in full for the replacement phones as well as clearing the cancellation of the contract. so i am free and clear of TM the two phones they blocked are now working OK so can be sold.

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, how it was worded it was a good will gesture

 

i think they knew if i took it to court for blocking my phones they would loose so they combined it all together

 

its typical a good will gesture is the bog standard cop out of guilt

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still, a win is a win. Well done. I was starting to worry about how big a fight this was gonna prove for ya with the default issue Etc.

 

Congrats.

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

many thanks

 

but i think the only reason i have won is they blacklisted as stolen my personal telephones then denied doing it, but with the letter i had from my new suppier proving they did it, they were going to loose the fight, much more simple to give in and i will go away

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

If it is of any interest to people here, I have just had a decision from Cicas the adjudication scheme in my favour. I had renewed my contract for 24 months in Nov and got the price increase letter in April. I won because the adjudicator decided that my "price plan" was the price I had negotiated and not the double notional price that TM thought it was (with "loyalty discount"). Therefore if you have a "discount" and have tried to cancel you will almost certainly win via cisas. THe adjudicator was also "mindful" of the 3.2/3.3% business, so I think this may work.

However all this cost t-Mobile is a customer leaving. It would be good if someone took them through the courts so they would have to pay costs.

 

If anyone is interested I have the detailed decision which I can email if you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is of any interest to people here, I have just had a decision from Cicas the adjudication scheme in my favour. I had renewed my contract for 24 months in Nov and got the price increase letter in April. I won because the adjudicator decided that my "price plan" was the price I had negotiated and not the double notional price that TM thought it was (with "loyalty discount"). Therefore if you have a "discount" and have tried to cancel you will almost certainly win via cisas. THe adjudicator was also "mindful" of the 3.2/3.3% business, so I think this may work.

However all this cost t-Mobile is a customer leaving. It would be good if someone took them through the courts so they would have to pay costs.

 

If anyone is interested I have the detailed decision which I can email if you wish.

 

 

Thanks for posting this. I had posted on the MSE thread a link to what I assume is your case being discussed on You and Yours.

 

There may be some more people over there interested in the detail so I'll update that post to include a link back to here (if it works)

 

http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?p=62921305#post62921305

(Post #2046)

Edited by Ian2012
Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is of any interest to people here, I have just had a decision from Cicas the adjudication scheme in my favour. I had renewed my contract for 24 months in Nov and got the price increase letter in April. I won because the adjudicator decided that my "price plan" was the price I had negotiated and not the double notional price that TM thought it was (with "loyalty discount"). Therefore if you have a "discount" and have tried to cancel you will almost certainly win via cisas. THe adjudicator was also "mindful" of the 3.2/3.3% business, so I think this may work.

However all this cost t-Mobile is a customer leaving. It would be good if someone took them through the courts so they would have to pay costs.

 

If anyone is interested I have the detailed decision which I can email if you wish.

 

I have taken T-Mobile to small claims as they did not replied for my cancellation letter for two months (even when I was sending reminders) and when I had sent 3rd reminder they refused to cancel the contract. I have supported my claim in 2 ways - first of all 3.2% vs. 3.3% - in their reply they mentioned they use the factor published as closely as possible before the date they send the letters (so 3.2% should be effective) and the fact that I received notification after 15th April so less than 30 days before the changes went live. When asked for a proof of delivery etc. there were unable to provide it.

 

I have tried to send you PM @smewing but I have not enough posts :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...