Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • An update! I emailed both Andrzej.Tuleja and James_Goldsmith at Whirlpool dot com. I got a phone call from their executive team a couple of days later, and a replacement part dropped on the mat a week after. She was quite apologetic, however, also reiterated the "90 day warranty" period on customer fitted parts, and did not comment when I mentioned that the CRA also applies as I was a consumer buying from them directly. So I now have a spare door switch if the machine decides to eat another in the future! Cheers all!   Note dx100 that the "Hotpoint CEO" you linked to is not related to the hotpoint appliances, but some kind of marketing app.
    • yep, throw that morality card out the window....9/10 you never owe a DCA ANYTHING!! they are NOT BAILIFFS!!
    • (See the link to DVLA’s INF188/6 document I posted above, page 4 as cited) “I have a new medical condition that I have told the DVLA about on my recent application. Can I drive? As soon as the DVLA receives your correct and complete application for a new licence and as long as you meet all the Section 88 criteria, you may drive. It is important that you are satisfied that the medical condition you have declared on your application does not stop you from driving. If you are unsure, check with your doctor or healthcare professional before you make a decision. You can also look up your condition in the ‘Assessing fitness to drive’ guide, which you can find at www.gov.uk/dvla/fitnesstodrive to see whether you meet the medical standards for driving. As this guide is intended for healthcare professionals, it can be complicated. Your doctor or healthcare professional should be able to help you if necessary." It seems that DVLA think that S.88 does apply for applications disclosing a new medical condition after all. Why might this be so, and what of “qualifying application" and "relevant disability"? S. 92(1) imposes on the driver a requirement to disclose a relevant disability. S.92(3) requires the Secretary of State to refuse such an application disclosing a relevant disability ….. EXCEPT S.92(4) requires the Secretary of State to grant such an application if the relevant disability is “adequately controlled”. Hence my belief S.88 can apply for medical conditions (if the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive) as the application remains a qualifying application IF the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive, until DVLA (on behalf of the Secretary of State) say it doesn’t, provided the driver believes they meet the (medical) standard. Additionally, at (or before) June 2013 (as noted in my previous post) the medical standard for fitness to drive for conditions involving excessive daytime sleepiness was changed from “completely controlled” to "adequately controlled".  
    • CFO Bill Guan allegedly led a team at the news outlet that was behind a global money laundering scheme.View the full article
    • Anyway, I've asked my Booking.com flat-rent-out-bloke what needs to be done on the Booking.com portal to cancel a reservation. I got a late message "I'll let you know tomorrow".
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclaycard Debt sold to MKRR


bankonthis
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4240 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

I have recently recieved a letter from Barclays regarding a visa card debt that i've been struggling to pay the balance off in a payment plan with them on and off for a couple of years now. The letter stated the the debt had been passd on to MKRR.

 

This was followed today by another letter from MK RR, this is asking for an acknowledgment of the debt and an offer to allow me to pay in installments. I would attach a jpg but having a bit of trouble uploading the main body of the text is :-

 

dear mr XXXX

 

Further to our communication regarding transfer of ownership of your balance we have not recieved your offer of payment.

 

we want to help you and are in a position to offer and installment arrangement to clear the outstanding balance , but we can only do this after speaking to you.

 

Please call us to discuss ways we can help. Alternatively we will continue to contact you by telephone or letter so we would advise you to contact us to resolve this matter.

 

the 'Balance' and 'Original Creditor' are writted as such in a box at the bottom of the page

 

 

This the first time they have contacted me 'regarding transfer of ownership of' my balance other than the letter from barclays wich merely stated that it had been passed on to this Company.

 

I would like to know if this debt having been sold on to MK RR is legally enforceable and if there are any loopholes i can jump through to evade them or at least make them work a little harder. so far i haven't acknowledged the debt to them and i would welcome any input as to my next move.

 

 

Many thanks in advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I would not do anything that acknowledges the debt.

 

And certainly do not engage on the phone with them at all.

 

Do you have all of your Barclaycard statements? I bet there are loads of unlawful charges on the account which can be reclaimed together with interest.

 

If you don't have all of the statements then SAR Barclaycard.

 

The new owner can enforce the debt through the courts if they have the correct paperwork and follow the correct procedures.

 

I would also send a CCA request to MK.

 

Templates for SAR and CCA request are in the CAG library, the link to which is at the top of every CAG page in green.

Edited by ims21

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

watch MKRR

 

they are a slippery lot

 

and try all manner of spoofing tactics.

 

CCA them first

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BoT,

 

If you don't have all the necessary a/c statements, get them with a SAR.

 

If you have the statements, read some of the BC **Won with Compound Interest** threads here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?97-Barclays-BCard-and-Woolwich-successes

 

See Shelley's thread which contains all that you need.

 

Prepare a spreadsheet using 24.9% as the compound rate, see what you should reclaim and send BC your Prelim Claim letter.

 

:wink:

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BoT,

 

If you don't have all the necessary a/c statements, get them with a SAR.

 

If you have the statements, read some of the BC **Won with Compound Interest** threads here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?97-Barclays-BCard-and-Woolwich-successes

 

See Shelley's thread which contains all that you need.

 

Prepare a spreadsheet using 24.9% as the compound rate, see what you should reclaim and send BC your Prelim Claim letter.

 

:wink:

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and thank you so much for taking the time to respond, I'm on my own for the last ten days so working and taking care of the children whilst my partners abroad, and it's been a bit difficult to keep up. On monday I recieved another letter from mk this time it's more threatening.

 

]Final notice[/b]

 

as you have not taken up our offer of help as a legal requirement we must now inform you that we are instructing our pre-litigation department to review your account for further action.

 

they may commence litigation against you which will increase the amount payable due to costs incurred. should the matter proceed they could take a charge against your property (if you are a homeowner) or have monies deducted from your salary (if you are employed)

 

It is not too late to resolve this matter, please contact us immediately to allow us to help you avoud this.

 

 

I'm sending off the SAR and CCA but should i send the CCA to MKRR or to BarclayCard?

 

If it takes 40 days to get hold of my statements will it be too late presumably i'll have been taken to court by then if they're serious?

 

thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you checked your cra file ?

 

that'll tell you who owns the debt too

 

only the owner of a debt can take you to court

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BOT,

 

CCA goes to MKRR and the SAR goes to BC.

 

No need to say anything else in reply to MK's latest threatening letter.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just been on Experian and it shows the Barclaycard as 'settled' and 'debt assigned to another CIAS member'...presumably this is MKRR but there is no new active account showing on my experian report is this normal?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BOT,

 

Yes, that address will be fine for the SAR.

 

See the first line in DX's signature above where it says - Credit Reference Agencies There are links that take you to the relevant CR Agencies.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just been on Experian and it shows the Barclaycard as 'settled' and 'debt assigned to another CIAS member'...presumably this is MKRR but there is no new active account showing on my experian report is this normal?

 

opps that means it s been sold then

 

you need to be careful here

 

they could be serious on the legal threat

 

there have been several claims issued by this lot of recent.

 

get that SAR going and the CCA

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep sri

 

i've got no intention of scaring you.

 

personally, i have had those letter numerous times from them

with nothing ever happening.

but , once a DCA has brought a debt, all gloves are off

but

its prob to your advantage

 

BC dont normally supply/hold enforceable agreements esp if older than mid 2007.

 

what is the balance and are you aware from past statements PENALTY charges have been levied?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...