Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yeeeeees! Well done on your victory!  👏
    • Hearing held today in court. I attended in person and Evri had an advocate attend on their behalf to defend their position that my contract is with Packlink and not with them. I also provided a copy of Evri's terms and conditions which explains that a contract is entered into when a parcel is sent with Evri. The judge pointed this out to the Advocate and agreed there is a contract between me and Evri under the Ts and Cs. The judge explained that while Packlink are responsible for organising the delivery of the item, it is Evri who are responsible for handling the goods and delivering them, and therefor Evri has a responsibility to handle the goods with reasonable care and skill. So am pleased to say the judge found in my favour. Hearing lasted about 75mins. Evri has been ordered to make payment within 21 days. Also nice to meet @jk2054 in person.
    • Good morning,    I just wanted to update you on the situation.    I have visits piling up with my current employment and they need doing before I finish at the end of this month.  I am moving to Wiltshire in 3 weeks for a new job helping care homes with their Dementia patients. I tried to work it out and at a guess I will be doing about 20-25,000 miles a year. So need a vehicle that can cope with that mileage, my old car would have done it easy but 🤷‍♂️ I have taken out a loan and got a friend to find me a reliable car that can cope with the miles and hasn't been written off in the past.   I phoned Adrian flux to see if I could use the last months insurance on a new car I have bought, the girl I spoke to phoned Markerstudy and asked them but they said no, my new car doesn't have any modifications.    I had an email from someone who saw one of my appeals for information, they live near the site of the accident and know a nearby farmer who has a security camera at his entrance that catches the traffic and specifically registration plates as he has been robbed before. They said they would reach out for me and see if he still has the data. Unfortunately it wont catch the scene of the crash.   The Police phoned me and said they were closing the report I made, even if they found footage of the vehicle at the time I said the actual incident would be my word vs theirs.  My first response was I am sure google maps would show that they turned around at that location which would verify my version of events, but upon reflection I do understand, I have seen people doing make up with both hands while driving, eating from a bowl steering with their knees and veering all over the place. I am sure some of these people go off the road and claim that someone forced them off.    Markerstudy phoned me yesterday to say that my car is now at Copart, the £80 tank of Vpower diesel was emptied on entry to the site for safety reasons, which I get but it sucks.  It is awaiting being assessed and shouldn't be too long, which is a relief.  I am really glad things do not seem to be going the way of the other stories and they seem to moving quickly.   However I was informed that my car was a structural write off before I bought it - this destroyed me, I was almost sick.  and this is going to affect any offer of money - after hearing the first statement this didn't affect me.   They need to wait for the assessor to check it over but it is highly likely to be written off and the maximum they can offer is £2300.  I was desperate for a car as I was working for an agency at the time, no work no pay, and did not do a vehicle check because I didn't know about them.  The seller did not tell me that it had been structurally written off, he told me that it had the front wing damaged while parked and was repaired at an approved repairer.  Markerstudy records state that it was sold at auction, no record of repair at an approved repairer.  I bought it bank transfer with hand written receipt.    It gets worse.    It turns out my airbags should of gone off. For some reason they are not working. I think we can figure out why.  If I had hit that car head on and had no airbags.    Some good news.    I can arrange a time with Copart to go and take my stereo equipment and any personal items that are left in the car only. I cant live without music and need quality sound, my speakers and amps are Hertz and JLaudio, (no I am not a boy racer with booming subs, I am an audiophile on a budget) I was really worried I wouldn't get them back so this is a huge relief for me. It is stuff I have built up over years of saving and collecting. Everything to do with the vehicle and mods I have declared need to stay to be assessed.   The accident has gone as a fault on my record, I have to remove 2 years NCB which means I still have some to declare which is good.  So it appears at this point that it may be resolved quickly, not in the way I was hoping, but not as bad as I presumed it was going to be based upon that tow truck drivers attitude and behaviour and the horror stories I read.   I am not going to buy the car back and try to make money with all the parts on it, I don't have the time or energy.   I may need an xray on my back and neck.  The whole situation has left me feeling physically sick, drained and I need it done.   The lesson learnt from this  -  My conscience is 100% clear, my attitude to safety and strong sense of personal responsibility - A rated tyres even if on credit card, brake fluid flush every year, regular checks of pads and discs, bushes etc, made avoiding what I believed to be a certain broadside collision possible.   Get a dashcam (searching now for the best I can afford at the moment)  -  Research your insurance company before you buy  -  Pay for total car check before you go and see a car and take someone with you if you are not confident in your ability to assess a vehicle.      Thank you to everyone here who volunteers their time, energy and information, it is greatly appreciated.  You helped my sister with some advice a while ago but we weren't able to follow through, she is struggling with long term health conditions and I ended up in hospital for a while with myocarditis, when I got out and remembered it was too late.  I am going to make a donation now, it is not a lot, I wish I could give more, I will try to come back when things are on a more even keel.    Take care
