Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cap One PPI - What to do next?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3748 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 204
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Just a thought.... I included in the spreadsheet only the PPI charges as made. So, would the interest that I am claiming from them include the couple of years 'after' ie: up until today?

 

on that sheet end the claim on the date they stopped charging you interest not the date of the last ppi payment

as in fact that is not correct,

 

you are entitled to 8% stat int on that figure

and any subsequent payments under the no int period

 

now you've been paying £5PCM for how long?

 

get a copy of the statint sheet

 

enter the total of the cisheet on the day the frozen int stated

and any subsequent payments too!

 

you'll need to work out the % of what of your £5 is PPI.

 

was the PPI 3.9% of the OD?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply dx

 

I will look in more detail onver the wekend.

 

"now you've been paying £5PCM for how long?"

 

Since the last date on the document until the present time.

 

 

"you'll need to work out the % of what of your £5 is PPI."

 

Sorry, maybe I should have included 'all' the statements for clarity? I can do that no problem. PPI appeared to stop after the last statement..... Appears to be when the payment arrangement comenced.

 

"was the PPI 3.9% of the OD?"

 

Sorry dx... you lost me? Original....??? (sounds like overdraft) ;)

 

Is there any further info I can provide to make it easier for the check?

 

Appreciate all the help

Link to post
Share on other sites

unless you have proof that the PPI was cancelled it wont be.

do your statements from 19/3/9 show it

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dx

Could I please ask that these files are now deleated..? as you have them.

 

Looking at the statements that follow there is no mention of PPI but there is mention of a new item "Purchase Interest" at vairing amounts ((£16 - 18))

 

I don't see proof the PPI was cancelled (as I dont see it agreed to ) I'll copy a random statement to give you an idea of what I have post the 19th

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

purchase int is the int you pay on items brought with the card during that month

i think , see the statements or T&C's

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx

I have been all through the SAR material and have found the following:

 

On the screen captures of my account on their system is states

PPI: N

Interest: 30.87

 

Card Protection Flag: Y

Payment Protection Flag: N

 

On the statements I see Cash Interest & Purchase Interest being charges up to 19/6/2010

 

Default Notice on 16/5/2010

 

I sought advice from CCCS and first letter sent on 25/6/2010

 

Hence I'm sure this is when interest stopped and also PPI.

 

I have scanned the remaining statements (so they are all available now) and I have amended the spreadsheet to what I think is correct. Please advise!!

 

Does it look correct?

 

Thanks

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok that looks ok just remember you are entitled to 8% stat int

on that figure till the date of you claim.

 

now what about the £12 penalty fees?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for looking over....

8% till the 'day I claim' ??? Do I just alter the date in the spreadsheet for that figure? Surely NOT? That takes it to £8,8,29 at the end of this month... never never?

 

"now what about the £12 penalty fees?"

 

Errm... Do they go on another claim?

 

So, presuming 'on' your answere to my first question... What the heck is my next move? Are there special templates I must send or just a simple letter (as has been mentioned earlier in the thread) and state the amout? or is there much more to it?

 

Let battle commence ;)

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

no use the statint sheet

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011

 

put the figure from your xls

into it at the date PPI stopped.

 

penalty charges are a sep claim yes

but nothing to stop you putting both claims in at the same time

 

you use the same foscisheet spready [sOC] Just open a new copy

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

your last spreadsheet at £3k ish looks correct

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again dx... Thanks for looking

 

Sorry to sound 'very' thick, but I'm just not getting it....

 

You said to claim 8% to the date I file the claim.

 

So, all I did was add the dates in the spready or have I got that calculating the 30.87% ?... or have I got it wrong. How do I include the 8% for those dates.

 

Could you please have a look at the statements and the spready and tell me 'what' I need to pud in or amend.

 

Sorry, I know this is YOUR time etc. but I don't want to be wrong on either side. PLLEASE HELP me get this right.

 

Thanks

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

as post 61

 

get the statint spready

 

put in your total and the end date from the other spready

 

this will then give you the 8% statint figure you are entitled to

on your charges reclaim that you are entitled too.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

on the statin sheet

 

just the total from the CI sheet and the date. on line 20 nothing else...

 

so 19/3/2009 - 8% stat int on cancelled PPI reclaim - £2655.88

 

thats it

 

no need to list anything

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

show me

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep good wrapped up now then

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

spreadies,fos cq + covering letter

 

all to cap1

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well thats why you did all the spreadsheets

to show them you know what you are going on about

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...