Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please will you upload the defence in a PDF format document
    • Afternoon All - after 3 weeks of silence, this morning I received an email from HMCTS advising that P2G have rejected my claim. Decide whether to proceed Parcel2Go.com has rejected your claim. You need to decide whether to proceed with the claim. You need to respond before 4pm on 25 June 2024. Your claim won’t continue if you don’t respond by then. This is their ‘defence’ Their defence Why they disagree with the claim When choosing a service on the Defendants website, the Claimant chose to book their order with Evri and selected to take out £20 parcel protection which comes with the service. On the first page of the booking process, the Claimant entered the value of £265 for the contents and was offered parcel protection for loss or damages against their goods for £13.99 + VAT. The Claimant selected no, which then produced a pop up which explained 'We strongly recommend that you protect the full value of your item(s).' however, the Claimant still did not take this protection out and instead continued with the booking process. At the end of the booking process, the Claimant was offered this again which was refused and the Claimant continued with the booking by accepting the terms and conditions which re-iterates the information provided in the booking process. The parcel was sent, however, seems to be delayed in transit. The parcel finally started to track again, however, when delivered the parcel was empty with no contents. As such, the claim was re-opened and attempted to be settled for the £20 protection taken out in the booking process. This was refused by the Claimant as they felt they should be paid the full amount of the value entered when booking. Unfortunately, due to the refusal of the parcel protection in the booking process the Defendant is not liable to settle the claim to the value and only to the parcel protection taken out. The Defendant shall rely on the Terms and Conditions of carriage in particular section 9. The Defendant understands that the contents have not be handled with due care and attention, which is not being disputed, however, they are disputing the amount they are liable to. They have requested mediation, I’m sure not least to drag the case out even longer, but I can see no benefit to me in this and so shall reject it. As ever, I’d welcome your thoughts guys. g59   
    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
    • thats down to mcol making that option available for you to select, you cant force it. typically if there are known processing delays at northants bulk it will be atleast 14 days later if not more.
    • Thanks   Noting the day to apply for default judgement if necessary
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with Lowell & Orange Account


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4095 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Folks

I'm hoping someone can give me some advice with Lowell Portfolio.

In Novemeber I received a letter from Lowell advising me that they had bought a debt of £25 from Orange in relation to a phone contract in 2009. I foolishly paid even though I had not received anything from Orange advising me of a debt and there was nothing logged on my credit file in relation to defaults or missed payments.

In December I received an Experian alert informing me that Lowell had logged a default against my report. When I looked they had placed the Default on my file in relation to the Orange account and marked it as settled.

I wrote to Lowell and asked them for information in relation to the original debt (agreements etc) and the original default notice. This morning I received my £1 postal order back and a letter stating some of the following points:-

  • "In the case of mobile contracts, inserting the SIM card and usage of the equipment is taken as acceptance of the terms and conditions of the contract. We are therefore not obliged to send you such agreements which can be obtained over the phone" (this contract was signed in store).
  • "The default notice is a technical document which is appied to a credit agreement should, the customer fail to repay their account over a prolonged period of time. Mobile phones do not have a credit agreement they have a service agreement and as such default notices do not apply. Should the customer fail to repay their mobile bill then they have breached their service agreement and will be issued with a suspension notice. The suspention notice is sufficient to report to the Credit Refrence Agencies."
  • "When the account entered into default with Orange (I received no notification of this and it was never on my credit file) they would have recorded a default on your creti file (they never). When the account was purchased by us the original default was amended by us."

I am confused as they are saying that defaults don't apply to mobile phone accounts, but there is one on my file. As Orange had never placed a default on my file or sent me any notices should Lowell therefore have entered a default on my file.

 

I am not sure where to go from here, I have also contacted Orange who have stated they can't see my account history but there is no outstanding debt. Any advice would be appreciated.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What you will have to do is find out from Orange whether you ever owed them any money and if you did not, get this confirmed in writing. Armed with the information, you can then send a complaint to Lowells asking for your £25 back, the default removed and appropriate compensation for their error.

 

It is not unusual for companies to have a debt on mobile phone contract, not to contact the phone contract owner, not to note a default on a credit record and then to pass the debt to a DCA. It is not a default re CCA, but a non payment of a payment contractually due. But the mobile network provider would have had to write to you advising of this non payment and asking for payment I think within 30 days, before they could note your credit record.

 

If you find out from Orange that you owed the money and they did write to you, then I cannot see a problem with Lowell noting your credit file on behalf of Orange to show the debt as being satisfied. But you have to find out from Orange, why the debt was due and why you were not informed.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Thank You for the info, I will contact Orange on Monday.

 

I have previously contacted them and they stated that they could no longer see all the details of my account as the details were with Lowell. I am certain I received no letters from Orange and that I owed them no money.

 

Hopefully they can clarify when I contact them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks

 

I'm hoping someone can give me some advice with Lowell Portfolio.