    • It seems the solicitor has got your case listed for this “appeal” but not for the Stat Dec(SD). You need to ensure you can perform your SD on the day. If you are able to make your SD in court, the situation you are in now is more straightforward than if you made your SD via a solicitor. You have been convicted of two offences (and two were dropped) via proceedings of which you were not aware. The way to remedy that is to perform an SD. No appeal is necessary (nor is it available via the magistrates’ court). If you are able to make your SD this is how I see it panning out: You will make your SD to the court. The court must allow you to make it as it will have been made within 21 days of you discovering your convictions. You will then be asked to enter pleas to the four charges again. At this point you should plead not guilty to all four but make the court aware that you will plead guilty to the speeding charges on the condition that the FtP charges are dropped. The prosecutor will be asked whether or not this is agreed. In my opinion the overwhelming likelihood is that it will be. If it is you will be sentenced for the two speeding offences under the normal guidelines. In the unlikely event it is not accepted,  the speeding charges will be withdrawn (they have no evidence you were driving). You have no viable defence to the FtP charges and so should plead guilty. This will mean 12 points and a “totting up” ban (as you have already suffered). You can present an “Exceptional Hardship” argument to try to avoid this (explained below).   Because of this, I don’t see any need to make an argument to ask to have any ban suspended (pending an appeal to the Crown Court) unless and until you are banned again. The only reason I can think the solicitor suggested this is to secure a (Magistrates')  court date. I was surprised when you said you had an appointment so quickly; a date for an SD usually takes longer than that. However, if you can use it to your advantage, all well and good. I can’t comment on the argument that the two speeding offences were committed “on the same occasion” as I don’t have the details. That phrase is not defined anywhere and is a matter for the court to decide. It’s an interesting thought (and only that) that such an argument could equally be made for the two FtP offences. If the requests for driver’s details arrived at your old address at the same time, with the same deadline for reply, it could be argued that you failed to respond to hem both “on the same occasion” (i.e when the 28 days to respond expired) and so should only receive penalty points for one. Hopefully you won’t need to go there. I think you have information about avoiding a “totting up” ban. But here’s the magistrates’ latest guidance on "Exceptional Hardship" (EH) which they refer to: When considering whether there are grounds to reduce or avoid a totting up disqualification the court should have regard to the following: It is for the offender to prove to the civil standard of proof that such grounds exist. Other than very exceptionally, this will require evidence from the offender, and where such evidence is given, it must be sworn. Where it is asserted that hardship would be caused, the court must be satisfied that it is not merely inconvenience, or hardship, but exceptional hardship for which the court must have evidence; Almost every disqualification entails hardship for the person disqualified and their immediate family. This is part of the deterrent objective of the provisions combined with the preventative effect of the order not to drive. If a motorist continues to offend after becoming aware of the risk to their licence of further penalty points, the court can take this circumstance into account. Courts should be cautious before accepting assertions of exceptional hardship without evidence that alternatives (including alternative means of transport) for avoiding exceptional hardship are not viable; Loss of employment will be an inevitable consequence of a driving ban for many people. Evidence that loss of employment would follow from disqualification is not in itself sufficient to demonstrate exceptional hardship; whether or not it does will depend on the circumstances of the offender and the consequences of that loss of employment on the offender and/or others. I must say, I still do not understand what the solicitor means by “As a safeguard we have lodged the appeal and applied to suspend your ban pending appeal due to the time limit for being able to automatically appeal without getting leave of the Judge.” When they speak of “leave of the judge” I assume they mean they have lodged an appeal with the Crown Court. I don’t know what for or why they would do this. It seems to follow on from their explanation of the “totting up” ban. If so, I’m surprised that the Crown Court has accepted an appeal against something that has not yet happened. But as I said, i is no clear to me. Only you can decide whether to employ your solicitor to represent you in court. If it was me I would not because there is nothing he can say that you cannot say yourself. However, I am fairly knowledgeable of the process and confident I can deal with it. That said, I do have a feeling that the solicitor is somewhat “over egging the pudding” by introducing such things as appeals to the Crown Court which, in all honesty, you can deal with if they are required. I can only say that the process you will attempt to employ is by no means unusual and all court users will be familiar with it. I can also say that I have only ever heard of one instance where it was refused. In summary, it is my view that it is very unlikely that your offer to do the deal will be refused. If it is accepted, you may be able to persuade he court that the two speeding offences occurred "on the same occasion" and so should only receive one lot of points. Let me know the details (timings, places, etc) and I'll give you my opinion. Just in case your offer is refused, you should have your EH argument ready. Whether it's worth paying what will amount to many hundreds of pounds to pay someone to see this through is your call.  Let me know if I can help further.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

