Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • thought your story rang a bell. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/416315-knightsbridgecreditfix-iva-treated-me-very-badly-thinking-of-bk-now-help/ you vanished and never cameback. dx  
    • and it legally informs them of your correct and current address as you must do with all old debts last paid/used in say 7 yrs you dont want backdoor CCJ's. what were the names of these IVA scammers, the one you took it out with, and the one that scammed you to let them take over please? your story is slightly worrying. dx  
    • Incidentally, congratulations on not buying the warranty. That is another Big Motoring World rip-off. See what we have to say about extended warranties and the Big Motoring World attitude to them is particularly unhelpful
    • well that google is from 2019, but the photos are certainly of someone driving on the public highway in/out by an ANP system, though the site of where the camera actually is, is not showing there are anpr cameras up by the low yellow barriers but they wont get from facing shots from there. interesting, needs to be checked if the road IS a public highway but on private land, cause as you say, if the whole area is max 4hrs , how does the hotel work< ?? must have a reg entry system.  now as for taking pictures of cars on a public highway then guessing the are parking ...erm.... i dont thnk thats right nor allowed under GDPR. dx  
    • Under the consumer rights act 2015, if a defect manifests itself within 30 days and you have a right to return the vehicle for a full refund. If any defect manifests itself within the first six months of ownership then you have a right to return the vehicle for a full refund subject to the retailers right to carry out a repair. If the retailer declines to repair or if the repair fails then you have the right to return. The problem here is that you have to assert their right. It's a bit ridiculous – but you have to do let them know preferably in writing that you are asserting your rights under the consumer rights act either the 30 day right or the six month right. I suppose that you haven't done this – which would be quite understandable because most people don't know that these rights exist and that they are subject to these conditions – the condition that the right must be inserted. It is frankly ridiculous. The dealers know it and we have lots of instances of this company delaying appointments et cetera and our strong suspicion is that they are simply trying to run their customers out of time. On the basis that you haven't asserted your rights, we now have to look to ordinary contract law. You are entitled to purchase a vehicle which is of satisfactory condition and which remains that way for a reasonable period of time. Clearly it is in satisfactory. They are blaming you. Has your independent inspection identified the reason for the defect? This will be important because as you have seen BMW are already saying it is down to your driving and you are going to have to produce evidence that it wasn't down to your driving and the you drove it absolutely reasonably and it was simply the condition of the car. Have you been without the car for any period of time. Is it driveable now? If the car was off the road for a substantial amount of time and was still off the road then you would be able to argue that this is a fundamental breach of contract and that you have been deprived of substantially the whole benefit of the contract and therefore you will be entitled to treat the contract as breached by Big Motoring World and insist on cancelling the contract. It may be that you will eventually be obliged to keep the car but have the repairs paid for. Have you had any quotations for the work that needs doing? I asked you questions about the MOT – but you haven't responded.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Suspended after problems at work


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4228 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok look, I really can't help if you are not going to go into enough detail.

 

I am going to suggest that if the position with the supervisor is no better your option is to talk to your manager or lodge another grievance, but if you want to take things to an Et you are going to have to do better than "Talks to you like s**t". You will need dates, times, exact quotes, any witnesses. You will need medical reports. You will need full details of the mediation and follow up process.

 

Similarly you are going to need a lot more evidence on the overtime thing.

 

If you wish to fight this, you need to put a bit more effort into demontrating why you are in the right.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok. The supervisor would tell me to do one thing then manager would approach me to ask why the job wasn't being done the way it should be, i would explain to the manager what supervisor had said to do causing the manager to disagree. it was always manager saying one thing and supervisor saying another. supervisor would come across very sheepish to say something to you, everyone in the depot knows what the supervisor is like but they won't say or do anything about it, i got to the point where i approached my manager about the way the supervisor was making me feel he told me to put it in a email to him and he would deal with it, nothing got done so it carried on until the point i hated going into work i also told my manager this, i went to see my gp explained to her what was going on, how i felt etc and she put me on the sick with stress, i went back to see my gp 2 weeks later i was no better as nothing was being sorted at work so she gave me another sick note and put me on anti depressants, when i first returned to work my supervisor was told by h.r to keep contact minimal until we had mediation, and there was no follow up progess that was it end of it,

