Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

on line creditcard agreementMBNA - link chasing me


Bob G
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4066 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is my first post on a forum thank you for taking the time to read it,

 

I was sent a hardly readable copy of an online credit card agreement from Link Financial

with my name and address and a tick in the agreement box dated 01 April 2008,

 

at no time have I ever received any other agreement from the original credit card company MBNA that I have signed.

 

I am contesting this agreement that there was no follow up paperwork.

 

Also how can Link Financial claim I owe them the money when my original agreement was with MBNA?

 

Maybe someone can explain the relevant laws etc.

have been told that in the States they would have no legal powers,

is that the same here.

Thanks

Bob

:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi BG

 

never ever trust anything link say or do

they are out to fleece you

 

what does you cra file say about this debt?

 

see below

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Welcome to CAG.

What occurs under US law wont help here.

1. Online apps the tick box is accepted as a signature.

 

You need to make a CCA request under section 77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 to get a copy of the agreement from Link.

Ues the template letter from the CAG library. There is £1 statutory fee and Link have 12 + 2 working days to comply.

 

Are link acting on behalf of MBNA or has the debt been sold, if it has been sold then it is the ''whole agreement'' that has been aquired and that's how you now owe a third party.

 

When was this agreement started? When did you last make payment or written acknowledgment of the debt?

  • Confused 1

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

As the brigadier says the fact it is 2008 means a tick box is fine for a signature and once they have provided an agreement it will be enforceable.

I suspect that link have bought the debt but that is something you need to check.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

The last payment made was October 2011;

 

Link bought the debt 29 August 2012. I

 

have already done the above with MBNA and also with link and on both occasions their replies were outside the statutory 12+2 days.

 

At no time was I ever provided with the original terms and conditions, only an up to date one by MBNA.

 

Link has only provided the ticked agreement.

 

Would it be helpful if i typed acopy of the agreement Lonk have sent me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

get your cra file

 

see below

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why do you think you need to pay link ?

 

let get the facts of how the industry see your debts.

 

for a start it will show if link do own the debt

 

and if they are trashing your file.

 

with link you need all the facts

 

and NOT believe anything they say or write

 

wanna know where all the money goes when people pay link...

 

http://www.homesandproperty.co.uk/property_news/news/millionairedebtcollectordigsdeepinsouthkensington.html

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok bob

 

what is the default date and the opening date

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

do the figures match with links demands too

 

looks likeyour going to be relying upon PPI or penalty charges here

 

got all the statements from MBNA?

 

dont think you can argue on the agreement side

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The agreement will be pretty much cast iron enforceable. As dx saysmaybe you have Ppi.

 

I have an online app from amex dated 2006. Luckily for me it is UE under S78 as what they sent me wasn't even an application form but data about me from their intranet .

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dx all that article shows is how profitable debt purchase can be not that anything understand has gone on. Trust me i hate them as well but it is part of a perverted capitalist society and greedy financial sector.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

According to my last MBNA statement I owed £8563.89 on Link's letter I owe them £8575.89. Also there is no PPI. Also my credit limit was £8300.00 but with charges ect it went over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is something very wrong somewhere if MBNA has sold a debt of that size

 

you need to SAR MBNA and find the reason.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as in post 16

 

 

always the OC original creditor

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no let 'em sweat.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...