WFI appt has arrived but given varying information by ESA - please help


pipistrollers
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4155 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I did start a thread about the ATOS assessment under a different section but as it has moved forward I though I should now come to this section as the situation has moved on and appears to be getting worse where the Govt depts are concerned. Help is needed please.

 

The person I care for has lodged an appeal after being put into the WRAG. He, his doctor and myself as his carer all strongly feel that he should have been put into the support group. His written appeal was sent in together with a statement from me as his carer plus supporting statement from his doctor. His doctor wrote an indepth supporting statement and stated that any structured regime is completely unrealistic for him including the work focussed group and that he loses control of his bowel and bladder during seizures which is extremely distressing. She also wrote a lot more but we felt that these were the main points to tell you so you can see how crazy this situation is. I wrote in my supporting statment that during a Grand-Mal epilepsy seizure he loses complete control of his bowel and bladder, and after a seizure care is needed including changing his clothing, washing him and cleaning any mess which has gone on the floor - I am cutting a long story short here!

 

ATOS were asked on 3 or 4 different occasions to please send a copy of the DM report so I could see how the decision to put him into WRAG was made in order that appeal could be written but it was never sent. They sent a copy of the doctor's medical form instead. After this, they were called again but even now, after the appeal has been submitted, it has never been sent. We based his appeal on the doctors medical form which is full of contradictions, eg. she wrote on one page that he was incontenant during fits but then on the next page put that he is not. The report is full of this. We basically went through it and highlighted all these discrepancies and contradictions which was the basis of the appeal without the DM report - it's all we could do.

 

An appointment letter for WFI has now arrived. I phoned ESA who said that I was to call the number on the letter and tell them that the WRAG is being appealed as he, his doctor and his carer all feel strongly that he has been put into the wrong group and supporting evidence has been sent in with appeal. the ESA operator also said that the WFI appt could easily be deferred until after the appeal if it was all explained. I called the number on the letter to be spoken to by a really nasty woman. She wouldn't listen to anything I told her and spoke over me the whole way through the call. Even after I did get her to listen and told her of the situation, she said that he MUST attend this WFI appt even though he is appealing and said that ESA had given wrong information and it cannot be deferred. What is the truth?

 

She asked why he had been given a home visit for the assessment and agreed that ATOS deemed it as, if there was an emergency at the assessment centre, he couldnt go down all the stairs to get out and that the panic would induce a seizure. This woman said that if there was an emergency during the WFI appt, it would cause no problems as there are lifts in the jobcentre offices - she repeated this again after being told that if there is an emergency, you can't use lifts! She even said that it could be done on ground level probably. She stuck to her guns and said he MUST attend this WFI appt at 9.15 in the morning next week. I told her that he cannot go to any appts early morning as he has to get up very slowly and take his time as if he doesnt, he will have a seizure. She said she was going to send an email to someone in appts who is (allegedly) going to phone me tomorrow. She said that a telephone appt might be permitted but she isnt sure.

 

Can anything be done? If they insist he goes to the appt and he does go, it makes a mockery of his appeal and supporting evidence written by his doctor and will most certainly cause him to have more seizures that day - he has between 6 and 8 per week as it is! If he doesnt go, the nasty woman today said he would be in trouble for failing to keep their appt and his benefit would be affected.

 

My head is mush, he has had 2 extra seizures today because of all this.