 

I have my work records on what i done on the days on overtime i.e you are expected to do ten items an hour so in 5hrs you do 50, the company are saying i claimed 5hrs overtime but only stayed 1.5 hrs but i couldn't do 50 in 1.5 hrs, on a normal 8hr shift i do 80 items, they are going off tunnel pass times not on work records, i couldn't and wouldn't claim 5hrs ad only stay 1.5 hrs, i have worked for this company for 15yrs and never had any of this until i put informal grievance in against supervisor. could it be possible this is all happening or everything that has happened is because i'm the only female on shop floor, only other female that you hardly see is admin.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are likely to be dismissed for overtime claims so focus on that first. If you are dismissed the supervisor issue is a factor that my be taken into account at an ET

 

You need evidence. Time logs, work logs, etc, for both of you. In lots of detail.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

My supervisor undermined everything i done he would tell me to tell somebody else to do a certain job, i would go ask the person to do what i had been told they would give me mouth full i would go to supervisor and he would do nothing about it, i had to take the abuse from people who worked below me, supervisor would come in check all the figures for the day if he wasn't happy i would get him having a go at me not the person it concerned, he would look down on me, this has only really been happening since beginning of this year, supervisor has already been sent on an anger management course because of way he speaks to people, the course helped for a little while but he sharp slipped back into his old ways and manager was well aware of the way he is because different people told him. at one point he asked my partner if he wanted supervisor role saying there was going to be big changes over next couple of weeks that was nearly a year ago and nothing changed, like i said manager not at our depot very often so it's like he doesn't care really, he has another depot in his home town which he's trying to save from redundancy ad closure.

 

My partner yes was suspended for same allegation as me not the alleged complaint.

 

Big mess and it really has got me worried sick. never felt like this in my life not even when i got divorced

Link to post
Share on other sites

only have work logs no time logs, what is ET

 

Does the company not need more evidence than they have?

 

I fill out overtime sheets every month they get handed in and signed off my supervisor, he checks the work logs to see how many been done against the hours being claimed.

 

What about the people including supervisor who claim same amount of hours as us but don't use tunnel pass

Edited by amanda69
Link to post
Share on other sites

Does company not need more evidence?

 

Every month i handed in overtime sheet it would be signed off by supervisor after he checked logs for figures, he checked this against hours claimed.

 

What about other people who claim same hours as us but have no tunnel pass and use their car to come to work instead of company work van?

Link to post
Share on other sites

why are you double posting everything?

 

I don't know what a tunnel pass is. should I? I do know you need to focus on proving your hous, not anyone else's.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't know why i double posted, sorry, a tunnel pass is from one side of the water to the other, so you go north to south under the water and vice versa, i have been concentrating on proving my hours, it just feels like certain people suspended and ones without a pass aren't, so it looks like to me they are trying everything to get me out since grievance. I haven't had pass since june and they only decided to suspend me in oct when they get copies of pass use every month,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Amanda,

 

I realise this is a very stressful time for you and you must be worried sick about the prospect of losing your job.

 

However, if you want people to help you on here you need to be much clearer in your explanations and answers to questions.

 

Eg."a tunnel pass is from one side of the water to the other." Now no doubt this makes perfect sense to you, but to someone who does not even know what type of job you do it means very little.

 

Now I still feel quite strongly that your employer is trying to get rid of you as a direct result of you submitting an informal grievance against your supervisor, in legal terms this is called victimisation and in order to avoid having to pay you redundancy money in January. Therefore if they do sack you without very good reason including providing proof you claimed for overtime hours that you did not work, you may be able to submit a complaint to an employment tribunal for unfair dismissal and victimisation. But that is all in the future.

 

Most important now is to concentrate on getting ready for the disciplinary hearing next week.

