Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Indeed, it’s all up to date at the moment and no missed payments and no issues from a credit file perspective everything is up to date in that sense 
    • follow it thru, plenty of time to poss arrange a tomlin or consent later on. ............   pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466952-lowelloverdales-claimform-old-cap1-debt/?do=findComment&comment=5260464 .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] .............. dx
    • so you've never been issued a default notice ever and all these accounts still show on your credit file?  
    • No i decided I would try and keep paying this down as best I possibly could and have paid over 35k off of the total amount. It’s been hard as hell tbh but just seems too much to do with the prospect of job disruption looking. the issue I have with pro rats is the credit file is trashed anyhow like you are defaulted anyhow is it not? I am willing to trash it for 6 years if needs must but having it trashed for over a decade seems crazy. This is the dilemma I am in
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sick vs CAI Finance / Moon Beever / Lloyds TSB Overdraft***Settled by Consent***


sick.as.a.chip
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3555 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

From what I can see I think I have 2 choices. Try for the set aside and get my application into the court today paying cash for the fee and ask that the 'order for questioning' be stayed pending the outcome of the set aside request.

Or

Ring the claimant and offer them some money to go away. I can't see them accepting much less than they have the ccj for as they have the ccj now unless I tell them I can't pay the whole amount.

Not sure I can cope with the additional stress?

Anyone's advise would be appreciated?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 217
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Or simply submit a N245 to request a manageable monthly payment and to halt the Order for Questioning.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You wont get a set a side for a family bereavement sick IMHO.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The N245 fee is £40 or you may be exempt if on low income.Set a side would be £80 which I think would fail.

Considering what you have had to deal with of late Sick I don't think you need any further hassle and stress.I would chalk it down to a loss and a lesson and concentrate on your family.

 

PS It would not become statute barred in December the clock stopped when they issued the claim.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The N245 fee is £40 or you may be exempt if on low income.Set a side would be £80 which I think would fail.

Considering what you have had to deal with of late Sick I don't think you need any further hassle and stress.I would chalk it down to a loss and a lesson and concentrate on your family.

 

PS It would not become statute barred in December the clock stopped when they issued the claim.

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

Thank you Andy. I've been looking at the paperwork and moon beever said they sent me further documentation 2 days after the assignments but I've no record of another letter. I'm going to ring the sols in the morning. Appreciate your honesty Andy thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Andy. I've been looking at the paperwork and moon beever said they sent me further documentation 2 days after the assignments but I've no record of another letter. I'm going to ring the sols in the morning. Appreciate your honesty Andy thank you.

 

More confused than ever.

Checked noodle this morning after speaking with the sols to request a copy of the letter they apparently sent in September which they are re sending today.

Noodle has this account on twice.

One by Lloyd's bank shows start date of June. Default of dec 2008. Feb 2008 said ok. March changed to AA what ever that means and by June 2008 it was BB? This is the Lloyd's bit. This also shows as an unsecured loan but they say it's an overdraft. I honestly don't think I would have owed anywhere near this much on an overdraft. They are sending me copy statements from 2006 to 2008 which was apparently in the letter from September.

It's on again as 1st credit same details with regards to start date and default date and as an unsecured loan!

Any idea how I double check what what's right please????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please can someone help me. I've been and dug out some paperwork and I was right this IS NOT AN OVERDRAFT!!!!!! It's a personal loan!!!!

They have got a default judgement and a solicitor has confirmed it's an overdraft!!

Please help I'm fuming and I don't know what to do.

A solicitor from moon beever has signed a STATEMENT OF TRUTH for the court saying it was an overdraft. Hoe can they not know???

Please I know it's late but can anyone please tell me what I need to do now??

Many thanks

Really really sick as a chip!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you wish to go back and argue the claim then that can only be done by a set a side.......but getting the set a side we have already covered......its your call but it could be a waste of £80.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you wish to go back and argue the claim then that can only be done by a set a side.......but getting the set a side we have already covered......its your call but it could be a waste of £80.

 

Andy

Does it not matter about the solicitor not telling the truth on the poc and then a statement of truth?

Can they lie on a county court claim?