 

Please if anyone can help quickly it would be appreciated as they are allegedly calling tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure this a formal WFI?

 

I was invited in while my appeal was ongoing. It turned out it was not obligatory. i.e. I did not have to go.

 

I have very limited experience here, but i have some.

 

Do you have a Tribunal date?

 

Blurred:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is a formal appt for WFI.

 

No the appeal has only got as far as the first stage i.e., the DM looks at it again and if it does not go right then we take it further and keep going to tribunal.

 

See part of the problem being experienced is that they are saying he is fit to attend the WFI as it was deemed so by their assessing doctor. My arguement to them on his behalf is that the doctor contradicted herself right through her report form. My arguement is also that his own doctor has said that he is not fit enough.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds to me like the usual mish mash of things happening as far as JCP goes.

 

I THINK you would be OK for your fiend not to attend (I was but I cannot remember if mine was a formal WFI), but, you really need an better answer than I can give.

 

I think the question you want answering is "Having made an appeal and had my decision referred to a DM, I have received a WFI letter. I have yet to receive a response from the DM. Am I obliged to attend the WFI?"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I think that's the easiest way of putting it. Sorry my head is like mashed potatoes at the moment

 

Hope it helps. Smetimes you just need someone to pick out the details. Don't worry about the mashed potatoes, I know all about them, don't worry. I say don't worry, what I mean is it affects everyone, and you are not alone. It's always easier to deal with a situation when you are not involved. It's true in real life, and it's true on the forums.

 

It might not be a bad idea to put a fresh, more more concise query up on the forum in the morning.

 

It might go "I recently had WCA, and I was placed in the WRAG. I have since lodged an appeal, as I feel I should be in the SG, and this has been referred to a DM. In the mean time, I have been invited to a WFI. The reality (and reason for my appeal) is that I have severe continence issues, and therefore cannot attend.Will my benefits be stopped if I fail to attend this WFI? Is there an alternative such as a WFI at home?"

 

Just a thought! I am off to bed, hope this helps!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update to the saga ....

 

I was supposed to be called today by the WFI person. No call so I called the same dept I called yesterday. Was told that I should have been called already and apologised. I was told another message was being sent requesting a call about the WFI appt and it would come in on monday. I told the operator i was worried as if no call comes on Monday, appt is first appt Tuesday morning. I was told if no call comes, then dont go to the appt as it's her job to contact me which she hasnt done. I was told that the line manager has been copied into todays message. I don't trust these ppl as they've given me wrong information already so if i don't go to the appt I could face problems from them yet I can't go to the appt they made for me

Link to post
Share on other sites

I f you are booked for a WFI then you are not in the SG.

You can request that appointment is rebooked or considered for deferal.

The WFI appointments are now mandatory so I hope you manage to get it deferred until the appeal is heard at least and then with luck the WFI won't be needed.

It might only be an initial 1 month deferral though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that's what I'm hoping for -that they will defer the appt until the appeal is done with. He should be in the SG but they put him in WRAG. the woman I spoke to yesterday said appts cant be dererred until apeal is over and he must go. Am trying to get this phone call done with his advisor to see what she says though. Even the assessing ATOS doctor wrote that even in the long term a return to work is highly unlikely and that his condition is not going to improve. His GP wrote the same yet they put him into WRAG!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Help needed please on a very similar situation, sorry for hijacking this thread but cant find how I start my own. I was placed in Wrag Contribution Based in November 2011. I sent in my appeal straight away as I feel I should be in the SG. The appeal only went to Tribunal in November 2012 at the same time as my Esa payments were stopped because of the 365 day rule, I do not qualify for the Income based Esa. Today I received a letter to attend a WFI early in February 2013, my question is, do I have to attend this appointment as my Esa has already stopped, or do I have to attend whilst I am appealing, thanks for any input guys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

pipistrollers I know that they can't usually defer the appointment for too long as there are target dates that a customer needs be interviewed by. I would suggest asking to speak to the DEA adviser and asking for the appointment to either be a telehone interview or for a home visit, (if it is a home visit then they may be accompanied by a Compliance Officer that is standard practice for any officers to be accompanied in he event of home visits).