 

Firstly have you arranged for either the union rep or a colleague to attend the hearing with you?

 

What evidence do you have to prove you worked the hours that you are claiming for?

 

Has there ever been a discrepancy or questions over overtime hours claimed against you before?

 

Was it always you the supervisor came to when he had a question or there was a discrepancy? If so is there are reason for this? eg you are the most senior?

 

It is really important to be prepared for the hearing next week and please do not bring up things about what other people did or did not do, it is almost never helpful.

 

DJ

 

Can you tell us in plain english what type of work you do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Amanda,

 

I realise this is a very stressful time for you and you must be worried sick about the prospect of losing your job.

 

However, if you want people to help you on here you need to be much clearer in your explanations and answers to questions.

 

Eg."a tunnel pass is from one side of the water to the other." Now no doubt this makes perfect sense to you, but to someone who does not even know what type of job you do it means very little.

 

Now I still feel quite strongly that your employer is trying to get rid of you as a direct result of you submitting an informal grievance against your supervisor, in legal terms this is called victimisation and in order to avoid having to pay you redundancy money in January. Therefore if they do sack you without very good reason including providing proof you claimed for overtime hours that you did not work, you may be able to submit a complaint to an employment tribunal for unfair dismissal and victimisation. But that is all in the future.

 

Most important now is to concentrate on getting ready for the disciplinary hearing next week.

 

Firstly have you arranged for either the union rep or a colleague to attend the hearing with you?

 

What evidence do you have to prove you worked the hours that you are claiming for?

 

Has there ever been a discrepancy or questions over overtime hours claimed against you before?

 

Was it always you the supervisor came to when he had a question or there was a discrepancy? If so is there are reason for this? eg you are the most senior?

 

It is really important to be prepared for the hearing next week and please do not bring up things about what other people did or did not do, it is almost never helpful.

 

DJ

 

Can you tell us in plain english what type of work you do.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

i work with medical supplies. the tunnel pass is on the north east so from newcastle to sunderland you have to cross the water so the tunnel pass takes you under the river tyne from north to south,

I have a union rep

only evidence i have is my work logs

my supervisor tells me how to do my job even though i'm a team leader if that makes sense

i am an infection control laundry team leader

Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to the tunnel pass are you saying you have to go from one "office" to the other "office" and one is based in the north and the other is in the south but you can claim travelling time?

 

yes got tunnel pass from home on the north to the south and company pay, but the company are saying i went through to early and claimed more than i should in wages, been to union and i have a good case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm still really struggling to see what you mean. I think it is because you are abbreviating things, missing things out, and not writing in full sentences.

 

I think you may do better with your rep who can ask you questions more easily. I am glad you have one.

 

Very good luck with it.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm still really struggling to see what you mean. I think it is because you are abbreviating things, missing things out, and not writing in full sentences.

 

I think you may do better with your rep who can ask you questions more easily. I am glad you have one.

 

Very good luck with it.

 

hiya

 

there is alot to this case i would be here along time if i had to write it all down, the union put a grievance in last week against the company and told them we are taking them to appeal then court, i will fight them all the way. i have worked for this company 15yrs and they are damaging my character. i won't let that happen, i will keep you posted,

thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

can an employer treat people differently for same allegation, loads people involved but only 3 suspended.. 1 back at work with final written warning other 2 to be sacked, already pre determined before disciplinary hearing, manager of company told union rep what the out come was going to be

Link to post
Share on other sites

amanda, it is really difficult to advise on the info you give. You will get a better answer from your rep if they know the whole story.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

amanda, it is really difficult to advise on the info you give. You will get a better answer from your rep if they know the whole story.

 

hoping to talk to rep tomorrow, my head battered, confused, upset by way company treating me, no point to loyalty these days

thanks anyway, i will come back to you soon

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello, you wrote an email to the manager and nothing was done. i guess that you still have proof of this email. this as well as other things helps build up a case of constructive dismissal = ie, various things being done and not done by your employers

Edited by ims21
Link removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...