Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Stautory Demand - I need Help Please!


LouLou70
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4188 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

On a point of detail. They have a common law obligation to look after you interest when dealing with a repossession. Despite whatever the T&Cs say. You should get a price from a few different sources for your models of equipment at 6 months old. If you can, 3 sources.

 

The average of these will give you a figure of what should be obtained. Hopefully, there will be a big difference to what was obtained.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you to everyone who has replied (and sorry for the cut&paste faux pas 42man!).

 

I think the consensus seems to be that we are stil lin dispute over the amount claimed in the SD because they have not provided me with the proof I requested in my last letter that they at least tried to achieve fair market value. I intend to ask to have the SD set aside on this basis. Assuming that it is set aside they may well then begin civil proceedings. If so, then I will defend this by again by arguing that they have sold the equipment to one supplier without any evidence that they can produce (assuming they can't) that they have achieved anything like fair market value. If the SD is not set aside then I can only argue that it wasn't served correctly and thus any ensueing bankruptcy petition would be invalid.

 

I genuinely don't have any assets so making me bankrupt wouldn't achieve anything - except wipe out all my debts I guess!! I will if I can use the small amount that I have been offered by a family member to settle with creditors across the board. I would just like to get this over and done with and get on with my life.

 

I am sure that these guys will have done a 'deal' of some sort and re-leased the equipment that they sold at a ridiculously low price back to the manufacturer. I have been offered 'almost new' laundry equipment in the past by them for not far off the 'new' price!

 

Anyway, thanks again everyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you do the set aside, I would suggest that you say that you have an ongoing dispute in regard to the amount of debt following the end of a contract and that the creditor company has not replied to correspondence. The request to set aside, is to allow both parties to continue with appropriate discussion and negotiations over the dispute to avoid unnecessary use of court time and inapproriate use of the insolvency system, as a first option to resolve a contractural dispute.

 

Something like that. You have to flesh it out a bit.

 

I have since read about the serving of SD's and the rules appear to have been changed. There is now a difference of opinion. It would appear sending an SD by normal post is allowed, provided they have an affadavid saying that the SD was sent on x day to address xxxxx where they know the defendent is resident. Setting aside an SD on the basis of wrong delivery of an SD does not appear to be enough and saying that an SD was not received may not be adequate to avoid a bankruptcy petition.

 

So I think you will have to set aside purely on the basis that there is an ongoing dispute and that use of the insolvency system is not appropriate at this stage.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will need forms 6.4 (set aside) and 6.5 (witness statement) you can find them both here and you can use continuation sheets too - http://www.bis.gov.uk/insolvency/About-us/forms/england-and-wales

 

Once you have filled them in then you should take them in or post them (recorded delivery) to the court, the court will be the closest court to you that handle bankruptcies / insolvencies - NOT ALL COUNTY COURTS HANDLE THESE TYPES OF CASES, so if in doubt then ring the court first. Normally in a stat demand the creditor names the closest court to you to set aside. There is no court fee in setting aside a demand.

 

You should use phrases like

 

The defendant totally disputes the debt, the defendant avers that the claimant has not answered the dispute etc etc - you can find plenty of threads on these forums regarding stat demands - have a look here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?190-DCA-Legal-Successes

 

You can back up any of your disputes with high court law (if you know of any). If you do back it up with high court law then remember a lower county court should abide with a judgment from a higher court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you need to attach any letters / correspondence then you should refer to these in the witness statement, when you submit the stat demand you need to take the original to the court along with your set aside form 6.4 - help here filling this out

 

How to fill in Form 6.4

 

For (a) fill in your name and address

 

The section that states attend before the Registrar leave blank. This will get filled in by the court.

 

For (b)

on the hearing of an application by (b) (insert your name)

 

An application for an order that the statutory demand dated (insert date on the SD that you received from the creditor) be set asidelink3.gif

 

For ©

The grounds on which the applicant claims to be entitled to the order are set out in the witness statement (insert the date that you hand the forms into the court).

 

For (d)

The names and addresses of the persons upon whom this application should be served are:

(d) (insert name and address of creditor or solicitors)

 

For (e)

The applicant’s address for service is: (e) (insert your name and address)

Cross out where it states (Solicitor for the) and just leave the word Applicant and sign and date the form.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your costs should be submitted so they are in the court files at least 7 days before the hearing, but you can only do this when you have a court date - this is a link to how to fill out a LITIGANT IN PERSON costs sheet - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?327997-Statutory-Demand-from-Hamptons-Legal-WON-STAT-DEMAND-DISMISSED/page2&highlight=hamptons

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks 42Man.

 

On the Stat demand they have added interest of £557.70 based on 5% above Finance House BAse RAte. This was the amount on the original hire agreement to the Company (before it went into liquidation) that was specified as being owed in the case of default. It seems that they are trying to claim that through me as a guarantor. I had read somewhere that they cannot claim stat interest on an SD. Does this count?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 42MAn. Just going through the Witness statement. Is it appropriate for me on this fom to list the correspondance sent and received by both sides - for clarity - this constitutes 8 letters and a phone call in total.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can still also question service on form, albeit acknowledged. would be up to cred to explain why no personal service as rules require it 'if practicable in the particular circumstances'.? then for J to decide.

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ford is saying that on the set aside, you could also question the service of the SD, given the dates you mention in your post. If it was dated 30/7/12 and not received until 24/10/12, then the service of the SD is iffy.

 

The rules as ford says are for SD's to be personally served 'if practicable in the particular circumstances'.

 

It would be for a judge to decide about the service of the SD. It was dated 30/7/12 and then when it was received, it wasnot even personally served. What attempts did the creditors make to serve the SD between July and October ? This is not for you to answer, but if there was any hearing about the set aside, this question could be asked.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

loulou

re that '4 month' expiry period you mentioned sols mentioned, could this be re scots law?

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

..........

 

The rules as ford says are for SD's to be personally served 'if practicable in the particular circumstances'. ...

 

so, the presumption would be that there should be personal service unless the 'particular circumstances' prove/allow otherwise?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...