 

bladerunner it's the same answer, the WFI is mandatory, you can request the appointment is changed if it is inconvenient but you will required to attend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Flumps surely I dont have to attend???? I am no longer classed as an Esa benefit claimant, am I?? as I said before my payments stopped last November because of the 365 day rule. Seems a bit crazy to me that I never had to attend a WFI during the 365 days I was in Wrag, then 3 months after Esa stopped they want me in for a WFI. I dont qualify for any other benefits including Jsa as my partner works and we have savings above the threshold.

Edited by bladerunner22
Link to post
Share on other sites

You are not receiving payment but for as long as you claim ESA and have your NI record updated then yes you are still required to attend. Although any sanctions wouldn't impact you now if your circumstances changed and you subsequently became entitled to Income Related ESA the sanctions would still be there iygwim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been searching the web for clarification at what you say Flumps, came across the Esa guidlines which looks like they were updated last November 2012. It states WFI"s are voluntary for

1. Support Group

2. Credits Only Claimants

3. Lone Parents with a child uner the age of 5.

So looks like I"m off the hook for the time being, think I will still phone DWP Monday though just to make sure/

Link to post
Share on other sites

pipistrollers I know that they can't usually defer the appointment for too long as there are target dates that a customer needs be interviewed by. I would suggest asking to speak to the DEA adviser and asking for the appointment to either be a telehone interview or for a home visit, (if it is a home visit then they may be accompanied by a Compliance Officer that is standard practice for any officers to be accompanied in he event of home visits).

 

bladerunner it's the same answer, the WFI is mandatory, you can request the appointment is changed if it is inconvenient but you will required to attend.

 

Flumps that is what I am trying to do. There is a telephone number on the WFI appt letter to call if you can't make the appt. I called it and was told a message was being sent to the advisor who will be doing the WFI. She was to call within 24 hours which she didnt do. I called again after the 24 hours was up and was told that another message was being sent to contact him and myself on Monday. My worry is that I was told that if she doesn't contact on Monday I was told that he shouldn't go to the appt. as they are supposed to call back with 24 hours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It could be that the adviser who you are due to see is a full time worker and you called on their non working day, they could have been sick on leave, training, unable to attend work due another reason including the recent travel disruption due the weathere. Not all staff in an office will be aware of other working patterns.

 

Another explanantion is that the adviser was fully booked with other appointments all day and was working solidly until office closing or the end of their working day and the message was/wasn't picked up or have the time to reply.

Frustrating as it is unfortunate that these things happen.

I personally never put a time frame on any call back that a customer requests as unless I'm doing it for myself I can't guage how the other person will be to reply iygwim, and to have that done to me and then receive such an ear bashing if I don't call back within the time frame a colleague has promised because I wasn't in work or off working another job role isn't good customer service for the person expecting a reply or to me or a colleague.

 

I would not go to the appointment but call again on Monday to explain that you won't be attending as per the reasons already given and could you please have a call back to discuss further at the earliest convenient time that the adviser has if they are unable to transfer you directly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi flumps

 

Yes she is a full time WFI worker. I actually told the operator I spoke to yesterday when the call didnt come that perhaps she couldn't get into work because of the weather. He told me that if a staff member does not come into work then it shows at his end because of ppl like me calling which made sense. He confirmed that she was in work yesterday and should have called back.

 

Where not picking up the message or not having time to respond is concerned, it was the operator who told me that they have 24 hours in which to respond and the second operator yesterday told me that there is no reason that it was not done, admitted it was the WFI advisor's fault and apologised. I didn't put a timeframe on them, it was the operator who told me that they have 24 hours to respond. It works by caling the given number and they then send a message (i suppose by email) to the relevant person who then has 24 hours to get back to me. Thats what the DWP operator told me and I have also found this to be the case in other DWP departments.

Edited by pipistrollers
made mistake
Link to post
Share on other sites

oh that isn't in place where I work as ther are two or three of us who are in position to answer the phones, we don't have a telephony team and the advisers phones hash through if not answered within 6 rings and then they are on a round robin of the 3 numbers answering calls, although recently we have been depleted in numbers and at times it has only been me on phones as well as all other jobs.

We are instructed by management not to give time frames and despite working there for years people change their work patterns, days off and training we can't keerp track of who is in and who isn't.

Don't even have time to walk around to find out who is in or not :o

 

not an excuse simply an explanation of how it works where I am, but definitely call Monday morning to inform tat you are not able to attend, just in case the operative you spoke to hasn't noted your records.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...