I believe it just goes to show they can't even get the agreement type correct.

Is that not enought for a set aside? That the particulars of claim are not correct.

I know I have to be careful about how I know this is not an overdraft.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In all honesty they would just change the particulars of claim and then it proceeds again...but its not a valid point to set a side...the court would state you had your chance to defend at the time.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

After careful consideration and after speaking to the claimants solicitor I have decided against great advice (andy) that I need to give the set aside a try. I have completed the form and said I am relying on my witness statement. I'm going to post it up if anyone would kindly have a look over it for me please make sure I'm not making any massive obvious mistakes???

 

WITNESS STATEMENT OF SICK AS A CHIP

 

My full name is SICK AS A CHIP

I reside at MY HOUSE

I make this statement in my defence. This statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

1. I received a N1CPC Claim form dated 21ST January 2013 from Northampton County Court. Amount claimed was £35XX.XX plus costs totalling £3670.44.

2. I returned my Acknowledgement of Service to the court.

3. I then sent on 1st February 2013 a CPR 31.14 request to Moon Beever, 260 Avenue West, Skyline 120, Great Notley, Essex, CM77 7AA, recorded delivery,

4. Proof of delivery on 6th February 2013. copy of proof of delivery can be supplied.

5. On the 16th February I again wrote and faxed Moon Beever Solicitors requesting an extension to file my defence as my CPR 31.14 request had not been acknowledged nor any of the requested documents provided.

6. Letter from Moon Beever dated 21st February stating they were willing to grant me an extension to 21st March 2013 to file my defence while they located the requested documents from my CPR 31.14 request and enclosing a letter of assignment and a letter confirming date of assignment stating the other documents requested have been requested and they hope to revert to me shortly. Copy letter can be provided. Notice of assignment provided with amout stated as £33xx.xx. (£126.44 different from claim amount excluding costs)

7. On Friday 22nd March my Mother un-expectantly died in her sleep, death certificate and post mortem report can be provided on request to show circumstances, at which point having already lost my father at age 13 I and my 2 siblings became executors of her estate and had to arrange her funeral.

8. My deadline for filing a defence was missed and a default judgement was issued on 10th December 2013 from Northampton County Court for £37xx.x (plus costs totalling £39xx.xx)

9. I then received a N24 direction order stating the stay on proceedings had been lifted and default judgement had been granted without a hearing. Attached to the order was an Application notice from the claimants solicitors Moon Beever dated 19th November 2013 with a signed statement of truth.

10. Having not received the letter mentioned in the statement of truth dated 24th September I telephoned the claimant solicitor to request a copy of the letter.

11. I received a copy of the letter and enclosures I have attached a copy with my statement where in paragraph 2 Moon Beever state that there is no requirement for an overdraft facility to have an executed agreement. In the enclosures page 4 paragraph 2 highlighted clearly states that the claim is subject to a written agreement.

12. I wholly dispute that this is an overdraft agreement as alleged by the claimant in there particulars of claim and also in a written statement of truth by the claimants solicitor on the application notice dated 19th November 2013. I do not believe the solicitor in this case has infact read any of the documents in this case and has stated that this is an overdraft when in actual fact this is not a current account reference number for any account I have ever held with Lloyds TSB the original creditor. I have written a formal complaint to Moon Beever regarding the solicitors not following any pre court protocol in reading documents sent out.

13. I note however I am still outstanding the following documents from my CPR 31.14 request:

Ø Overdraft conformation and terms and conditions

Ø Demand/termination notice

Ø Notices of sums of arrears

I, the Defendant, confirm the facts in this my statement are true and I believe I have a real prospect of defending this claim.

Signed ……………………………… sick as a chip

Dated 28th February 2014

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having only read your witness statement, just like the judge at the set aside hearing, I don't really understand why you say you have a defence. Is it that they said it was an overdraft and you say it's not? You also seem to say it's not a current account either, what was it?