 

In Novemeber I received a letter from Lowell advising me that they had bought a debt of £25 from Orange in relation to a phone contract in 2009. I foolishly paid even though I had not received anything from Orange advising me of a debt and there was nothing logged on my credit file in relation to defaults or missed payments.

 

In December I received an Experian alert informing me that Lowell had logged a default against my report. When I looked they had placed the Default on my file in relation to the Orange account and marked it as settled.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I wrote to Lowell and asked them for information in relation to the original debt (agreements etc) and the original default notice. This morning I received my £1 postal order back and a letter stating some of the following points:-

  • "In the case of mobile contracts, inserting the SIM card and usage of the equipment is taken as acceptance of the terms and conditions of the contract. We are therefore not obliged to send you such agreements which can be obtained over the phone" (this contract was signed in store).

When you take a contract out, using the handset is agreeing to the terms and conditions.

  • "The default notice is a technical document which is appied to a credit agreement should, the customer fail to repay their account over a prolonged period of time. Mobile phones do not have a credit agreement they have a service agreement and as such default notices do not apply. Should the customer fail to repay their mobile bill then they have breached their service agreement and will be issued with a suspension notice. The suspention notice is sufficient to report to the Credit Refrence Agencies."

  • "When the account entered into default with Orange (I received no notification of this and it was never on my credit file) they would have recorded a default on your creti file (they never). When the account was purchased by us the original default was amended by us."

Mobile companies do record your payment information. Maybe Lowells just made it visible on the one you're checking?

 

 

I am confused as they are saying that defaults don't apply to mobile phone accounts, but there is one on my file. As Orange had never placed a default on my file or sent me any notices should Lowell therefore have entered a default on my file.

The regulations of recording defaults is part of the "consumer credit act" however you had no "credit"(ie the sale of money) So they do not have to follow the regulations set out with recording a default.

 

 

I am not sure where to go from here, I have also contacted Orange who have stated they can't see my account history but there is no outstanding debt. Any advice would be appreciated.

The debt will have been sold to Lowell

 

You are in a tough spot here, however you gain nothing by paying. In your shoes, I would only make any offer of payment on condition that they will completely remove the entry from the credit file (not just mark it settled) AND I would want this agreed in writing before I paid a penny.

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this amount was outstanding and has now been paid, the default, if recorded, should show the correct date when the default happened. Unless the debt had been sold, I think that it should show as Orange's, mot Lowell.

 

If Orange hadn't informed you of the outstanding amount then I think it would be worth pursuing Orange to get it removed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi FolksJust thought i'd update you on this - I have contacted Orange who said that they hold no details of my account as they have all been sent to Lowell. I contacted Lowell who said that the only information that they had was the default date and ammount of 29.95 (the statement they sent said £25). Lowell stated that Orange will have written to me and stated that I should contact them for copies of the letters as they don't have them. I recontacted Orange and was passed from person to person who each told me something different, I'm now sending a letter to Orange asking for details of what I owed and why and also copies of the final demands. I have also found my bank accounts showing my final payment to orange when my account was closed. I think it's a shocking system with the burden of proof appearing to be to fall to the consumer. Ill let you know any responses I get back from Orange

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi FolksJust thought i'd update you on this - I have contacted Orange who said that they hold no details of my account as they have all been sent to Lowell. I contacted Lowell who said that the only information that they had was the default date and ammount of 29.95 (the statement they sent said £25). Lowell stated that Orange will have written to me and stated that I should contact them for copies of the letters as they don't have them. I recontacted Orange and was passed from person to person who each told me something different, I'm now sending a letter to Orange asking for details of what I owed and why and also copies of the final demands. I have also found my bank accounts showing my final payment to orange when my account was closed. I think it's a shocking system with the burden of proof appearing to be to fall to the consumer. Ill let you know any responses I get back from Orange

 

It is up to Orange/Lowell to prove that you owe this money. Threaten Orange that you will take this to CISAS if necessary. http://www.cisas.org.uk/

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is also worth looking at your contract terms and conditions to see if it says whether Orange will update your credit reference file. I don't think that they normally do, it sounds as though Lowell have as a means of debt collection.

 

In any event, even if this debt was correct, this would not be a true reflection of how you conducted your account with orange and you might stand a good chance of demanding Lowell remove it on that basis alone. ie challenge them to add all of the account bills and payments under the orange name as well or remove their entry

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi GuysThanks for all the advice, I've fired an email off to Orange's (everywhere everything) credit query dept requesting information on the original debt and notifications and some other info. I'll post to let you know how i've got on. Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Folks Just an update on this situation, I have been passed from pillar to post with this - with neither Orange or Lowell wanting to take responisibility for the entry on my credit file. However after threatening Lowell with the OFT and providing evidence that Orange had not updated my address when I moved, they have agreed to remove the default from my credit file. Defo worth continuing the fight after initially been fobbed off!Thanks for the advice guys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...