 

Also, don't accuse the solicitor of not having read the papers. All that will do is annoy the judge and make it seem like you have nothing of more substance to say in your defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One more thing, don't say that you have evidence. Take copies and attach them to your application, bring the originals to the hearing. It's no good producing documents on the day that haven't been seen previously or, even worse, not producing the documents and all and just saying "you can see them later if you want".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply. It is not a current account nor an overdraft. I can't think of a better way to say that the solicitors have got it wrong but will welcome any suggestions. I'll copy and Mark up each document I'm referring to but am reluctant to do that with a death certificate and postmortem report do you think it will make a difference?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry your main question was what was my defence. I dont have one as I have not been supplied with the information I have requested which is why I want to start again if possible with a set aside. I had previously adhered to all the timescales and my record keeping prior to my mum's death was perfect. I honestly know this is my fault but I do believe things would have turned out differently had I not been in such a state over my mum. I know I could be throwing my set aside fee away but I need to do myself justice and try to sort my mess out! Thank you for your reply

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi i have amended my statement to accompny my set aswide. Any opinions if this is any better???

Many thanks:|

WITNESS STATEMENT OF [NAME][/SIZE]

 

My full name is sick as a chip

I reside at my house

I make this statement in my defence. This statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

1. I received a N1CPC Claim form dated 21ST January 2013 from Northampton County Court.

2. I returned my Acknowledgement of Service to the court.

3. I then sent on 1st February 2013 a CPR 31.14 request to Moon Beever, 260 Avenue West, Skyline 120, Great Notley, Essex, CM77 7AA, recorded delivery,

4. Proof of delivery on 6th February 2013.

5. On the 16th February I again wrote and faxed, fax transmition report enclosed, to Moon Beever Solicitors requesting an extension to file my defence as my CPR 31.14 request had not been acknowledged nor any of the requested documents provided.

6. Letter from Moon Beever dated 21st February stating they were willing to grant me an extension to 21st March 2013 to file my defence while they located the requested documents from my CPR 31.14 request and enclosing a letter of assignment and a letter confirming date of assignment stating the other documents requested have been requested and they hope to revert to me shortly.

7. On Friday 22nd March my Mother un-expectantly died in her sleep, post mortem report can be provided on request to show circumstances, at which point having already lost my father at age 13 I and my 2 siblings became executors of her estate and had to arrange her funeral.

8. My deadline for filing a defence was missed and a default judgement was issued on 10th December 2013 from Northampton County Court.

9. I then received a N24 direction order stating the stay on proceedings had been lifted and default judgement had been granted without a hearing. Attached to the order was an Application notice from the claimants solicitors Moon Beever dated 19th November 2013 with a signed statement of truth.

10. Having not received the letter mentioned in the statement of truth dated 24th September I telephoned the claimant solicitor to request a copy of the letter.

11. I received a copy of the letter and enclosures I have attached a copy with my statement where in paragraph 2 Moon Beever state that there is no requirement for an overdraft facility to have an executed agreement. In the enclosures page 4 paragraph 2 highlighted clearly states that the claim is subject to a written agreement.

12. I wholly dispute that this is an overdraft agreement as alleged by the claimant in there particulars of claim and also in a written statement of truth by the claimants solicitor on the application notice dated 19th November 2013. My credit file shows this as an “Unsecured Loan”.

13. I note however I am still outstanding the following documents from my CPR 31.14 request:

Ø Overdraft conformation and terms and conditions

Ø Demand/termination notice

Ø Notices of sums of arrears

I respectfully request a stay to the Order for Questioning at Morpeth & Berwick County Court on xx March 2014 at xx pending the outcome of my Set Aside application.

I, the Defendant, confirm the facts in this my statement are true and I believe I have a real prospect of defending this claim.

Signed ………………………………

Dated 28th February 2014

Edited by ims21
Link to post
Share on other sites

Frankly, I'm still struggling to understand what your defence is but it may be that I'm simply failing to understand. Maybe others will comment on whether or not they understand it and we can see if the problem is with me or the statement!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So basically it boils down to the fact that you have a judgment for an overdraft...the claimant did not plead the correct particulars...it is in fact a personal loan...Sick if the particulars were correct and they stated Personal Loan account number xxxxxxxxxxx what would your defence be then?

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...